Cannot Navigate to File Server (via IP or Name) via VPN on XP SP3


Recommended Posts

This one really has me scratching my head because of all the conflicting information. Let me explain.

We have a non-domain based Windows Server 2003 server with a PPTP VPN set up on it. Connecting to it and accessing server shares have not been a problem on Windows 7, Mac OS X, and Linux. We can access the file server via IP (for example, smb://192.168.1.10) on OS X and Linux without any issues, and Windows 7 is able to access the file server by its name (for example, \\SERVER). There's one troublemaker in all of this: XP.

A netbook running Windows XP SP3 has this peculiar issue of being able to connect to the VPN without any issues. As soon as you try to connect to any shares (by IP or Name), it refuses to connect. Pinging the IP and Name results in Timeout errors.

As I didn't have a XP box at home to test this with, I brought the netbook home with me to figure out what's wrong. Oddly enough, I could not replicate the issue. I was able to connect to the VPN successfully AND navigate to the server via IP address without any trouble. At this point, I'm thinking there's something wrong with the owner's home network.

BUT the netbook owner also has a laptop at home running Windows 7 that's able to connect to the VPN and browse the file server (by name) without any trouble.

Needless to say, I'm stumped. I can't tell if this is an issue with her home network or something in XP in particular. With so many things that DO work, it's making figuring out what is in fact the issue tougher. Any suggestions?

Question for you -- what is the exact network your using on the vpn connection and the servers IP?

using 192.168.1.0/24 would really be a bad idea -- since that is going to match up to many home networks range.

So it worked on your home network -- and what network do you use at home, does it overlap with the vpn servers IP or vpn network?

What is the setting on the vpn connection for default gateway on the xp client?

post-14624-0-65347900-1320689262.jpg

Not be able to ping the IP of server is bad sign.. Can they ping it from the win7 box?

I would suggest we get the output of ipconfig /all and route print from the xp client when they are connected. And then the same from the win7 box they say works.

Also what are networks in use, like I said using 192.168.1.0/24 on the server is going conflict with lots of home networks! If you have home user connecting in, I would use an odd ball private network like 172.22.36.0/24 for something -- highly unlikely to conflict with any other networks with something so odd ball.

I have a couple of suggestions -

1) If both the Netbook and PC have static IPs, swap them, reboot and then try it. See if the problem goes with the Netbook or the IP address.

2) If you are DHCP, take the IP info from the PC and enter it on the Netbook as a static address and see if that changes anything. (Again, I'm just looking to see if the IP is at play here).

3) Make sure you have the exact same info (DNS, Gateway, etc) on both. Ive seen something stupid like that happen when 1 machine was pointed to a.13 gateway and the other to a .12 gateway

4) I would then also suggest checking the Internet option -> LAN settings, to make sure nothing is there that isnt supposed to be there

5) Check your HOST file on the Netbook c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts. Make sure that there isnt a line in there that was entered because of a firewall or program that could be causing this issue.

6) Also make sure you are logging in on a netbook with the same user name / pwd in windows as one that is created on the server.

-> Im not trying to be a smart ass here. However, when you said it worked for you, did you use your ID info? Because of the higher security in server 2003 / W7 from XP ive seen this kind of issue happen when the user name and password werent matching on the server box and the xp box, but a W7 box would be able to compensate for it.

Just things off the top of my head. Let us know what resolved your issue.

Good Luck

Alex

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yeah, I can see that. I would hope that an xbox branded handheld could bridge the legal gap. Maybe to help get around the legal definitions of the differences between Windows and xbox, they could just make it dual-boot. That would be kind of shame because I'm sure an xbox app could do all the same things, but if you have to totally shutdown windows and start it up in "xbox mode" then perhaps the game studios would be more okay with that...then down the road maybe a hot new update removes the requirement to reboot to change modes :-)
    • You will soon be able to book hotels directly through the PayPal app by David Uzondu PayPal is getting into the hotel booking business, thanks to a new partnership with the booking technology company Selfbook, announced today. The plan will stick a hotel booking section right inside the PayPal app, letting millions of users find and pay for rooms from Selfbook's partner hotels. If you have never heard of the company, Selfbook is a booking and payment platform that is usually integrated into a hotel's website to make the often-annoying reservation process a lot easier. Its tech helps hotels get more people booking right on their own site by offering payment options people actually use, like digital wallets. Now, instead of just living on individual hotel sites, Selfbook's network will be featured in PayPal's Offers tab. For hotels, this gives them a direct line to a huge audience of logged-in users. PayPal also says that this partnership will help bring travel booking "into the age of agentic AI," with the help of Perplexity, the conversational AI-powered search engine. The idea is that you will be able to just chat with an AI about a trip, and when it is time to book, you can pay for your hotel right there in the conversation. Selfbook provides the plumbing to make the booking happen, while PayPal and Venmo will show up as the payment methods. According to the PayPal announcement: To handle the money side of things, Selfbook is moving all of its direct card processing over to PayPal's Enterprise Payments platform. For travelers, this just means more choice at checkout. People booking at a hotel that uses Selfbook will see options to pay with PayPal or Venmo, along with "Buy Now, Pay Later" plans for splitting up the cost of a stay.
    • So a rando with an unknown setup has an issue that I am not having, what is your point? I could easily reply with a reddit commenter complaining about Windows 10, but it would be just as pointless as your link. My experience is my experience. It seems like you are trying to prove something different than what my own eyes see. Others may have issues with 11 and choose not to use it for their own reasons, but you'll never be successful trying to tell me I should be concerned with issues that don't exist on my systems.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Enthusiast
      the420kid went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      VicByrd earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Reacting Well
      eric79XXL earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      470
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      277
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      245
    4. 4
      snowy owl
      204
    5. 5
      Edouard
      190
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!