Recommended Posts

I cannot believe House is almost over for good. :( I will be so sad.

Did anybody see the episode yesterday? It was great. Such a range of emotions. I think House and Wilson's bromance is cute. The end was especially hilarious when House left those pictures on Wilson's computer.

Judging from what we know of the future episodes, I'd wager you can expect more of that type of feeling from the final three episodes.

So what do you all think of the episode that aired last monday? and the way it ended?

what i think:

I think that the face house gave was made for us to expect the worse and the tumor/cancer is worse, but i think the face house gave was because he's in shock that its completely gone and nothing there, i dont think they'd kill off wilson

My thoughts exactly.

well dammit, i dont like not knowing whats going to happen ,ha.

so i bet him and house go on the run :p and disappear for good, end of the show :p

and then next year they'll redo Prison Break 2: The Run of House.

ha

i didnt expect to see olivia wilde, i don't think she's an as amazingly beautiful actors as people seem to think, but gotta admit her character has been very important to the show.

Not a bad idea, but judging from the preview, that doesn't really seem likely...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFG79agEkyw

Maybe House gets arrested on purpose in order to make Wilson feel obligated to live for when House gets out.

Never mind, that doesn't make sense. He clogged the drain before his other attempts to sway Wilson.

Goodness, this past episode was filled with emotional ups and downs, lol. I knew that Wilson's cancer was going to be worse because the other way would have been too obvious. Now how is being sent to prison for six months while Wilson only has five to live? I don't know if he will somehow get out of it or what. I think he will tell Wilson he loves him and that he will show real emotion. Wilson will probably die, and House will end his addiction issues, in an after-thought type of deal. Who knows though, really. These writers are amazing.

What a shock! The whole episode was ups and downs and frustrations! Now that house finally kept his deal of sticking with Wilson decision he's going to be sent to jail? Damn it!

Next episode is last, I wonder how it goes, i heard it's a double (80 min?).

Yeah, it is, 2hr special, so they say but really 80mins or so. I think House, being House, will try a prison break that goes sideways into yet another near death experience for him that probably finally puts everything into place and maybe takes some of his anger/rage at life away.

I wanted to smile, but I was too depressed. It was nice seeing Cameron again. Too bad Cuddy didn't show...but it worked fine without her I guess.

I thought it was odd her not showing up and makes me think that Lisa Edelstein left on bad terms. Of course, it could also be a scheduling conflict.

In the show, as close as her character was to House, I think she would have made time to go to his funeral.

So can someone (in spoiler tags) summarize how it all ended?

I stopped watching last season, but I am genuinely curious to hear how it all ended for good.

TIA,

DL

Wilson has cancer, only has 5 months to live. House lashed out in his usual way, but this time it backfired and he caused a lot of damage to the hospital. He is going to jail for 6 months, won't be able to get out until after Wilson dies.

House starts treating a patient who is a drug addict. This patient has ALS and will die soon too, so he tells House he'll take the blame for prank. They end up together in some warehouse where the patient OD's, and somehow the building has caught on fire. House is left alone to die. So he starts hallucinating people he's been around for years, but it is merely his subconscious trying to get him to try and find a way out. But he's given up.

Wilson and Foreman figure out where he is and as they get there, the building explodes. The EMTs pull one corpse out of the building, after the fire is put out and the corner confirms it is House's body. There's a funeral for him and a lot of former cast members return to pay their respects and give a eulogy.

While Wilson is speaking, his phone goes off. It is a text that simply states Shut up. Or something like that. Then you see Wilson arriving at his apartment where House is sitting the steps. They take off for 5 months of doing whatever they want.

Foreman figures out House is still alive because House left his id badge in Foreman's office.

Oh man, I never thought I would be so upset when a TV show will end. At least not after Stargate... This episode was great, the ending was epic.

I really thought for a minute that House actually died, but when that phone started ringing I got a big smile on my face, almost involuntary. :D

Beautiful. Fantastic TV show, amazing actor and great writers. But, like all great things, it must come to an end...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!