• 0

Which Multi-Hosting provider is decent and good to recommend?


Question

My FileSonic and FileServe accounts are coming to an end. I am considering to probably get a multi-hosting premium account but I am unsure which is reliable and good. In terms of speed of download and surely will be able to download from providers like filesonic, wupload, megaupload and such. I've come across Zevera but of course still skeptical about it.

Do you have one to recommend?

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Use torrents if you need that much warez.

http://www.linksnappy.com/

http://fetch.io/

http://filepunch.me/

Those are sites you'd check out.

I can't believe you honestly just told someone who uses filehosters to use torrents! LOL!! That's like telling someone whos' used to driving a Ferrarri that he should buy a Dodge! Anyone who has used filehosters with a download manager will tell you that once have you used this you can never go back to slow-ass torrents. You got no idea what you're talking about and hence shouldn't comment. I don't care how fast you think your Torrents are, Filehosting with a download manager is ALWAYS faster. Don't believe me, try it!

Anyone with half a clue stopped using torrents many, many years ago. Torrents are dated, slow technology used by cheapskates!

..

As for Zevera, I started using Zevera not long ago and it isn't too bad. Except that they no longer support Fileserve. The other major problem I have encountered with them is that if you are using a download limit account, when you request Zevera links that it automatically counts against your download limit, before you've downloaded it. This means you wanna make sure you only request links for things you actually wanna download.

  • 0
  • 0

I can't believe you honestly just told someone who uses filehosters to use torrents! LOL!! That's like telling someone whos' used to driving a Ferrarri that he should buy a Dodge! Anyone who has used filehosters with a download manager will tell you that once have you used this you can never go back to slow-ass torrents. You got no idea what you're talking about and hence shouldn't comment. I don't care how fast you think your Torrents are, Filehosting with a download manager is ALWAYS faster. Don't believe me, try it!

Anyone with half a clue stopped using torrents many, many years ago. Torrents are dated, slow technology used by cheapskates!

..

As for Zevera, I started using Zevera not long ago and it isn't too bad. Except that they no longer support Fileserve. The other major problem I have encountered with them is that if you are using a download limit account, when you request Zevera links that it automatically counts against your download limit, before you've downloaded it. This means you wanna make sure you only request links for things you actually wanna download.

:D

Dude, first of all you have an azzhurt comment for a thing from September, second of all I had RS/MU/Hotfile premium accounts many times over, third... I probably download at faster speeds than you can imagine. (120Mbps connection) So, how about you grow up and come comment later, kid.

  • 0
https://real-debrid.com/ and http://www.alldebrid.com/ is good. If you want ssl (secure) downloading go with https://real-debrid.com. http://www.alldebrid.com has problems for some reason with secure downloading. JDownloader goes great with multi-hosters or with any host really. And if a host is not covered there is Captcha Brotherhood and Captcha Brotherhood Support Thread
  • 0

I can't believe you honestly just told someone who uses filehosters to use torrents! LOL!! That's like telling someone whos' used to driving a Ferrarri that he should buy a Dodge! Anyone who has used filehosters with a download manager will tell you that once have you used this you can never go back to slow-ass torrents. You got no idea what you're talking about and hence shouldn't comment. I don't care how fast you think your Torrents are, Filehosting with a download manager is ALWAYS faster. Don't believe me, try it!

Anyone with half a clue stopped using torrents many, many years ago. Torrents are dated, slow technology used by cheapskates!

..

As for Zevera, I started using Zevera not long ago and it isn't too bad. Except that they no longer support Fileserve. The other major problem I have encountered with them is that if you are using a download limit account, when you request Zevera links that it automatically counts against your download limit, before you've downloaded it. This means you wanna make sure you only request links for things you actually wanna download.

 

For full speeds you need to pay on those filehosting sites (most of them), I can get anything I want on torrents and keep downloading on full speed WITHOUT paying :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!