• 0

I hate Backup Exec


Question

For the last couple of months I have been dealing with Backup Exec 2010.

I dont know very much about it, but have been given the task of recover all of our old media (tapes) which were created with earlier versions of BK EX.

Some of these tapes date back to 2001 - they are all written on 35GB DLT.

My question is: When I insert a tape, I run the inventory - all is OK. I then run Catalog - all is OK.

Then I run a restore job - redirect the dump to a large 2TB HDD - soon thereafter the job will fail.

The error I get is " the requested media was mounted, but it does not contain the requested backup set. The media may have been overwritten by another media server."

I read a little about the error - and in layman's terms - "... if a backup was created with another version of BK EX, then was moved to another server with a different version of BK EX - and NOW you're running a different version ---- you're screwed !"

Is there a way to simply take the data from our old tapes and simply dump them into a folder which can be easily read, and saved, etc. ?

Everything I have read about Backup Exec is that it can only be spawned from hell because no other way it can suck so bad and cause so much frustration - and just when you think you have it ficgured out - it stops working

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1017164-i-hate-backup-exec/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Is it a legit version of Backup Exec? if so... call their support, they are actually pretty good over the phone.

I personally would try and find out what version of backup exec the backups were made with and reinstall that version just to get the data off.

  • 0

Is it a legit version of Backup Exec? if so... call their support, they are actually pretty good over the phone.

I personally would try and find out what version of backup exec the backups were made with and reinstall that version just to get the data off.

Wario -

Thanks for the reply. Yes this is a legit version - this is for work & we have had a license every year.

Ya know I never even considered calling as most of the time customer support is an absolute joke. According to your post - I guess enterprise-level support is altogether different.

I will give that a try - we purchased some online tech center knowledge base that was $50 - it was a joke and nothing but a selling platform for their $3000 class.

My plan is to get all of our archives on a couple 2TB discs then change our entire backup environment to something that doesnt suck so bad -

My next task is to find some damned good enterprise-level software that works...

  • 0

Ouch looks like someone in IT didn't test their backups! Before blaming the application itself for a known incompatibility issue you have to ask if it's something that should of been tested before upgrading the version...

I guess you're unable to get a hold of this older version to restore the data? I've used this app myself without any issues (although people do mislabel the tapes which drove me nuts!).

  • 0

Wario -

Thanks for the reply. Yes this is a legit version - this is for work & we have had a license every year.

Ya know I never even considered calling as most of the time customer support is an absolute joke. According to your post - I guess enterprise-level support is altogether different.

I will give that a try - we purchased some online tech center knowledge base that was $50 - it was a joke and nothing but a selling platform for their $3000 class.

My plan is to get all of our archives on a couple 2TB discs then change our entire backup environment to something that doesnt suck so bad -

My next task is to find some damned good enterprise-level software that works...

I only use it in a small business entiroment my friend, not enterprise.

Where are you located? we have a contacts list at work with direct numbers for people at Symantec, i can try and get you a direct number if you like?

  • 0

Enterprise level support is ok. Not what it used to be, but worth a call anyway. Very much like microsoft where they own the problem until resolved. The last few times I have called I have been transferred to a tier 2 engineer right away, but I think that is because of my environment. Oh and if you don't have a maintanence agreement you can forget about talking to them. If you want alternatives to backup exec let me know....I know of at least 2 that aren't as costly and seems to have come a long way.

Remember it could always be worse, you could be using arcserve....their tech support is a joke, they will sell their product but they will not support it. You say you ran a backup but you cant restore, well to bad for you buy our next version you can restore with the old version O_o.

Can I ask a really crazy question....why on earth are you trying to get the tapes from 2001 to function? 5 years is normal retention for a business.

  • 0

sc302 -

Guess what our new tape system is ?? You guessed it - Arcserv 12

Well, I honestly dont know why on earth it has to go back so far -- I work @ the US HQ which is in Dallas - our parent company is in Denmark - they call the shots when it comes to overall strategies, etc.

Not 2 weeks ago we renewed our Arcserv maint. contract. But this Backup Exec is my issue - and its a ridiculous piece of garbage.

It says it is created, by design, to not let you restore something that was kinda "bounced from version to version" - well sh*t happens in business - and you need to be able to recover data in all kinds of scenarios.

Why on earth has this product been bounced around from company to company ? Veritas > Seagate > Symantec

Luckily my boss, the IT Director, knows this program is problematic and is happy I am learning as fast as I am - so he isnt on me about not producing some kind of old data...

