Xbox live accounts being hacked?


Recommended Posts

Did you guys even read the article? Do you seriously think that being able to reset the CAPTCHA so you will have unlimited attempts to find the password isn't a security problem?

If Sony had something like this you all would be letting them have it. Also my password did contain uppercase, lowercase, and numbers in it so it's not just simple password being exploited.

Brute forcing a password is not a 'hack'. If this is it, then it's just these guys using weak passwords.

I agree. Just because they have found a way to brute force it without a CAPCHA doesn't mean its been hacked!

I would hardly call it a serious security flaw.......

I agree. Just because they have found a way to brute force it without a CAPCHA doesn't mean its been hacked!

I would hardly call it a serious security flaw.......

And if your account had been taken over? Of course it's serious, it's not working as it should.

Did you guys even read the article? Do you seriously think that being able to reset the CAPTCHA so you will have unlimited attempts to find the password isn't a security problem?

If Sony had something like this you all would be letting them have it. Also my password did contain uppercase, lowercase, and numbers in it so it's not just simple password being exploited.

Yes... being able to reset the CAPTCHA is a flaw Microsoft should fix asap. However, if your password contained uppercase/lowercase/numbers, wasn't a dictionary word, and wasn't short (<= 6 characters) it would have taken years to brute force your password so it's highly unlikely this flaw has anything to do with it.

Also, since you brought up Sony, does PSN even have any sort of brute force security? I just tried an invalid password 25 times for my PSN account and it didn't lock or display any captcha.

3 failed attempts and the account should simply lock and email recovery is needed. Simple really, throw in a drop down on logon for x, x and x of another password adds another layer of security.

Doh..

Is being able to avoid the CAPTCHA a security flaw? Yes

Is it the reason why your account is being hacked? No. A CAPTCHA is not a replacement for a secure password, if your password is being bruteforced over a network, it is FAR too simple.

This is absolutely NOT the reason why the accounts are being hacked. As others have said, a brute force hack would take years to crack most passwords. Yes, the CAPTCHA method is a flaw on Microsoft's part, but hardly has anything to do with accounts being hacked.

Yup, a security flaw with Live. Not EA. Some people have some back pedaling to do after the recent threads.

Well, at this point this is a "private investigator's" opinion. As far as I'm concerned, it still has not been proven, and if it were that simple, I still think we would be seeing FAR more people getting their accounts "hacked". I still think this is more of a social engineering scam than anything.

3 failed attempts and the account should simply lock and email recovery is needed. Simple really, throw in a drop down on logon for x, x and x of another password adds another layer of security.

Doh..

Agreed. I think that would certainly be wise.

Also, since you brought up Sony, does PSN even have any sort of brute force security? I just tried an invalid password 25 times for my PSN account and it didn't lock or display any captcha.

Wow. THAT is really scary... I guess they haven't learned anything about security whatsoever...

Yup, a security flaw with Live. Not EA. Some people have some back pedaling to do after the recent threads.
The "security flaw" is limited to being able to bypass captcha and then continue brute force. As someone has said already, Sony doesn't even have a captcha. So all those PSN accounts where you "only lost your ID" but no money was lost? They are in equal danger. ;-) (I wouldn't know better, I am not going to play with my WLID and don't have a PSN account to verify one way or the other).

This also shows that all who got hacked had weak passwords and all "I have never used it anywhere but my xbox" were simply stupid. If your password could be brute-forced, then it's not a good password.

If this is really an issue with WLID, which I still doubt it - then MS has bigger things to worry about than Xbox.

This should be merged with this thread: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1036915-xbox-live-accounts-being-hacked/ No need for another one.

This is audio and shakey's day. let them enjoy it. :-D Microsoft is now "hacked" same as Sony. Kind of morale booster, ain't it?

"the email address or password is incorrect" - or not - "That Windows Live ID doesn't exist."

Terrible. That's security 123 students learn in school. Never ever give too much information to hackers.

The message should always be something like "Account informations invalid".

OK, this is absurd for a number of reasons.

First of all, it assumes that the passwords people use are so utterly stupid that they can be brute force hacked in a relatively fast fashion. That's patently stupid, for one. Secondly, most of the phishing or hacking victims have said they had strong passwords (including the couple of people on Neowin who were hacked). So unless they've been attempting to brute force crack someone's password since the original Xbox came out and they got incredibly lucky, then that's no dice. Third, I'm more than willing to bet that many of the hacking victims didn't have their e-mails searchable on Facebook or social networking sites.

It's not even a good theory. The CAPTCHA thing needs to be fixed, absolutely, but that's not even much of a security flaw in the grand scheme of things. You'd have to have good knowledge of what someone would use as a password (or have someone who has an insanely simple password) to have any value in that issue. I'm sure there's some way people are getting this information (and it's more likely they're not even finding out passwords, but using some sort of social engineering to get into someone's account -- like calling customer service and exploiting a flaw in the human system), but this doesn't seem even remotely likely.

Also: can we stop creating a billion topics about this? We only need one, just like all the posts when Sony was hacked were kept in the same place.

I wonder if the same CAPTCHA loophole affects Hotmail.com as well. In any case, I hope Microsoft fixes it soon.

CAPTCHAs are not that much secure.

I would hardly call it a serious security flaw.......

wow glad you are not working for my bank web site.

