Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm trying to set my home network, but i'm having some problems.

I can't see or ping the computers on the same workgroup.

The network has a Win7 laptop, a Win7 desktop, a Vista laptop and a XP desktop.

I don't care so much for the Vista and XP, computers, but I'd really like to set the network running ok between the Win7 computers.

- I'm using a wireless network, with DHCP (using address reservation by MAC)

- They are all on the same workgroup.

- All of them can access internet just fine and they can ping the network printer and the gateway.

- Network discovery is turned on, on both win7

- File/printer sharing is on also, so LAN rules are ok on Windows Firewall

- I've unchecked "use sharing wizard"

- Homegroup is not set on neither.

- I've tried with NetBIOS over TCP/IP enabled and disabled

- Pinging computers (including Vista and XP) always return "Destination Host Unreachable"

I've checked all of this by reading other forums/sites, but i still can't figure what is wrong, so any help, suggestion, tests/checking is appreciated!

@+sc302

My router doesn't seem to have this option (even though it is in the manual, but the manual is also for another model).

But it looks like the default state is disabled.

I need to check it better, because it makes a lot of sense...

Thanks!

  On 29/08/2011 at 18:15, sc302 said:

what make/model do you have?

TP-Link TL-WR941N

I found the wireless > wireless advanced tab, but there is no "enabled AP isolation" option like it says on the manual.

I need to see if there is another way to check this settings, and see if this option really exists in this model

Ok just so we are all on the same page, what workgroup machines are in would have nothing to do with simple ping test. It would have nothing to do with anything other than where machines would be listed in the browselist. Not used for security at all, just simple browse listing location is all.

As to ping, and the windows firewall by default it would block ping.. As to turning it off, did you just set it to off or did you try disable it?

Make sure your rules are set to all all inbound on the firewall, and I would verify you have allowed icmp. The sure you can turn it off.

When you try and ping

"- Pinging computers (including Vista and XP) always return "Destination Host Unreachable""

Are you pinging by name or by IP? Make sure you are using IP for verification, if netbios over tcp is not enabled you might not be broadcasting for name. Depending on what your node type is, you might not broadcast for name, etc.

Once you ping by IP, take a look at your arp table

arp -a

Do you see the MAC of the device you tried to ping - is it valid? or all zeros? If all zeros never going to work, and that might point to a AP isolation thing. If you get the correct mac for the ip your trying to ping - you can verify this with ipconfig /all on the computer your trying to ping to see what its mac is.

And your sure no firewall blocking, double check that AP isolation setting. That being on for sure would prevent your wireless from talking to each other.

So ping by IP, and then check arp table -- this will give us good info to work with on where to look to what the problem is.

@BudMan

Hey there! You've helped me a while ago with a network problem in my work place, and i hope we can solve this one also!

I've turn the firewall off, but i've checked the rules and there is an inbound rule allowing icmpv4 request (set by flie/printer sharing)

I always ping by IP.

Checking the arp table, the IP i'm trying to ping doesn't show on the list

Since nobody can't see/ping nobody, I think it is the AP isolation like sc302 said, but i can't find if this is enabled or not.

If i enter the configurations for the router (by IP on the browser), i can't find where it is stated on the manual.

I'm checking if there is another way to check this settings.

so you see no arp entry for that IP right after you try and ping it? or do you see zeros for the mac?

Yeah kind of hard to ping with out a mac to send the traffic too ;)

What specific router are you using?

is that v2 or v3 of the TL-WR941ND, its a ND right not just N -- I don't see just a N

post-14624-0-35123800-1314644227.jpg

  On 29/08/2011 at 18:52, sc302 said:

perhaps either a firmware update or update to dd-wrt will help. your router is listed as supported by dd-wrt.

I'm thinking this might help =)

@BudMan

I can't see the IP entry... if it is all zeros, i remember i can set a mac address to it =)

I'm using TP-Link TL-WR941N

@BudMan

Well, the title says TL-WR941N =)

If you see on the upper right of you screenshot it applies for the N and ND model

I checked the versions:

Firmware Version: 2.1.2 Build 080321 Rel.63639n

Hardware Version: WR941N v2 00000000

The last option on this page is the "Enable Short GI"...

But the screenshot you've sent is different than mine, so I will try a firmware update and see what happens

Good and bad news...

I guess it was the isolation issue.

'I guess' because i'm in a secondary network now, that have this option explicit and disabled, and the network/ping is fine.

But I'm on this other network because my main router stopped working after the firmware update =P

Gonna buy a new one...

It was a fairly simple problem, but i didn't know this ap isolation setting...

Thanks everyone!

  On 29/08/2011 at 20:27, sc302 said:

sux that it bricked. :pinch:

It's back up!!!

I took i while, but i tryed one more time (i wasn't going to buy today anyway).

The win7 detected the router and let configure using the PIN. I wasn't working, but after 1 hour, it entered the config page!

I guess the firmware update is really slow =)

Now, with that option disabled, everything is working fine!!

I just don't know how they make a router with this setting on by default and no option to change it... =P

Thanks again everyone!!!

Yeah that AP isolation thing causes people that don't know about it grief all the time ;)

Clearly not something that should be enabled by default on a home type router, but it is very good security feature for say a coffee shop or something where you have lots of guest and don't want them talking to each other over the network because of security concerns.

Another term for it is client isolation, which is better term if you ask me. Also wireless isolation is another term. Some routers allow for isolation between clients on different SSIDs - more modern AP provide for multiple SSIDs so you can do some better isolation and have like a private wireless network and than a guest one where you only have access internet for example.

It still does not protect you from someone that is on the wireless network in sniffing the traffic, but would keep say an infected box hitting your box with worm traffic for example.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I guess companies have numbers that don't necessarily match your assessment.
    • I agree that all capabilities of the card should be reviewed, but there is a very important difference between reviewing what multiframe generation is and does for you, and simply claiming a card has 200+ FPS just because MFG is on. You are probably well aware that frame generation is getting a lot of hate, which I feel like is partly unfair to it. However, Nvidia has used frame generation to tell outright lies about their products, most notably claiming that a 5070 is as powerful as a 4090. Its easy to hate something when it is being used to make dishonest statements like that. I'm not a big fan of the popular term "fake frames" just because I feel like it is overly negative, but I do think it is important to make some kind of distinction between game engine frames and filler frames.
    • What is the replacement or successor to it right now?
    • iPhone 17 Pro Max could have the biggest battery ever on an iPhone by Devesh Beri Leaks around how the iPhone 17 Pro lineup is going to look may have left fans hesitant about what Apple is planning for its next flagship, but not every rumor paints a gloomy picture. In fact, one area where the iPhone 17 Pro Max could truly stand out is its battery; rumors say it is to have the biggest battery ever seen in an iPhone. Let's be honest, battery life has long been a weak point for iPhones. No matter how efficient Apple's A-series chipsets are said to be, users often find their devices running out of juice quicker than expected. Much of the blame could be put on the relatively small battery sizes Apple has chosen over the years, especially when compared to the competition. Many rival brands now give their large-screen devices, those with displays bigger than 6.5 inches, batteries of at least 5000mAh. In contrast, Apple's largest iPhones have lagged behind in this department, with the iPhone 16 Pro Max coming in at 4676mAh. It seems like it is set to change with the iPhone 17 Pro Max, as a prominent leaker, Instant Digital, revealed that the battery of the iPhone 17 Pro Max will finally reach the 5000mAh mark. How big a change would it be? To put it in perspective, the iPhone 17 Pro Max's battery would be about 6.9% bigger than the iPhone 16 Pro Max, 13.1% more than the iPhone 15 Pro Max, and 15.7% more than the iPhone 14 Pro Max. If these rumors are accurate, the iPhone 17 Pro Max may finally address one of the most common complaints about Apple's flagship devices, but then again, Apple would still be lagging as most of the brands, specially the Chinese ones have already moved to the battery limits of 6000mAh and some have even touched 7000mAh. This rumor comes after the observation that Apple's struggles with AI may prompt it to transition Siri to either OpenAI or Anthropic's AI capabilities. Image source: Digit.in
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      956400 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      loose_observer earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      BeeJay_Balu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      filminutz earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      159
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!