Anyone know of a process to recover old data, "media be damned" ? just say "here is an old tape.. I want to see whats on it " ? Surely there is a workaround in this crap ?!?

I hope

We could pay some company about $5000 to do it for us - but its towards the end of the fiscal year and there is no more $ -

  • 0

My deepest condolences on Arcserve, I have found it better to write your data in dirt and then try to retrieve the data after a monsoon has washed away what you wrote than trying to get arcserve to do anything useful....you think backup exec is bad....when you get to the point where you tell the engineers to shove their software up their asses you will be in my boat (I believe that was my exact words...have yet to say that to any symantec engineer, I may have said that their software sux but I have never told them to shove it up their ass, there may have been other colorful statements coming out of my mouth but that was the main thing I remember telling the asshat who told me to pack up my machine and send it to them so they can duplicate/troubleshoot the issue, I now refuse to call their support when I have an issue with that software) When seagate owned backup exec it was built off the premise that NT backup could restore the files if needed. Veritas screwed backup exec after they bought it, then symantec screwed it even more.

Enough about that....call up symantec and maybe they can give you some advice to be able to move on. There is a work around....install the old version on a different system, attach your old drive to that system and have at it. Try using NT backup (the backup utility that comes with windows) and see if it can read/restore the files...if it is old enough it should be capable of it.

  • 0

Thanks man - I will try the NT backup method - then call if all else fails

I LOL'd at your comments - even read it to a co-worker who has an office next to mine -

Im trying to get people to feel my pain.

Thanks Again

Arcserve = spawn of the devil

Symantec = spawn of Diablo

not sure which is better.

  • 0

sc302 -

well I guess I can put a small positive spin on this -

I just realized ArcVault and arcserve are 2 completely different things

we have an arcvault12 from Overland Storage which is our 12 cassette autoloader.

arcserve - is a nightmare I dont have to face....yet

Also - I just found our Experts Exchange.com membership login - so I have another method of support.

Now if I can just pay someone to do this for me......hmmm........:shifty:

  • 0

First of all, please calm down. I know how frustrating it can be as I have to deal with lots of backups for a living and fix things when other people break them.

Anyway, if you go ahead and raise a support call, please PM me the number. If I am not mistaken, you are based in the US, so your Backup Exec support would come out of Symantec's Heathrow, FL site. That's where the product is engineered and it makes sense for tech support to be cozy next to people who code the thing. If support are getting you nowhere, I have contacts there -- duty manager, tech support guys -- whom I can get in touch with to get your case to a principal/senior tech support engineer.

Also, worth having a look at this tech note: Click Here. Sounds a lot like the situation you're describing -- can you confirm?

  • 0

First of all, please calm down. I know how frustrating it can be as I have to deal with lots of backups for a living and fix things when other people break them.

Anyway, if you go ahead and raise a support call, please PM me the number. If I am not mistaken, you are based in the US, so your Backup Exec support would come out of Symantec's Heathrow, FL site. That's where the product is engineered and it makes sense for tech support to be cozy next to people who code the thing. If support are getting you nowhere, I have contacts there -- duty manager, tech support guys -- whom I can get in touch with to get your case to a principal/senior tech support engineer.

Also, worth having a look at this tech note: Click Here. Sounds a lot like the situation you're describing -- can you confirm?

deep breath ----- ooooosssaaaahhhhhhhh oooossaaaahhhhhhh

ok - Thanks vanx

I will try calling them tomorrow as its almost 5:00 > Thanks for your offer - I know I'll be using your advice - damned nice of ya' to lend a hand. ;)

To answer your question - yes that is the exact error I get on several different tapes.

But the scenario mentioned does not describe our situation. Which was:

tapes made with old version - now we want to extract the data and dump it to a 2TB external - regardless of readable format. - that simple

nearly every tape says that it is missing or has been overwritten.... weird.

I say nearly because I was successful on 2 restore jobs within the last 4 hours - making my boss think Im a god :D

Is it just me or is this software incredibly confusing because it sucks, or because enterprise stuff has to be confusing and complex to justify the prices ? meh

Thanks for your help man, I appreciate it. - oh and X-Files was the best show on TV. Ever. (minus the last 2-3 years)

  • 0

deep breath ----- ooooosssaaaahhhhhhhh oooossaaaahhhhhhh

ok - Thanks vanx

I will try calling them tomorrow as its almost 5:00 > Thanks for your offer - I know I'll be using your advice - damned nice of ya' to lend a hand. ;)

To answer your question - yes that is the exact error I get on several different tapes.