OK, this is absurd for a number of reasons.

First of all, it assumes that the passwords people use are so utterly stupid that they can be brute force hacked in a relatively fast fashion. That's patently stupid, for one. Secondly, most of the phishing or hacking victims have said they had strong passwords (including the couple of people on Neowin who were hacked). So unless they've been attempting to brute force crack someone's password since the original Xbox came out and they got incredibly lucky, then that's no dice. Third, I'm more than willing to bet that many of the hacking victims didn't have their e-mails searchable on Facebook or social networking sites.

It's not even a good theory. The CAPTCHA thing needs to be fixed, absolutely, but that's not even much of a security flaw in the grand scheme of things. You'd have to have good knowledge of what someone would use as a password (or have someone who has an insanely simple password) to have any value in that issue. I'm sure there's some way people are getting this information (and it's more likely they're not even finding out passwords, but using some sort of social engineering to get into someone's account -- like calling customer service and exploiting a flaw in the human system), but this doesn't seem even remotely likely.

Also: can we stop creating a billion topics about this? We only need one, just like all the posts when Sony was hacked were kept in the same place.

Yeah, I don't believe this either. It just doesn't seem like it would be possible as people have said, their password wasn't an easy guess. It's a flaw that should be fixed though.

Is it possible Microsoft doesn't know how they are accessing accounts ?

Social engineering, inside job or something. Surely an actual hack will lead to something more than Xbox Live which seems small fish if you have someones details.

Even if this isn't the flaw that got hackers into the accounts, it's definitely a good way to learn what accounts exist, and at least attempt common passwords. Knowing the first is a good part of the battle, and of the second even if the success is low (1% maybe, depending how many passwords you try, but not bruteforce) it's still a chance.

Yeah, I don't believe this either. It just doesn't seem like it would be possible as people have said, their password wasn't an easy guess. It's a flaw that should be fixed though.

Is it possible Microsoft doesn't know how they are accessing accounts ?

Social engineering, inside job or something. Surely an actual hack will lead to something more than Xbox Live which seems small fish if you have someones details.

Absolutely. I agree 100%. If they "hacked" all of these people's details, they'd be out to do much more damage than buying a few things on XBox Live... I mean, come on... The fact that that is their focus, leads me to the conclusion that it is not Live, as that would give them access to their e-mail and as a result a TON of other stuff... So, I still chalk this up to social engineering.

hmm claiming this is like the PSN hack is kinda like how lighting candles is like forest fires...

yeah...

I'd bet MS and EA will find some way to stop this, since it's obviously hurting both of them. I'd still guess crappy passwords that are never changed have something to do with it, too. So many people are clueless when it comes to online security and just assume it won't be an issue...until it is.

And i guess some people like you are clueless about server side security. because from what i'm reading it's very weak for xbox live. You never ever say why a login failed. That's gold information for hackers. Live loging does.

You Freeze an account when too much login attempts failed and send a mail to the user to recover the account. Live doesn't not freeze the account but use a weak captcha protection.

Come one that's security 123 students learn in college. Seriously ...

Funny that, im a web designer and have all sorts of I.T knowledge. Yet I still got hacked/phished. Sadly because you know something exists, doesnt mean you wont fall prey.

Don't lose your time. I went thru all this when my wow account got hacked (and i mean it). All people told me it was phishing and such. I am a web dev and knew i did not fall for a scam. I lost a complete night checking my email account log used for my wow account, checking my router log, scanning my HD and memory for a keylogger (even though i play games on my work computer while i surf the web on my secondary computer).

After this night i was 99.99% sure the account was not compromised from my side. Yet people was still telling me it was phishing.

You also always have this guy blaimg your PW strength too saying you need a 50 digits password with asian and russian caracters in (while in fact any good web service will freeze an account before it's even remotely possible to brute force a 8 digits random letters/numbers/symbols/caps PW).

It's a waste of time. They think they are better than anyone ... until the day they'll like me get hacked for the first time.

I don't play wow anymore but i can assure you my SWTOR account is protected using the authenticator app ;).

Interesting. A poster knows more about Microsoft security than Microsoft's multimillion dollar security team? Ok then. Um..no.

I don't. Everyone know about that. Seriously you can't be serious. I simply can't believe it. That's something you learn in the most basic class about security. Carefully word the error messages you show to the end users so you do not tell too much informations to hackers. What hackers get from error messages is gold to them.

Sorry but when you have 2 different error messages, one for when the account doesn't exist and one for when the account login information is wrong this is just bad.

As for the account not being frozen that's hilarious to see some people defending that.

I don't. Everyone know about that. Seriously you can't be serious. I simply can't believe it. That's something you learn in the most basic class about security. Carefully word the error messages you show to the end users so you do not tell too much informations to hackers. What hackers get from error messages is gold to them.

Sorry but when you have 2 different error messages, one for when the account doesn't exist and one for when the account login information is wrong this is just bad.

As for the account not being frozen that's hilarious to see some people defending that.

You still fail to realize that having a valid email or Gamertag really isn't that useful. Unless the password is guessable, then a password shouldn't ever be cracked. Every hacker out there knows that brute force is the worst way of cracking into an account. It's simply not plausible in a short amount of time.

Is it bad that Microsoft confirms if the username is valid? Yes. Is it allowing people to hack into accounts? Absolutely not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!