• 0

AVG or Microsoft Security Essentials


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I don't see why you'd switch to MSE, it has relatively mediocre detection rates, relatively slow scanning speeds, and generally likes suck up about ~70MB of RAM which is not particularly "light". There are much better free clients out there... Avast is certainly one of them.

And, in fact, AVG 2012 appears to have one the highest overall detection rates of any free antivirus.

  • 0

Updates do not have to come through WU. They can come through the application too. See the big green "Update" button? Click it ;)

To take it even further I use a batch file that is run by the Windows Task Scheduler once a day that will update the virus signatures :)


@echo off
cd C:\Program Files\Microsoft Security Client\Antimalware
start /min MpCmdRun.exe -SignatureUpdate
[/CODE]

  • 0

I very much liked AVGs firewall when I used it. So I'd say it depends on whether or not you use XP (which AVG has been known to destroy hahah, whoops) or like that firewall.

These guys claim AVG has many false positives though, and MSE gets very few - http://www.av-comparatives.org/

  • 0

MSE is much better as long as your windows is genuine. No antivirus at all is better than AVG. at least you'll save some resources used for nothing. MSE is lightweight on the pc and doesn't use that much resources.

  • 0

I very much liked AVGs firewall when I used it. So I'd say it depends on whether or not you use XP (which AVG has been known to destroy hahah, whoops) or like that firewall.

These guys claim AVG has many false positives though, and MSE gets very few - http://www.av-comparatives.org/

I'd rather have more false positives that I can un-quarantine, than have it miss real viruses.

  • 0

I very much liked AVGs firewall when I used it. So I'd say it depends on whether or not you use XP (which AVG has been known to destroy hahah, whoops) or like that firewall.

These guys claim AVG has many false positives though, and MSE gets very few - http://www.av-comparatives.org/

A quick few summary notes from this site too:

- MSE has the slowest on demand scanner, taking over twice as long as Avast.

- MSE has a detectection rate of about 92.1%, (infact, in the WORST 3 of the 15 products tested), though with very few false positives.

- Avira 10 has a detection rate of about 99.5%, (the highest) with few false positives

- Avast has the fastest ondemand scanner, rate of 97.2%, few false positives.

- McAffee was the only one not to pick up any false positives.

- Avast & Avira get full 3* ratings, MSE gets 2*.

Considering MSE also uses about 70MB of RAM, I'd say go for Avira or Avast's products. They're faster, and they give you better protection.

  • 0

MSE because it detected and a removed a difficult virus that AVG was incapable of seeing and Avira was incapable of removing. (anecdotal I know, but that's one reason I've stuck with it) Also it runs much lighter than AVG.

Avast is decent too though, would consider using them if I worried about viruses at all these days. :p

  • 0

I personally don't use any kind of anti-virus. You wanna stay virus-free, use common sense. Stay away from porn sites, poker sites, don't click on everything that looks true such as "You just won an iPad, click here to claim your prize". Things like that.

I scan my PC with Eset Online scanner and Malwarebytes at least twice a week and I have zero infections.

  • 0

I personally don't use any kind of anti-virus.

I scan my PC with Eset Online scanner and Malwarebytes at least twice a week and I have zero infections.

Bit of a contradiction there. You don't use anti virus but you scan at least twice a week with an anti virus.

Personally I use Avast, because when I have tried MSE, it bogged my PC down. Haven't used AVG in quite a few years.

  • 0

Had one woman who was using Avast, then upon it wanting her to renew it she thought she had to pay for it. So she uninstalled it and put AVG 2012 on it. She said, her computer was so bad she couldn't even use it. It bogged it down that much. I can believe it. AVG 2011 / 2012 is TERRIBLE!

My local competitor here in town loves AVG. In the window of his store he is selling OLD P4 systems / AMD XP / Celeron systems with 512 megs of ram and AVG 2012. WTF! How can that run good!? Those machines would have ZERO ram left upon startup.

  • Like 2
  • 0

Had one woman who was using Avast, then upon it wanting her to renew it she thought she had to pay for it. So she uninstalled it and put AVG 2012 on it. She said, her computer was so bad she couldn't even use it. It bogged it down that much. I can believe it. AVG 2011 / 2012 is TERRIBLE!

My local competitor here in town loves AVG. In the window of his store he is selling OLD P4 systems / AMD XP / Celeron systems with 512 megs of ram and AVG 2012. WTF! How can that run good!? Those machines would have ZERO ram left upon startup.

these machines (the ones you describe) in my hometown are my money makers...I always remove crapafee/AVG from a customers' machine, especially on low ram systems...after removal, they (the machines) are way faster than when I first press the power on button for the first time. I think that people see the avg, and think "oh well, I've got an antivirus....that's all that matters. now, how 'bout some pron?) Nearly every machine that has came through my door has either had AVG or crapafee....or Norton! That's always the FIRST thing to go...and I always replace them with MSE due to the fact that it's released by microsoft, and since windows is made by microsoft, it often makes more sense to use it....because people always think, "since windows is made by microsoft, and they released an anti-virus, and it's their fault (microsoft's, of course) that I have a virus to begin with, why not let them fix it and then let my computer be protected by an antivirus that microsoft made..." sort of like microsoft knew there'd be viruses, then they made an antivirus to fix their flaws....put it this way, I've never had a machine come back due to infection....whereas, I've worked on several thousand machines whose owner thought they were protected with AVG or Avast....or crapafee or norton....and they tend to have severe problems with malware. I worked on a pc at a restaurant (the cash-register) that was so infected that it would take around 20 minutes to boot up...ended up taking out AVG, replacing it with MSE...and to this day, they've never called me back. I'm not talking about 512MB ram, either....this particular machine had 8GB of ram, and yet I could take my oldest pentium (pentium II slot), and it would smoke that machine with all of that ram. So yeah, without question...it's MSE all the way for me!

  • 0

Bit of a contradiction there. You don't use anti virus but you scan at least twice a week with an anti virus.

Personally I use Avast, because when I have tried MSE, it bogged my PC down. Haven't used AVG in quite a few years.

Not a contradiction at all. Just because I don't use anti-virus doesn't mean I don't take care of my system and check it once in a while. Sometimes you go to the doctor to do a full checkup just to be sure you are OK, right? Same thing here.

It's called: Preventive Maintenance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You are clueless. The updates are done in the background so the next time you open Edge the updates are applied automatically. There is no need to close all your tabs. Just keep browsing like you normally do. Clearly you don't use Edge and are just one of those haters that complain for the sake of complaining.
    • I don't get this David. Can you explain it please.  
    • Microsoft is busy. Lots of changes to be released imminently for Windows server or soon. Also, lots happening for next version as well. Third party virus scanning software is being moved out of Kernel mode to avoid repeat of Crowdstrike incident. Windows Protected Mode and Windows Ready Print no longer require third party print drivers to be installed. New storage stack being developed. New NVME drivers now available for Windows Server 2025 to improve local NVME drive performance by 60+ percent. NVME-Of of fabric being worked on for next release to improve network access to NVME drives. ReFs (next file system) now has ability to boot and will become default file system in next release of Windows Server. ReFs improves on NTFS in several areas including resiliency and reliability and scalability. New update stack is being worked on to unify Windows updates, and updates for drivers and first party/3rd party application software. A stricter and more robust third-party driver certification program (ODI) is being worked on to improve performance, thermals, battery life, and reliability on modern Windows hardware by tightening how OEMs and IHVs (Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, NVIDIA, etc.) build and ship drivers. There is a tone more but too numerous to mention.
    • Now disable that stupid OneDrive backup request when Windows starts please. So unbelievably frustrating to only have “remind me later” instead of “no and never ask me again”
    • Hello, The Media Creation Tool is still at v10.0.26100.7019 from October 2025. Just looks like the backend has been updated. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      truespursfan earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      restore went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!