Apple Bumps MacBook Pro with Processor, Graphics, Storage Upgrades


Recommended Posts

Apple Bumps MacBook Pro with Processor, Graphics, Storage Upgrades

late_2011_mbp_13.jpg

Apple today quietly released a minor update to its MacBook Pro line, offering upgraded processor, and in some cases graphics and/or storage options at the same price points as the previous models. Portions of the improved specs had been leaked to 9to5Mac by reliable source Mr. X late yesterday.

late_2011_mbp_15_17.jpg

Among the key changes:

13-inch MacBook Pro:

- Processor options move from 2.3 GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 and 2.7 GHz dual-core Intel Core i7 to 2.4 GHz and 2.8 GHz options.

- Hard drive options offer increased capacity, moving from 320 GB in the low-end configuration and 500 GB in the high-end configuration to 500 GB and 750 GB respectively.

15-inch MacBook Pro:

- Standard processor options move from 2.0 GHz and 2.2 GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 to 2.2 GHz and 2.4 GHz options. The high-end custom processor option at 2.3 GHz has now become a 2.5 GHz option.

- For discrete graphics, Apple had previously offered the AMD Radeon HD 6490M with 256MB of memory on the low-end configuration and the Radeon HD 6750M with 1GB of memory on the high-end configuration. Apple has now moved the 6750M to the low-end configuration with 512 MB of memory and given the high-end configuration a Radeon HD 6770M with 1 GB of memory.

- The previous build-to-order option of a 500 GB hard drive running at 7200 rpm has been bumped to a 750 GB drive at the same speed.

17-inch MacBook Pro:

- Processor speeds have been bumped from a base 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7 with a 2.3 GHz upgrade option to a 2.4 GHz base processor with a 2.5 GHz option.

- Graphics have been improved from the AMD Radeon 6750M with 1 GB of memory to the Radeon HD 6770M, also with 1 GB of memory.

- The previous build-to-order option of a 500 GB hard drive running at 7200 rpm has been bumped to a 750 GB drive at the same speed.

Source: Mac Rumors

nice but still no 15" Macbook Air

Until Apple has more competition in the ultrabook market from Windows laptops, I doubt the Macbook Air line of laptops from Apple will change from the 11" and 13" to anything but those offerings. Once manufacturers get 15 and 17 inch ultrabooks out to Best Buys and Future Shops and what have you across the world, Apple fits a niche perfectly for ultra portable laptops where there is really no major competition for Apple.

I really feel that any computer labelled as a "Pro" computer should come standard with a 7200 RPM drive.

They're probably looking to optimize battery life on the non-custom models. I threw a 7200 RPM drive in my 2008 Unibody MacBook Pro (same size, 320GB) and my battery life dropped from ~3.5/4 hours to about 2.5. Big drop... I regret selling the 5400RPM drive for a marginal performance upgrade.

I really feel that any computer labelled as a "Pro" computer should come standard with a 7200 RPM drive.

I would say that any computer labelled as "Pro" should come with an SSD these days. As noted above, a 7200 RPM really tanks battery life, which is pretty important on a computer like this.

They're probably looking to optimize battery life on the non-custom models. I threw a 7200 RPM drive in my 2008 Unibody MacBook Pro (same size, 320GB) and my battery life dropped from ~3.5/4 hours to about 2.5. Big drop... I regret selling the 5400RPM drive for a marginal performance upgrade.

Thats odd. My 13" MacBook Pro (from 2009) has a 500 GB 7200 RPM drive and 8 GB RAM and I still get 4 - 5 hours of battery time (around 3 - 4 hours when running Windows 7 in Parallels). When I changed the components over (when the machine was fairly new) there was no pretty much no change at all (maybe 10 minutes) as I used to do a full day at work on a single charge.

I would say that any computer labelled as "Pro" should come with an SSD these days. As noted above, a 7200 RPM really tanks battery life, which is pretty important on a computer like this.

SSDs are still too expensive, especially at large sizes. A 7200 RPM drive isn't. As for power consumption, 7200 RPM drives use the same or only tiny amounts more power than 5400 RPM drives.

They're probably looking to optimize battery life on the non-custom models. I threw a 7200 RPM drive in my 2008 Unibody MacBook Pro (same size, 320GB) and my battery life dropped from ~3.5/4 hours to about 2.5. Big drop... I regret selling the 5400RPM drive for a marginal performance upgrade.

