Recommended Posts

Wheldon dies from injuries

Two-time Indianapolis 500 winner and 2005 IndyCar Series champion Dan Wheldon has died from his injuries sustained in a crash at the IndyCar Series finale at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, it has been confirmed. He was 33.

Wheldon was moving his way through the 34-car field after starting from the back of the field, which was part of his $5 million challenge to win the race. His was one of the last cars to get involved in the crash, and was sent flying from the bottom of the racetrack into the wall on the outside.

Wheldon's Sam Schmidt Motorsports car suffered severe damage to the topside, including its rollhoop structure, and once he was extracted and other drivers were treated at the scene, his car was quickly covered with tarpaulin.

Wheldon was airlifted from the circuit's infield care centre to University Medical Centre in Las Vegas, but all medical efforts were to no avail.

Series chief Randy Bernard confirmed the news at 3pm, local time, and said: "IndyCar is very sad to announce Dan Wheldon passed away from unsurvivable injuries.

"Our thoughts and prayers are with Dan and his family. IndyCar, its drivers and teams have decided to end the race."

The race was red-flagged on lap 12 and was abandoned some two hours later. The drivers instead returned to their cars and performed a five-lap salute in Wheldon's honour.

Source: Autosport

R.I.P.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1032811-dan-wheldon-dies-from-injuries/
Share on other sites

Here's his blog about today's race: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/motor/indycar/story/2011-10-15/Dan-Wheldon-frustrated-with-car-in-Las-Vegas/50786654/1 . I don't watch racing much but it's still sad to hear. Apparently some drivers were concerned about the speed of track.

I remember him winning the Indy 500 this year... Its a shame he died. I actually had a ton of respect for the guy. He was an excellent driver and had a bright career ahead of him. One thing is for sure they will not be driving 225 at that track anymore. I wouldn't be suprised if they capped it at 180...That was too fast for such a small track to be honest and the drivers had every reason to worry. I'm not sure if all the prevention in terms of padding for the wall and fence would have helped in this situation. At least 3 cars went airborne out of the 15 that crashed from what i saw.

RIP :(

Racing's a tough sport with little margin for error - been there.

Thing is Michigan International can be even faster than Homestead-Miami Speedway - the record at MIS is a 234.949 mph (378.1138 kph) lap.

Side note: this was Danica Patrick's last Indy race - she's moving on to NASCAR.

RIP :(

Racing's a tough sport with little margin for error - been there.

Thing is Michigan International can be even faster than Homestead-Miami Speedway - the record at MIS is a 234.949 mph (378.1138 kph) lap.

Back in the day, they'd hit 235 and 240 at Indy...they've slowed down in recent years but that was in the 90s. Still it's sad and these things do happen, i think the lesson to be learned here is that if the drivers have concerns about going 225+ on a 1 mile track than maybe the IRL should have considered maybe restricting the speeds on the engines to no more than 200 .

Back in the day, they'd hit 235 and 240 at Indy...they've slowed down in recent years but that was in the 90s. Still it's sad and these things do happen, i think the lesson to be learned here is that if the drivers have concerns about going 225+ on a 1 mile track than maybe the IRL should have considered maybe restricting the speeds on the engines to no more than 200 .

there is no really big difference between 200 and 235

About 18%, just shy of the difference between 45 and 55 mph. Enough to miss someone if things go wonky. The difference between a collision and a scrape or near miss.

I've long thought there should be a lower turbocharger pressure allowed according to the length of the track. It's just crazy to be going that fast on a 1.0 - 1.5 mi straight oval track, but perfectly reasonable at a 2.0 mi (3.2 km) tri-oval like MIS.

percents are not matter. 200mph is still 90 meters per second speed with no room for reaction. it won't help unless you limit speeds to 100mph or just forbid ovals.

you can't do anything no matter if it's 90 meters per second or 110 meters per second. 160kmph would give you a one second to react, so you can slow down to 100kmph, which would be relatively safe for impact.

but would it be racing then?

The biggest problem isn't the speed, though that is, of course, a factor, it's also a race.

Indy, by design, is just dangerous.. It's fragile cars racing in generally large numbers at high speeds.. ****'s gonna happen every now and again..

F1 is similar, but generally there are fewer cars in such a small area, just by the nature of F1 races..

Nascar on the other hand has their safety come from the car, it can take a beating, also just touching Indy cars together does serous damage, not as much in Nascar, unless you send them into a wall.

Not saying there aren't things that could be done, safer barriers like Nascar is adding to most if not all the tracks they race on, and the like.. But racing cars is and will always be Dangerous.. Personally I'd get the drivers together and ask them what they think needs to be changed at the track/in general.. Did they feel the speed was okay, but this was just a freak accident, or did they feel unsafe from the beginning, etc.

there is no really big difference between 200 and 235

Actually theres a huge different - Nascar on its fastest tracks can hit 196 easily...tack on another 40mph and you're now at indy car speeds.

The biggest problem isn't the speed, though that is, of course, a factor, it's also a race.

Indy, by design, is just dangerous.. It's fragile cars racing in generally large numbers at high speeds.. ****'s gonna happen every now and again..

