Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I set up a domain controller in Windows Server 2008 R2 in an old computer that I'm fooling around with at home. Long story short, after some time, the motherboard fried and I couldn't put the HDD into another box because it wouldn't start the OS because of different hardware.

I didn't have a secondary DC and didn't have any useful backups, although the HDD was in perfect running condition. