Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3: The Review


Recommended Posts

Single-Player

To start the discussion on single-player, I would like to say that MW3 resembles both of its predecessors. In a lot of way. Either for good or for bad. We all know how InfinityWard rediscovered the FPS games which were lost in WWII and with that game, they gave players a breakthrough single-player and an exciting, rewarding and something entirely new experience in multi-player, which is why there are still people playing the game even after 4 years.

2009 marked the height of series (at least in financial way ), with Modern Warfare 2 delivering a new experience with Single-player, adding spec-ops to the package and giving an exciting multi-player (for consoles) to the players. Many people I talked to said that t was a step down, in the single-player part, from Modern Warfare but nonetheless, it was quite good fun even if the story wasn't intriguing, it still got many positive reviews.

Now comes the last (presumably) part of the trilogy which brings an end to the main story.

The engine is the same old one here, no surprise here. They haven't even changed the fonts of the game and menu designs. I don't know how to put this but I was expecting something more from a game that is going to be the successor of the best selling game.

The story picks up where the previous one left, just, literally, after some minutes, where Soap and Price after killing Shepherd are going to a safe house of Nikolai'. There Soap survives and so begins the hunt for Makarov who has triggered multiple full scale attacks across the Europe and USA. And this is what its all about, really. Kill Makarov. Which isn't a bad thing entirely though.

The campaign design, levels are very similar to its predecessor. But there is something different to it.

e.g. the large scale battle are great and provide good fun, although playing on hardest difficulty, I found myself dying a lot, three bullets is all it takes.

Aside from these large scale battles, they have included some new weapons to the game. Besides this, there isn't much to say here. You are taken from USA to Europe and back to USA and the missions are familiar. Extremely familiar.

It took me approximately 8 hours to finish the campaign and frankly, it wasn't as disappointing as I anticipated it to be. Better in some ways and worse in others, it left an overall positive impression.

The ending is epic, really. I was stunned by the ending design. I wasn't hoping for something like that but still it was damn good.

Campaign is short, bear in mind. It isn't long and it should've been but there's nothing we can do about it

8.5 out of 10

Special-Ops

There are two modes when it comes to spec-ops, survival and missions. There are about 15-20 in each section and can be played solo or with a friend. I've played some solely and I found it to be a lot of fun.

Survival mode, especially, is really fun and it gives the player complete control over the map with weapons armoury, killstreak rewards and else.

As you level up you unlock new weapons, which can be bought within the game. You unlock new perks and killstreak rewards to tackle the difficult enemies.

At higher levels, the enemies turn surprisingly difficult. They hide behind cover, throw grenades at you and will show aggressive behaviour.

I was able to get to the 22nd wave in the first map of survival mode and by then, it becomes almost impossible to handle them alone.

Missions, too are a great fun to be had. Some are really nice and are derivatives from single-player campaign. Some of them are really challenging and extremely fun.

9.25 out of 10

Multi-Player

Its a no brainer that games these days are designed to deliver a good multi-player experience, reagardless of how good or bad the single-player experience is.

But things have changed since the early days of the franchise and they hardly focus on single-player now. Its almost all about the multi-player :(

But, for me, its hard to swallow, given the history of the franchise, known for delivering excellent and long single-player campaigns.

But I guess this is where everyone is headed these days.

Multi-player in Modern Warfare 3 is a lot similar in many ways to its predecessor and different in a lot of ways too.

To state the obvious similarities, hmmm... lets say, the same engine, the same action packed, fast paced gameplay. And above all, the same font.

But there are changes made in multi-player which makes it more diverse, if you may, than ever.

For starters, there is an excellent addition of weapon customization, which to me is great addition. It gives you complete control of the weapon and is quite helpful in many ways.

Then there are three classes, which are great too. All of them have their own ups and downs and none of them feels over-powered. The balance is just right.

The new game mode kill confirmed is as exciting as it sounds. Its great, if you ask me. It creates a sense of immersion among the players and tell them that to win, you just can't sit in a corner and camp. You have to constantly move to win.

Then there is a new mode in which a movable flag is to be captured and held by the team as long as they can. It, to me, is the first time the franchise has put emphasis on teamwork and this mode here is all about teamwork. I really, really enjoyed this mode.

The rest is the usual Call of Duty experience you've come to like or hate. There isn't really much to it but what is, is great and in my opinion, dare I say, this is the best multi-player experience to date from the franchise, on par or besting the original one.

The game has 16 newly designed maps which are good, for the most part. Some of them are really good ones and the shortness of them really makes the player stay attentive all the time.

The new point streak system is good too. It is good for new players but not too good for the experts of the series.

I haven't had the chance to play with Call of Duty Elite but a friend of mine (on Xbox) says that its great.

8.75 out of 10

The Verdict

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a good game in many ways. Yes it is awful lot similar to its predecessor which is both in its good and in its bad.

The same old engine is what bugs me the most. Then there is the things which might only be a problem to me is that the formula sticks extremely similar to its predecessors. These proven-mechanics are good for some but not for all. There is a handsome amount of money they ask and I don't think the price tag justifies some additions. For this price, we should get something different, not some additions.[/left]

Nonetheless, it is a great addition to the series which gives a good campaign, excellent spec-ops and great multi-player.

8.75 out of 10

Great Post Mohammed!

Thanks. Appreciate the feedback (Y)

Dear lord - 22 waves is where you died on that first level?

friend and i could only get to wave 4 when we started playing last night

On the first map. It was my third attempt.

I just finished it. The story was good, but i didn't like the fact the 3rd party character... Frost? Didn't have a real connection to Soap nor Price. I like how in MW2, you either played as either and they end up having much respect as we can see at the mid-point of the game.

I just finished it. The story was good, but i didn't like the fact the 3rd party character... Frost? Didn't have a real connection to Soap nor Price. I like how in MW2, you either played as either and they end up having much respect as we can see at the mid-point of the game.

Yeah, but I guess Sandman was pretty close to Price so that's one way of looking at it

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Honestly that feels even more useless than it did when Win11 was first released. In 2021, the uproar was somewhat justified, but only when comparing how good we've had it since Windows 7. Prior to that, a new Windows release would often require new, or very recent hardware. Windows XP wouldn't run (in any usable way) on hardware released when it's predecessor Win98 was released (let's ignore ME). It was time to shift the goal post, and the way Microsoft did that was actually ok. People have still had another FIVE YEARS of free software support with Windows 10, and those of us who want to have used these tools to bypass the limitations, all while understanding the impacts that may have. Most laptops don't last 5 years (sadly), so now the youngest unsupported hardware is 9 years old, and apparently has another year of support with Windows 10. That's good. Meanwhile, understanding the impacts and limitations, I have my 2013 laptop running Win11 perfectly fine. The thing that's failing on it is the hardware, the 2.5" SATA cable/chip is failing and corrupting the SSDs I put in. Thankfully it has a functional M.2 sata drive that works fine!
    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!