{ Poll } Are you happy with Windows 8?


Satisfaction rating  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you happy with Windows 8?

    • Yes, very! Would definitely buy it :)
      22
    • Mildly, will wait for BUILD to make up my mind :|
      22
    • Nope, I'm leaving Windows! It's either Mac or Linux for me :(
      5
    • Don't care.... (because I use something else/ or am fine with an older Windows)
      8


Recommended Posts

Tablet-->hell yes.

Desktop-->not yet.

as long as I get an awesome nvidia powered tablet with it and have good gaming and good media options and be able to run photoshop without problems then yesssssss.

anyone with anything with nvidia awesomes with windows 8 news let me know. nvidia should just say f it and make a whole tablet pc for it.... I would get it fo sho.

I want a 10 inch tablet, 6+ hours battery life running photoshop, at least 4GB RAM, a good sound chip/DSP, user replacable battery, full ports, SD card, and comes with a car kit.

Just for a "proper" tablet based version alone, hell yes. Desktop most likely, a little leery about the new start screen but hey, chances are a GPO will disable it if it annoys me, looks pretty damn good otherwise.

let's hope so the start screen is meh for desktops but makes sense for a tablet.... must be part of the "think outside the pc" thing MS is pulling.....

let's hope so the start screen is meh for desktops but makes sense for a tablet.... must be part of the "think outside the pc" thing MS is pulling.....

Personally don't see why it wouldn't be, almost all of Windows can be customized or flat out removed/disabled in one way or another, besides the guys at MS aren't stupid or blind, they're going to know that some people aren't going to like a big change.. just look at those that are still hanging onto XP for dear life for example. Going to take some time getting used to it, sure, it's a pretty big change. Of course most of us here are talking out of our collective butts as we're mostly basing everything on little bits of info from here and there and actually haven't tried it yet. Time will tell and all that. If it's a flat out stinker, Win 7 is going to be viable for quite some time yet.. not going to be a child about it and make things worse by switching to something that doesn't run anything I need, that's just silly.

Personally don't see why it wouldn't be, almost all of Windows can be customized or flat out removed/disabled in one way or another, besides the guys at MS aren't stupid or blind, they're going to know that some people aren't going to like a big change.. just look at those that are still hanging onto XP for dear life for example. Going to take some time getting used to it, sure, it's a pretty big change. Of course most of us here are talking out of our collective butts as we're mostly basing everything on little bits of info from here and there and actually haven't tried it yet. Time will tell and all that. If it's a flat out stinker, Win 7 is going to be viable for quite some time yet.. not going to be a child about it and make things worse by switching to something that doesn't run anything I need, that's just silly.

this is why I wish MS would show more customizations to assure people that they can still be in control over the look.

like having a different color scheme (like all black tiles like I would have mine at) or a nice wallpaper behind those tiles....

or having the start screen disabled for a professional system.

it's like not knowing weather the new apartment you really want to rent allows cats or not.... they won't respond to inquiries about it so you get frustrated.....

This thread just doesn't make much sense. How would we know if Windows 8 is good? The product isn't released yet and we only know a couple of things about it. Ask the question after Windows 8 has been released.

This thread just doesn't make much sense. How would we know if Windows 8 is good? The product isn't released yet and we only know a couple of things about it. Ask the question after Windows 8 has been released.

I originally called this poll: "Are you Happy with Windows 8, so far?"

But later reomved "so far" since I thought that people would get what am I saying.

let's hope so the start screen is meh for desktops but makes sense for a tablet.... must be part of the "think outside the pc" thing MS is pulling.....

To me, it seems as if the Start Screen will be a fantastic and very useful component of the operating system on desktops. Currently, I often use MetroTwit, not only because it is the best Twitter client, but because it notifies me with popups at the bottom of my screen when anyone I'm following posts a new tweet; similarly, I pin Facebook to my Taskbar because I find the notification overlay icon very useful. It appears the new Start Screen could include this useful information for me but on the tiles, so I will no longer have to open seperate applications to be notified of the information I'd like to be notified about as soon as it happens.

A tile for a Twitter app could show the latest tweet from any of my followers, and a tile for a Facebook application could actually be more useful than currently pinning the Facebook application to the Taskbar; it could display the full text of the notification, not just an icon informing me of a new notification. The Facebook tile could also inform me whenever any of my friends post an update likewise to the Twitter tile, and of course the Twitter tile could also show mentions and new direct messages.