That seems like an unnatural drop in battery life. What drive did you choose? If you went with (for example) a WD Caviar Black instead of a Caviar Blue, then you were just asking for trouble because though both drives are 7200rpm, one uses more power than the other for the sake of performance.

I'm not sure if Pro machines should have an SSD by default. An SSD large enough for a Pro photographer or videographer to use out in the field is really expensive.

Compared to a "Pro" camera? Probably not. Not to mention, at some level of "pro"-ness, you can charge someone else for the equipment.

But really, I said a Pro model should have an SSD because it's silly to try and argue spec based on "Pro-ness", not to mention there is no Macbook non-Pro any more... so what can really expect except the two lines to blend some. iMac versus Mac Pro, sure, there's an obvious professional-use difference between the two. Macbook Air versus Macbook Pro? I dunno, I guess professionals need DVD drives still.

How pro is a 1280x800 resolution screen?

Compared to a "Pro" camera? Probably not. Not to mention, at some level of "pro"-ness, you can charge someone else for the equipment.

But really, I said a Pro model should have an SSD because it's silly to try and argue spec based on "Pro-ness", not to mention there is no Macbook non-Pro any more... so what can really expect except the two lines to blend some. iMac versus Mac Pro, sure, there's an obvious professional-use difference between the two. Macbook Air versus Macbook Pro? I dunno, I guess professionals need DVD drives still.

How pro is a 1280x800 resolution screen?

Depends on how you define what makes a pro machine a pro machine :p When I bought my 15inch MacBook Pro I went for the HD upgrade for a few hundred which put the resolution at 1680x1050 which is pretty good for me IMHO (which is 132.08 PPI). I'm pretty happy with mine and the ATI GPU is super stable and reliable - I'm happy to have left the world of nVidia in favour of ATI, a good decision on Apple's part IMHO.

not to mention there is no Macbook non-Pro any more...

Yes there is, it's called the MacBook Air.

Macbook Air versus Macbook Pro? I dunno

Dedicated video card, larger screen size, the ability to have > 4 GB RAM, easy to replace hard disk, faster CPU at the higher end, firewire, matte display option, the ability to add another hard-disk if you take out the optical drive?

Yes there is, it's called the MacBook Air.

Dedicated video card, larger screen size, the ability to have > 4 GB RAM, easy to replace hard disk, faster CPU at the higher end, firewire, matte display option, the ability to add another hard-disk if you take out the optical drive?

Two completely different markets. The Pro moniker made sense when the base Macbook existed, it doesn't any more.

I have a 13'' Macbook Pro. It is, essentially, a Macbook in a fancy case with a fancy keyboard. They should call the 15''+ models Pro, as they actually offer features a professional might want.

Yeah, only thing is that resolution. If it were bumped as well I would have highly considered the MBP, but now I'm more interested in the Air.

Just ordered one, with student discount + 3yr Applecare. 25th - 28th estimated delivery :D

Probably be selling again once Ivybridge is released.

Feeling happy to be rid of my awful Acer laptops

Posting from it now :D

I love the attention to detail, which is what you're paying extra for.

Just wondering will they refresh this line up again beginning of next year? or will this last long until ivy bridge is out?

Since Ivy Bridge will probably be a pretty major upgrade (and is supposed to be available next summer I think) I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't a refresh until then.

Since Ivy Bridge will probably be a pretty major upgrade (and is supposed to be available next summer I think) I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't a refresh until then.

Is it next summer I thought it was supposed to be on the Q1 of 2012? Apple will refresh the lineup if new processors are released(like sandy bridge). But I highly doubt if apple would add bluetooth 4.0 before ivy bridge refresh is out though. They might keep adding speed bumps till then.

I really feel that any computer labelled as a "Pro" computer should come standard with a 7200 RPM drive.

So you buy the "Pro Version" with the 7200 RPM drive and then your friend buys the Non-Pro version that comes with an SSD drive and his system runs circles around your pro machine. Sounds like a great idea!

So you buy the "Pro Version" with the 7200 RPM drive and then your friend buys the Non-Pro version that comes with an SSD drive and his system runs circles around your pro machine. Sounds like a great idea!

So I buy a Pro version when an SSD, go, oh this thing won't fit half the stuff I need for my work and go and buy a standard hard drive.

Most "Pro" users (not rich kids that want a MacBook to look cool, but people who actually use the thing for a purpose), working with virtual machines and image/video/sound, development environments and so on don't especially need lightning fast speed, they more often need the space to do their work. A 7200 RPM drive provides a meaningful performance improvement over a 5400 RPM while providing the space Pro users often need.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!