But the scenario mentioned does not describe our situation. Which was:

tapes made with old version - now we want to extract the data and dump it to a 2TB external - regardless of readable format. - that simple

nearly every tape says that it is missing or has been overwritten.... weird.

I say nearly because I was successful on 2 restore jobs within the last 4 hours - making my boss think Im a god :D

Is it just me or is this software incredibly confusing because it sucks, or because enterprise stuff has to be confusing and complex to justify the prices ? meh

Thanks for your help man, I appreciate it. - oh and X-Files was the best show on TV. Ever. (minus the last 2-3 years)

Hey TEX4S,

No problem mate, glad to help.

Regarding your scenario -- is it possible that a backup that you're trying to restore spans multiple tapes? I recently had to do a bit of work for a client where a backup spanned several tapes. In that case, all relevant tapes were needed to be imported before proceeding with restoring data. The tape holding the first fragment of a backup is crucial as, without it, it's not possible to restore.

Also, what is the version of Backup Exec (BUE) that was used to do the original backups to DLT media? You mentioning 2001 suggests that it's 8.x or earlier as v9 wasn't released until 2003. What is the version of BUE that you're trying to use to restore to a 2TB volume?

Can you also please confirm that you're simply trying to restore data from tapes that were written by an earlier version of BUE? Were they or were they not used for other backups since 2001? If they were, then it is quite possible that data you're trying to recover from 2001 backups has been partially/completely overwritten.

It is also possible that some backups that were taken using an earlier version of BUE had version-specific features enabled. If those features were not carried forward to your newer version of BUE then it is possible that meta-data read in during the import may not be mapped correctly.

Customers whose retention periods dictated that data has to be kept for many years always give me headaches. A lot of them tend not to move data onto new forms of storage -- and thus test restores by staging data on disk before writing it to newer tapes -- they simply wait until the lightning strikes.

Let me know how you get on with support :)

  • 0

Thanks again vanx - you're exactly right -almost all of our backups take up multiple tapes. According to what you said, I will Inventory and catalog everything before attempting a restore job. Thanks for that !

Our reader has a dirty read/write head so until our cleaning tapes come in - I am not doing anything with Backup Exec.

Now I have find some company that wants to buy 120 ThinkPads :rofl:

  • 0

what are the specs? I'd like one if the specs are right for the money. I want a cheap laptop for trips and stuff. PM me. Also PM me the experts-exchange link I know 2 experts there that are awesome with symantec products!

  • 0

Thanks again vanx - you're exactly right -almost all of our backups take up multiple tapes. According to what you said, I will Inventory and catalog everything before attempting a restore job. Thanks for that !

Our reader has a dirty read/write head so until our cleaning tapes come in - I am not doing anything with Backup Exec.

You are welcome. It would be nice to be able to restore data from just one tape in a set if you don't have others, but that's just not the way the backup process works.

Let me know how you get on after you clean things up.

  • 0

Thanks vanx -

My boneheaded intern managed to wipe out a 2TB drive which was to be put on tape backup on our new system - when I get back to the office and pull my foot out of his a** I'll give you some updates - you have been great man - I feel like I need to pay you for your time :blush:

remixed - I'd love to help but I dont want to sell these piece by piece - Im looking for a company to buy all of them at once - sorry

  • 0

ARCServe is the worst backup software I have ever dealt with. Period. Today it burnt about 4 hours of my time. I seriously hate it. Wow ARCServe! :s

sw1tch - let me send you my intern and he can waste even more of your time !! He is going to be a Junior @ Texas A&M in Comp Sci and has to tell me at least 10x a day about how Microsoft is evil and he will change our billion dollar company over to all linux - I just say "shut up and go get my dry cleaning you idiot !" :D well - I do tell him to shut up

  • 0

sw1tch - let me send you my intern and he can waste even more of your time !! He is going to be a Junior @ Texas A&M in Comp Sci and has to tell me at least 10x a day about how Microsoft is evil and he will change our billion dollar company over to all linux - I just say "shut up and go get my dry cleaning you idiot !" :D well - I do tell him to shut up

Haha classic! I spent 4 hours because my stupid Helpdesk deleted the schedules when doing a restore job and if you don't set them up in a particular way it will not eject the tape. Did I say I hated it. Yes I believe I did :rofl:

  • 0

Thanks vanx -

My boneheaded intern managed to wipe out a 2TB drive which was to be put on tape backup on our new system - when I get back to the office and pull my foot out of his a** I'll give you some updates - you have been great man - I feel like I need to pay you for your time :blush:

No problem, happy to help. That said, all contributions are gratefully received :) Would be nice to know what company you're working for though (PM, if you can). Not so I can point my finger and laugh, just curious.