F1 is similar, but generally there are fewer cars in such a small area, just by the nature of F1 races..

Nascar on the other hand has their safety come from the car, it can take a beating, also just touching Indy cars together does serous damage, not as much in Nascar, unless you send them into a wall.

Not saying there aren't things that could be done, safer barriers like Nascar is adding to most if not all the tracks they race on, and the like.. But racing cars is and will always be Dangerous.. Personally I'd get the drivers together and ask them what they think needs to be changed at the track/in general.. Did they feel the speed was okay, but this was just a freak accident, or did they feel unsafe from the beginning, etc.

So what do yo want... a 50 foot high wall so they don't die? Or maybe you'd prefer them to drive 60 around the track. Nascar isn't that much safer...ask Dale Earnhardt Sr. or Davy Allison who both died from wreaks that looked far less fatal than the one today. Dan Wheldon died because his car got launched into the fence cockpit first and impacted the fence...no safer barrier in the world could have saved him from that. It's a freak accident but it happens when you have a car get launched 20+feet in the air going at 200mph. What you fail to realize is these people know the risk they take...they do it anyway because they love doing it. It's rare moments like this that you never see coming.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Would be good to see Google also being forced to do the same. No promotion of Chrome on Google search. Stop installing into the app data of a locked down machine, etc
    • FileZilla 3.70.6 by Razvan Serea FileZilla is powerful Open Source FTP/SFTP client with many features. It includes a site manager to store all your connection details and logins as well as an Explorer style interface that shows the local and remote folders and can be customized independently. The program offers support for firewalls and proxy connections as well as SSL and Kerberos GSS security. Additional features include keep alive, auto ascii/binary transfer, download queue, manual transfers, raw FTP commands and more. FileZilla key features: Cross-platform support – Available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. FTP, FTPS, and SFTP support – Handles standard and secure file transfer protocols. Tabbed user interface – Easily manage multiple connections at once. Site Manager – Save and organize server connection details. Drag & drop support – Quickly transfer files by dragging them. Filename filtering – Include or exclude specific files using filters. Directory comparison – Compare local and remote directories. Synchronized browsing – Navigate in sync between local and remote folders. Transfer queue – View, manage, and prioritize file transfers. Speed limits – Control upload/download speed to manage bandwidth usage. Keep-alive system – Prevents timeouts during long transfers. Remote file editing – Open and edit remote files using local editors. IPv6 support – Compatible with modern networking standards. FileZilla 3.70.6 changelog: New features SFTP: Added compatibility flag to Site Manager to ignore invalid bits in file attributes flags received from non-compliant servers Bugfixes and minor changes SFTP: Updated to fzssh 1.3.0 Updated to libfilezilla 0.56.1 Removed autodetection of FTP server type governing the remote path syntax. Exotic server types now need to be set explicitly on the advanced page in the Site Manager Download page: FileZilla 3.70.6 | ~10.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: FileZilla Home page | Documentation | FileZilla Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough" by Usama Jawad We have seen Microsoft resort to questionable tactics in the past to get more customers to use Edge, such as "bribing" people to use Edge, testing new behavior so that Edge loads automatically on startup every time, and pressuring OEMs to exclusively bundle Edge in Windows PCs. However, the company often receives pushback not only from customers but also from the Browser Choice Alliance (BCA). Now, the collective has penned an open letter to the Redmond tech firm to highlight its dissatisfaction with its practices. For those unaware, BCA is a coalition that touts several browser vendors as its members, including Google Chrome, Midori, Opera, Vivaldi, BrowserWorks, and Wavebox. Its latest open letter to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella emphasizes that "enough is enough" and that user choice on Windows should be respected. It claimed that the company is abusing its dominant position in the PC space to push customers to its first-party browser, even if they don't want to use it. To do this, it resorts to shady tactics, some of which we highlighted at the start of this piece. It says that Microsoft is making it very difficult for users to set their preferred browser across all touchpoints. This is problematic as PCs are becoming even more prevalent in the AI era, so user choice is being restricted across even more devices, further frustrating users (and competing browser vendors). As such, BCA has urged Microsoft to take the following actions to level the playing field: Allow browser suppliers to compete for preinstallation and default deals with Windows PC manufacturers End dark patterns targeted at users seeking to download and effectively use other browsers (including as system-level default) Bring back the ability for users to make switching default browsers simple and transparent with a “single click” change for all relevant file types and apps (including PDFs) Open all web links in the users’ selected system-level browser of choice Eliminate manipulative Microsoft-exclusive banners pushing Edge in Windows, including when users are searching for other browsers Stop using operating system updates to push users back to Edge Remove the restrictive configurations of existing S mode devices that block the usage of third-party browsers. It believes that all browsers should compete on merit, as this will drive innovation and healthy competition. Despite its strong wording and publication of the letter openly, it's unclear if Microsoft will pay any heed to the BCA and if this will result in any tangible downstream benefits. We'll likely find out in due time.
    • Boo! I was excited for this... Stargate SG-1 Star Michael Shanks Rallies Fans After Amazon Axes Revival, Says 'Now Is the Time to Say Something'
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!