2011 VGA reveals


Recommended Posts

Generals 2 and The Last of Us were great. Otherwise, wasted time watching all this junk.

The trailers for Mass Effect 3 and Diablo 3 were great. Generals 2 wins it in my books. That reveal blew me away.

I lied reveal of the night Batman Arkham World script from Joker character of the year award.

bull**** to many bugs to be given GOTY. I guess Rocksteady is just gonna have to show everyone up again with the next Batman game and finally take it home.

I was digging Alan Wake honestly.

I am also psyched that they FINALLY are releasing the original Tony Hawks in HD. I thought this was something that should have done years ago. Apparently it will be classic levels from THPS1&2, and will be under $20.

As far as that Epic game Fortnite, just not my cup of tea it seems pretty clear.

The Last Of Us really had me most excited from a "bigger" game perspective.

And I just watched Rising. Looks pretty bad ass.

First RTS in Frostbite = Win.

And hardly overkill.

So far, the same engine has been used in a shooter (BF3 of course) and two racing games (HP 2010 and NFS - The Run). Also, CryEngine3 has been used in two MMOs (one of which is F2P, no less). What would be a shocker would be the use of CryEngine 3 in a racing game.

Apparently MGS is going hack and slash. What a joke for the final reveal.

That information is not knew. There have been various trailers and gameplay videos released for MGS Rising for several years now. I was hoping we'd finally get a release date. Seeing how this is one of the first ever MGS games that was supposed to be released for the pc I've been watching for news on it closely for a while.

That information is not knew. There have been various trailers and gameplay videos released for MGS Rising for several years now. I was hoping we'd finally get a release date. Seeing how this is one of the first ever MGS games that was supposed to be released for the pc I've been watching for news on it closely for a while.

O, so then why if this is such a major break from the series is it so liked? I mean if splinter cell all the sudden played like CoD the fan base would go nuts.

O, so then why if this is such a major break from the series is it so liked? I mean if splinter cell all the sudden played like CoD the fan base would go nuts.

What do you mean? From what I've seen and read about the game it isn't only supposed to be hack'n'slash, you don't have to play it that way. But that information is old and dates back as far as 2009, I haven't seen anything from this vga which was supposed to be some sort of big reveal.

And I can't say why others like it, I can only go on what I've seen and that is cutting **** up in brutal fashion and kicking all kinds of ass. What's not to like?

The trailers for Mass Effect 3 and Diablo 3 were great. Generals 2 wins it in my books. That reveal blew me away.

ME 3 gameplay trailer was cool!

Speaking of Generals....is it made by Bioware? Very strange!

Fortnite by Epic games doesnt look too exciting sadly.

And hardly overkill.

So far, the same engine has been used in a shooter (BF3 of course) and two racing games (HP 2010 and NFS - The Run). Also, CryEngine3 has been used in two MMOs (one of which is F2P, no less). What would be a shocker would be the use of CryEngine 3 in a racing game.

Not really sure how it'd be shocking at all.

Frostbite is being leveraged by EA because they own DICE, hence they own the engine, hence they don't have to pay royalties. If they owned Crytek and not DICE, I'm sure we'd be seeing CryENGINE 3 powering all their games.

Not really sure how it'd be shocking at all.

Frostbite is being leveraged by EA because they own DICE, hence they own the engine, hence they don't have to pay royalties. If they owned Crytek and not DICE, I'm sure we'd be seeing CryENGINE 3 powering all their games.

Don't they own Crytek too..?

EA Partners and Crytek had a publishing agreement for Crysis 2, much like what they had with id for Rage before id was purchased by Bethesda/Zenimax. (I would have used Valve as an example, but their partnership with EA Partners is much different -- EA doesn't fund them, so there's no cross-branding. In other words, they just make the physical copies for Valve since they already have the systems in place for physical publishing. It's why you don't see an EA logo in Valve's games. Kind of a tangent...)

I don't think it's a multi-game agreement. Crytek is also making games for THQ (Homefront 2) and Microsoft (Ryse).

EA Partners and Crytek had a publishing agreement for Crysis 2, much like what they had with id for Rage before id was purchased by Bethesda/Zenimax. (I would have used Valve as an example, but their partnership with EA Partners is much different -- EA doesn't fund them, so there's no cross-branding. In other words, they just make the physical copies for Valve since they already have the systems in place for physical publishing. It's why you don't see an EA logo in Valve's games. Kind of a tangent...)

I don't think it's a multi-game agreement. Crytek is also making games for THQ (Homefront 2) and Microsoft (Ryse).

I was referring more to their respective game engines (Frostbite 2 and CryEngine 3).

Both engines are not just multiplatform, but highly versatile; remember, CryEngine 3 will have been used for two MMOs (one of which is F2P) before Ryse even goes into closed beta.

And because (unlike Frostbite 2), CryEngine 3 is not tied to a specific publisher, it is a great deal more leveragable by both developers and publishers than Frostbite 2.

The days of the single-platform (let alone single-purpose) game engine are pretty much done (except for indie development - and maybe even there, too, with free SDKs such as the one for CryEngine 3).

Not really sure how it'd be shocking at all.

Frostbite is being leveraged by EA because they own DICE, hence they own the engine, hence they don't have to pay royalties. If they owned Crytek and not DICE, I'm sure we'd be seeing CryENGINE 3 powering all their games.

But could you see GRiD2 or TDU3 using CryEngine 3?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!