  • 0

OK - now comes my weekly "is this possible, and if so, how ?"

I have moved the Backup Exec 2010 & the old Quantum DLT tape loader over to a newer server which happens to be the server that is connected to our arcVault tape switcher.

I am wondering if its possible to "convert" all of our old DLT tapes over to LTO ?

Instead of having to restore all of the old DLT stuff (with missing tapes) to a HDD somewhere, then back that up to our LTO tape autoloader - can I just move/convert them on the fly ?

Thanks Again -

  • 0

OK - now comes my weekly "is this possible, and if so, how ?"

I have moved the Backup Exec 2010 & the old Quantum DLT tape loader over to a newer server which happens to be the server that is connected to our arcVault tape switcher.

I am wondering if its possible to "convert" all of our old DLT tapes over to LTO ?

Instead of having to restore all of the old DLT stuff (with missing tapes) to a HDD somewhere, then back that up to our LTO tape autoloader - can I just move/convert them on the fly ?

Thanks Again -

First things first -- what kind of DLT (SDLT I/II, S4, etc) and LTO media (2/3/4/5) do you mean? Also, how do you plan on doing this? Simply cloning one tape onto another could give you lots of wasted space on your LTO media as it generally has bigger capacity.

Yes, it is possible to "convert" your DLT tapes to LTO. There are even specialist firms that are in business of doing that.

If you wish to use Backup Exec to do this conversion, you would need to catalog data from all of those DLT tapes. Then, create a duplicate job for catalogued backup sets with LTO drive(s) as target.

Let me know how you get on :)

  • 0

ARCServe is the worst backup software I have ever dealt with. Period. Today it burnt about 4 hours of my time. I seriously hate it. Wow ARCServe! :s

please call up their support and tell them to shove their software up their ass so that I am not the only one. :p

tell them you are going with a backup that works most of the time (backup exec)....until you get some crap error that has a general answer like we are sorry your backup failed today, for some reason we can't backup this file perhaps tomorrow will be better for you.

I wish computer associates a firey death into a black hole while each and every tech is hung by their balls....bunch of tards running that place. I can only imagine breaks by the water cooler with everyone drooling and staring at each other, each with a case of parkinsons. fking retarded morons can't even draw a line much less do any sort of mathematics to make a program that runs right...I would love to drop a nuke (or several) on their door step taking out any and all bystanders that could or do work for that place....they all need death.

  • 0

sw1tch - let me send you my intern and he can waste even more of your time !! He is going to be a Junior @ Texas A&M in Comp Sci and has to tell me at least 10x a day about how Microsoft is evil and he will change our billion dollar company over to all linux - I just say "shut up and go get my dry cleaning you idiot !" :D well - I do tell him to shut up

