• 0

AVG or Microsoft Security Essentials


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I don't see why you'd switch to MSE, it has relatively mediocre detection rates, relatively slow scanning speeds, and generally likes suck up about ~70MB of RAM which is not particularly "light". There are much better free clients out there... Avast is certainly one of them.

And, in fact, AVG 2012 appears to have one the highest overall detection rates of any free antivirus.

  • 0

Updates do not have to come through WU. They can come through the application too. See the big green "Update" button? Click it ;)

To take it even further I use a batch file that is run by the Windows Task Scheduler once a day that will update the virus signatures :)


@echo off
cd C:\Program Files\Microsoft Security Client\Antimalware
start /min MpCmdRun.exe -SignatureUpdate
[/CODE]

  • 0

I very much liked AVGs firewall when I used it. So I'd say it depends on whether or not you use XP (which AVG has been known to destroy hahah, whoops) or like that firewall.

These guys claim AVG has many false positives though, and MSE gets very few - http://www.av-comparatives.org/

  • 0

MSE is much better as long as your windows is genuine. No antivirus at all is better than AVG. at least you'll save some resources used for nothing. MSE is lightweight on the pc and doesn't use that much resources.

  • 0

I very much liked AVGs firewall when I used it. So I'd say it depends on whether or not you use XP (which AVG has been known to destroy hahah, whoops) or like that firewall.

These guys claim AVG has many false positives though, and MSE gets very few - http://www.av-comparatives.org/

I'd rather have more false positives that I can un-quarantine, than have it miss real viruses.

  • 0

I very much liked AVGs firewall when I used it. So I'd say it depends on whether or not you use XP (which AVG has been known to destroy hahah, whoops) or like that firewall.

These guys claim AVG has many false positives though, and MSE gets very few - http://www.av-comparatives.org/

A quick few summary notes from this site too:

- MSE has the slowest on demand scanner, taking over twice as long as Avast.

- MSE has a detectection rate of about 92.1%, (infact, in the WORST 3 of the 15 products tested), though with very few false positives.

- Avira 10 has a detection rate of about 99.5%, (the highest) with few false positives

- Avast has the fastest ondemand scanner, rate of 97.2%, few false positives.

- McAffee was the only one not to pick up any false positives.

- Avast & Avira get full 3* ratings, MSE gets 2*.

Considering MSE also uses about 70MB of RAM, I'd say go for Avira or Avast's products. They're faster, and they give you better protection.

  • 0

MSE because it detected and a removed a difficult virus that AVG was incapable of seeing and Avira was incapable of removing. (anecdotal I know, but that's one reason I've stuck with it) Also it runs much lighter than AVG.

Avast is decent too though, would consider using them if I worried about viruses at all these days. :p

  • 0

I personally don't use any kind of anti-virus. You wanna stay virus-free, use common sense. Stay away from porn sites, poker sites, don't click on everything that looks true such as "You just won an iPad, click here to claim your prize". Things like that.

I scan my PC with Eset Online scanner and Malwarebytes at least twice a week and I have zero infections.

  • 0

I personally don't use any kind of anti-virus.

I scan my PC with Eset Online scanner and Malwarebytes at least twice a week and I have zero infections.

Bit of a contradiction there. You don't use anti virus but you scan at least twice a week with an anti virus.

Personally I use Avast, because when I have tried MSE, it bogged my PC down. Haven't used AVG in quite a few years.

  • 0

Had one woman who was using Avast, then upon it wanting her to renew it she thought she had to pay for it. So she uninstalled it and put AVG 2012 on it. She said, her computer was so bad she couldn't even use it. It bogged it down that much. I can believe it. AVG 2011 / 2012 is TERRIBLE!

My local competitor here in town loves AVG. In the window of his store he is selling OLD P4 systems / AMD XP / Celeron systems with 512 megs of ram and AVG 2012. WTF! How can that run good!? Those machines would have ZERO ram left upon startup.

  • Like 2
  • 0

Had one woman who was using Avast, then upon it wanting her to renew it she thought she had to pay for it. So she uninstalled it and put AVG 2012 on it. She said, her computer was so bad she couldn't even use it. It bogged it down that much. I can believe it. AVG 2011 / 2012 is TERRIBLE!

My local competitor here in town loves AVG. In the window of his store he is selling OLD P4 systems / AMD XP / Celeron systems with 512 megs of ram and AVG 2012. WTF! How can that run good!? Those machines would have ZERO ram left upon startup.

these machines (the ones you describe) in my hometown are my money makers...I always remove crapafee/AVG from a customers' machine, especially on low ram systems...after removal, they (the machines) are way faster than when I first press the power on button for the first time. I think that people see the avg, and think "oh well, I've got an antivirus....that's all that matters. now, how 'bout some pron?) Nearly every machine that has came through my door has either had AVG or crapafee....or Norton! That's always the FIRST thing to go...and I always replace them with MSE due to the fact that it's released by microsoft, and since windows is made by microsoft, it often makes more sense to use it....because people always think, "since windows is made by microsoft, and they released an anti-virus, and it's their fault (microsoft's, of course) that I have a virus to begin with, why not let them fix it and then let my computer be protected by an antivirus that microsoft made..." sort of like microsoft knew there'd be viruses, then they made an antivirus to fix their flaws....put it this way, I've never had a machine come back due to infection....whereas, I've worked on several thousand machines whose owner thought they were protected with AVG or Avast....or crapafee or norton....and they tend to have severe problems with malware. I worked on a pc at a restaurant (the cash-register) that was so infected that it would take around 20 minutes to boot up...ended up taking out AVG, replacing it with MSE...and to this day, they've never called me back. I'm not talking about 512MB ram, either....this particular machine had 8GB of ram, and yet I could take my oldest pentium (pentium II slot), and it would smoke that machine with all of that ram. So yeah, without question...it's MSE all the way for me!

  • 0

Bit of a contradiction there. You don't use anti virus but you scan at least twice a week with an anti virus.

Personally I use Avast, because when I have tried MSE, it bogged my PC down. Haven't used AVG in quite a few years.

Not a contradiction at all. Just because I don't use anti-virus doesn't mean I don't take care of my system and check it once in a while. Sometimes you go to the doctor to do a full checkup just to be sure you are OK, right? Same thing here.

It's called: Preventive Maintenance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Because Chrome is doing it. And no one said anyone had to update immediately. That's silly. They could update every day for all I care as long as it's fast, and the next time the browser restarts, you're good. And the basic point is not to tee it up for bigger updates. As it is right now, all the windows I had open reopen anyway except inprivate.
    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!