TP-Link WN722N(C) 150Mbps Wireless USB Adapter


Recommended Posts

I did this review a few months ago, but I am only now posting it here as well!

May be a bit of a boring review this since there isn't much to talk about really :p, but I shall post my thoughts anyway :p and I hope that this helps people who are looking for a new wireless adapter :)

Needed a new wireless adapter to replace a spare one (WG111T) that I was using, which was rubbish, was getting disconnects every so often especially when loading image intensive web pages/threads and dll.

Not only did it cut my internet out but it seemed to disconnect the wireless router completely as well (netgear Wireless-G Router WGR614 v9), meaning anything connected to the wireless router was also disconnected i.e. my android mobile and my brothers internet and the only way to get back on was to reset the router.

So I got this adapter for ?10 and I am very impressed with it considering the cost.

Mini Review of the TP-Link WN722N? 150Mbps Wireless USB Adapter

20icdjk.jpg

t8otap.jpg

First Thoughts:

The build quality of this adapter is pretty good I have to say, on the front it is a glossy white plastic and half of it at the back is a rougher black plastic. On one side you have a QSS button (also known as wi-fi protected set-up button) and on the other side you have an adjustable and removable antenna, which boosts the signal range and strength and is a much better method as opposed to some of the other adapters that just have a metal strip on the inside.

1sy64j.jpg

And here is a pic to try and give you a rough idea of the size:

izpcnq.jpg

On the front under the white plastic you have a green LED activity indicator, which is perfectly fine, not really bright like some others were it becomes very distracting especially in a dark room.

kapmif.jpg

zk5qw5.jpg

The cradle is just a basic stand where you plug the wireless adapter into and have it sit on your desk or you can directly plug the wireless adapter into the USB port at the back of your computer or at the front if you want.

The cradle is finished with the same white glossy plastic that is used on the front of the wireless adapter. It has some type of foam padding on the underside to give it some grip.

My main complaint about this cradle/desk stand is that it isn't heavy enough so easily moves around despite the foam padding on the underside.

wpdvc.jpg

The USB lead with the cradle is pretty long and should be plenty for most average sized desks.

Installation:

Was very easy, the instructions are very clear and easy to understand for newbies, there is an image for each step showing what you do/click on and they keep it very brief.

I had no problems what so ever, simply;

- uninstall old netgear drivers

- remove netgear adapter

- put new adapter in

- put CD in

- choose my model and click install

- finish

And that was it, ready to connect to the internet.

Windows 7 64 bit ultimate is my OS.

However during installation, I got a pop-up saying that the "utility software" could not be installed due to my OS (W7 Ultimate 64 bit), only the drivers could be installed.

Essentially the "utility software" is just a fancy looking control panel for your adapter settings (like with the ATI and nvidia control panels), which will have a few more options for you to mess around with, but can still be done within windows anyway, maybe just not as easy to find the options.

I had a look on the website to see if there is a later version of the utility available and there may be as usually the drivers etc. that are supplied on the disc are older versions.

http://www.tp-link.c...ersion=V1#tbl_b

And a quick glimpse of what it looks like to give you an idea:

http://www.tp-link.c...article/?id=351

I personally will be leaving it for now (as everything I need the adapter to do, works perfectly fine), may try it out at some point in the future though and update my review with some info/thoughts on the utility software side of things :)

Tests:

I ran some tests with my old adapter and the new adapter pretty much within the same time period and also ran them both twice so both tests are pretty fair.

PingTest:

NetGear Adapter:

madmyu.png140lvdj.png

TP-Link adapter:

wu5ni1.png2py5i0o.png

SpeedTest:

NetGear Adapter:

1543395376.png1543481119.png

TP-Link Adapter:

1543508650.png1543510523.png

The ping is high for both adapters for the speedtest as someone had utorrent on at the same time (although hardly any bandwidth was being taken up by it) for those tests.

Here is one that I did with the new adapter when utorrent was deactivated on one of the other PCs:

1543686955.png

Ping to my Router:

I also just did another speedtest before the router ping test:

1545335410.png

103y2j9.png

Signal Strength:

With the NetGear adapter according to the windows 7 sidebar gadget called network meter, the signal strength was usually around 20-30%, with the TP-Link adapter it is around 75-80%, both were placed in the same position and the wireless signals have to go through 2 pretty thick walls.

However the adapter (TP-Link) is beside my second monitor and the other day I moved my monitor back a wee bit, out of the way and the signal now ranges from 85%-98% all the time.

Signal at the minute:

35n22bo.png

With this TP-Link adapter I am now picking up 7 wifi spots as opposed to only 1 (which was mine :p) with the netgear adapter and with my older US robotics adapter, it only picked up about 3 iirc.

Note:

The ping and speed tests were done at the stated signal strengths above.

Conclusion:

So far very impressed with this adapter, and in all honesty I really can't state any cons for it at all apart from the cradle being too light weighted. For the price it just seems great, if it were at a higher price point above ?20 then I would expect a better signal strength, as in constant 100% and slightly better build quality.

The only thing, which I would have preferred is for all the white to be black instead and a blue LED for the activity.

If I had to buy another wireless adapter or/and someone that I knew said that they needed a new one, I would diff get this again/recommend this to them.

Hope you all liked the mini review and if anyone has any questions or would like something to be explained a bit better, just ask :)

  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!