When he is about, oh, 40 or so he will realize Microsoft is money hungry not evil. Microsoft does make a good product, although sometimes they do release crap as do every corporation in any industry where there is significant change between models/products/years. Look at the big Toyota flop or any car manufacturer. If you don't load you pc up with crap/trials/pirated software it actually runs as expected. Many microsoft servers are up for months at a time and the only time they go down is due to updates. True *nix doesn't need to go down as frequently and just runs, but it isn't really a gui that stays running constantly now is it? Server 2008 has an option to run in core mode (no gui) but requires the admin to really know and understand the power shell, and I believe many things server are going to the powershell to be able to function....exchange is hybrid (needs ps to function, some things have been stripped from the gui, and can use gui to run certain admin functions..but everything can be done in the ps).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • it would've been better to just have a screenshot with claude running instead of using a generic thumbnail that doesn't fit the narrative.
    • Helium Browser 0.13.2.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.2.1 changelog: 6b6fbd0f revision: bump to 2 (#1907) cb3f77bd helium/ui/zen: fix cmd+s shortcut sidebar preference in zen mode (#1849) e3980159 deps: bump onboarding (#1905) c99531d5 helium/core: add an option to copy URLs from tab context menu (#1904) c1aba0ea helium/search: add kagi image search params (#1899) eb6711f4 helium/core/hibernate: add an option to hibernate other tabs (#1901) 425306f5 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.102 (#1897) ae94c3c8 helium/core/update-pref: improve auto updates strings (#1896) 06897c1d patches & domain_substitution: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.102 d09826d0 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.102 9aeb58da helium/search-engine: reject default engine urls without %s (#1893) 4d7bb965 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 fa67665c i18n: fix "add shortcut" string collision (#1891) 6894bd30 devutils/i18n: parse meaning into source.gen.json dc3fe739 helium/kb-shortcuts: disambiguate "Add shortcut" string cbf38eb4 i18n/apply: pass meaning to fingerprint generator 53ea9920 extra/disable-jit-flag: build drumbrake only if supported Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.2 by Razvan Serea ExplorerPatcher is a versatile and free tool that allows you to tweak and enhance the Windows Explorer. It comes with a range of useful features, including the ability to add new context menu items, change file name colors, and enable hidden features. Feature summary Choose between Windows 11 or Windows 10 taskbar (with labels support, small icons and lots of customization). Disable Windows 11 context menu and command bar in File Explorer and more. Open Start to All apps by default, choose number of frequent apps to show, display on active monitor and more. Choose between the Windows 11, Windows 10 and Windows NT Alt-Tab window switcher with customization. Lots of quality of life improvements for the shell, like: Skin tray menus to match Windows style, make them behave like flyouts and center them relative to the icon. Choose action when left and/or right clicking the network icon. Revert to the Windows 7 search box in File Explorer, or disable Windows Search altogether. Disable immersive menus and use mitigations that help you run the real classic theme without glitches. Discover the program's full range of features by reading this wiki article. ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.2 changelog: Tested on OS builds 22621.4317, 22631.7079, 26100.6899, 26100.8037, 26200.8246, 26200.8457, 26300.8493, and 28000.2113. TIP: Windows Defender no longer flags ExplorerPatcher. It is no longer needed to configure Defender exclusions. Enjoy! Important Fixed Windows 10 taskbar and Start menu crashes on builds 26220.8474 (Beta) and 26300.8493 (Experimental). Update ExplorerPatcher as soon as possible. Without this update, Explorer and the Windows 10 Start menu may stop working on future builds. Microsoft removed Windows 10 Start menu components from StartTileData.dll on these builds, so the Windows 10 Start menu option has been removed where it is no longer supported. Temporary workaround: replace C:\Windows\System32\StartTileData.dll with the version from build 26xxx.8457 (x64/ARM64). This may stop working in future builds. Work is ongoing to restore Windows 10 Start menu support. Highlights Fixed Windows 10 battery flyout crashes on build 25951+. Network flyout buttons reverted to pre-24H2 behavior as a side effect. Taskbar location changes now apply instantly. Windows 11 taskbar auto-hide is no longer modified when Explorer starts. "Open Start in All apps by default" is now hidden when using the new Windows 11 Start menu. Fixed Windows 10 Start menu crashes on builds 21996–22000.51. Fixed Regedit crashes when switching to thumbnail view in registry import/export dialogs. Improved compatibility with recent Windows builds, including 26H1 ARM64. Improved ARM64 performance. Added Greek translations. ep_taskbar Now supports all 43 Windows 11 languages. Fixed issues in the system tray and other components. Updated DLL naming scheme for mod developers. Improved TrayUI compatibility and vtable stability on builds with multiple ITrayUI revisions. Fixed a taskbar initialization deadlock. Windows 10 Start Menu Added a new tile layout engine to restore support removed in build 26xxx.8474. Restoration is currently partial: Tiles may overlap when pinned using "Pin to Start". Restarting StartMenuExperienceHost.exe or explorer.exe fixes the layout. Further improvements are planned. Other Changes Added an executable blacklist to prevent shell extensions from loading in selected applications. Updated Windows 10 Start menu animation support for ARM64 builds 28xxx.2149+. Please consult the README for more details. Download: ExplorerPatcher 26100.8457.70.2 | ARM64 | ~11.0 MB (Open Source) View: ExplorerPatcher Home Page | Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 KB5094126, KB5093998 finally stops trusting a critical system threat by Sayan Sen This week Microsoft released the Patch Tuesday updates for June 2026 with KB5094126 on Windows 11 25H2, 24H2, and KB5093998 on Windows 11 23H2. On Windows 10 22H2 it's under KB5094127. Alongside the announced release notes for the new builds, Microsoft has revealed another change that is coming to Windows with these new releases. It has been confirmed that custom folders are getting a significant change with the June 2026 updates as such folders or folder names defined by desktop.ini will no longer appear after this update is successfully installed. While you may inititally think this is a bug with the new release, Microsoft has stated that this is in fact "expected behaviour" in its new support article regarding this which Neowin spotted today while browsing. Essentially it's a security hardening measure such that custom folder presentations are treated as potentially unsafe whenever Windows is not sure about their origin and whether that desktop.ini folder can be trusted or not. Here is list of such untrusted files and folders: Files downloaded from the internet that carry Mark-of-the-Web (MOTW). Files copied from certain remote locations, such as some WebDAV or HTTP-based locations. Files on network paths that are not classified as intranet or trusted by zone policy. For those who may not be familiar, Desktop.ini is a special configuration file used by Windows to customize the appearance and behavior of individual folders. Basically Windows can read specific instructions stored in Desktop.ini instead of displaying every folder with the same default settings. This can be used to apply custom icons, thumbnail images, localized folder names, and such informational tooltips (infotip). The file can also influence certain folder-specific behaviors and properties. It is typically stored as a hidden system file within a folder that has been designated to support Desktop.ini customization. However, because Windows Shell automatically reads and applies these attributes whenever a customized folder is opened, they have historically (since the Windows XP days) presented an attack surface as a result of an unchecked buffer in the Shell component responsible for extracting custom attributes from Desktop.ini files. As such an attacker could create a specially crafted Desktop.ini containing a malicious or corrupted attributes and place it on a network share. So if a user were to browse that folder, Windows would automatically process the file, potentially triggering a buffer overflow. This could allow arbitrary code to run with the same permissions as the logged-in user. Hence a seemingly harmless folder could become a security risk when their contents are not properly validated. For admins and users alike looking to manage this behaviour, Microsoft has shared a few ways. One of them is to assign a trusted mark on the folder in case you are sure of its source. Secondly a policy can be used to revert back to the previous state. Finally, the MOTW can be removed too to indicate to Windows that this is a safe file. The company explains: Option 1: Add the source to Trusted Sites (Recommended) If the affected content is stored on a known internal or managed source, add that source to the Trusted Sites list. Once the source is treated as trusted, Windows processes desktop.ini from that source normally. This keeps the protection in place for other locations and is the lower-risk option. Option 2: Use policy to restore previous behavior Organizations that need broader compatibility can enable the policy Allow the use of remote paths in file shortcut icons.Enabling this policy restores the pre-June 2026 behavior for affected remote or untrusted scenarios. Option 3: Check for and remove the Mark of the Web (MotW) If the desktop.ini file has a Mark of the Web (MotW), Windows may treat it as coming from an untrusted source and block customization. Verify whether MotW is present and, if appropriate, remove it from the desktop.ini file. This can restore expected behavior, but should only be done for trusted content, as it removes the associated security protection. To remove the MotW tag, open PowerShell and run one of the following commands: For a single desktop.ini file: Unblock-File "C:\Your\Folder\Path\desktop.ini" For all desktop.ini files in a folder: Get-ChildItem "C:\Your\Folder\Path" -Recurse -Filter desktop.ini -Force | Unblock-File Microsoft has warned though against using a broad opt-out using the provided policy as it reduces protection against potentially malicious remote folder-customization content. As such the tech giant recommends trusting only controlled internal sources and keeping trust settings as strict as possible. You can check out the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • LAV Filters 0.82.0 by Razvan Serea LAVFSplitter is a multi-format media splitter that uses libavformat (the demuxing library from ffmpeg) to demux all sorts of media files. LAV Splitter is a Souce Filter/Splitter required to demux the files into their separate elementary streams. LAV Audio and Video Decoder are powerful decoders with a focus on quality and performance, without any compromises. Supported Formats: MKV/WebM, AVI, MP4/MOV, MPEG-TS/PS (including basic EVO support), FLV, OGG, and many more that are supported by ffmpeg! LAV Filters are based on ffmpeg and libbluray and is aimed to offer a all-around solution to perfect playback of file-based Media as well as Blu-rays. LAV Filters 0.82.0 changelog: LAV Splitter NEW: Support for demuxing Dolby Vision Enhancement Layer streams NEW: Support for Animated WebP images Changed: When demuxing Blu-ray discs, Dolby Vision metadata is available on the primary video stream LAV Video NEW: Support for Animated WebP images Changed: Hardware decoding support for DVDs has been removed Download: LAV Filters 0.82.0 | 15.5 MB (Open Source) View: LAV Filters Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      207
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!