Of course, I am not saying I expect the above to be possible, but it appears to be possible from the limited demonstrations and blog posts we have seen so far. All of this also revolves around the idea we will be able to have the Start Screen open at all times on another screen if we wish; I don't expect this feature from Microsoft, and I wouldn't be surprised if they haven't implemented it, but I really hope they have due to how useful the Start Screen could be for me and many others. It seems we will no longer need to open any applications if we'd like to see the latest updates or information; we will be informed of new mail, new IMs, new notifications, new news articles, and much more by just glancing at the Start Screen.

From what we've seen so far, the Start Screen seems to be the feature I will value most, so it certainly has a place on the desktop version of Windows 8. Of course, Microsoft may have implemented some central notification system that includes popups in one of the corners, which might mean I decide not to have the Start Screen open at all times, but we'll see :)

what I wanna know is we can have the classic desktop in one screen and the start screen (metro) in the other.

*added bonus... remembering this on startup and booting to this....*

I would have the smaller monitor as metro... my monitoring monitor....

and the big screen is classic.... working on photoshop, media stuff, using full firefox, server adminning, etc....

To me, it seems as if the Start Screen will be a fantastic and very useful component of the operating system on desktops. Currently, I often use MetroTwit, not only because it is the best Twitter client, but because it notifies me with popups at the bottom of my screen when anyone I'm following posts a new tweet; similarly, I pin Facebook to my Taskbar because I find the notification overlay icon very useful. It appears the new Start Screen could include this useful information for me but on the tiles, so I will no longer have to open seperate applications to be notified of the information I'd like to be notified about as soon as it happens. A tile for a Twitter app could show the latest tweet from any of my followers, and a tile for a Facebook application could actually be more useful than currently pinning the Facebook application to the Taskbar; it could display the full text of the notification, not just an icon informing me of a new notification. Of course, I am not saying I expect this to be possible, but it appears to be possible from the limited demonstrations and blog posts we have seen so far. All of this also revolves around the idea we will be able to have the Start Screen open at all times on another screen if we wish; I don't expect this feature from Microsoft, and I wouldn't be surprised if they haven't implemented it, but I really hope they have due to how useful the Start Screen could be for me and many others. It seems we will no longer need to open any applications if we'd like to see the latest updates or information; we will be informed of new mail, new IMs, new notifications, new news articles, and much more by just glancing at the Start Screen. From what we've seen so far, the Start Screen seems to be the feature I will value most, so it certainly has a place on the desktop version of Windows 8. Of course, Microsoft may have implemented some central notification system that includes popups in one of the corners, which might mean I decide not to have the Start Screen open at all times, but we'll see :)

Hi Calum, nice post. I really agree with your first point about Start screen having a very important role. :yes: (edited)

And here's something, that I think you might find useful (link) /:laugh:

So far from what I've seen, yes pretty excited about it, nice to see some genuine innovation and change versus just a new coat of paint over the same old desktop, which aside from visuals (and functionality of course) really hasn't overall changed much since 95. Not sure on the new start screen yet, have to wait to try it of course. Metro looks very nice, not the tiles but the actual interface itself, looks very sleek and modern, and of course it's Windows so it can be changed anyway. Bored with the old blue pastels, or even worse, the greys in some other desktops, talk about 1990's looks. Hope they put up some hard information about the functionality of the start screen soon, namely customizing it, accessing the rest of the links, searching, etc.

what I wanna know is we can have the classic desktop in one screen and the start screen (metro) in the other.

*added bonus... remembering this on startup and booting to this....*

I would have the smaller monitor as metro... my monitoring monitor....

and the big screen is classic.... working on photoshop, media stuff, using full firefox, server adminning, etc....

I would like that, and that is what I'm hoping I can do; use my smaller monitor for keeping track of the live tiles, and use my larger monitor for everything else. Of course, if I'm watching a film on my large monitor, I'd use the smaller monitor for everything else. It's not just a case of using the Immersive experience on one monitor and the old Desktop experience on another though because sometimes, we may want to keep the Start Screen showing on one monitor and use an Immersive app on the other.

Hi Calum, nice post. I really agree with your first point about Start screen being very important. :yes:

And here's something, that I think you might find useful (link) /:laugh:

Thanks :) And, haha, if you see my other posts, you'll notice I usually use paragraphs :D I guess I just didn't realise quite how long that post was.Thanks for informing me :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!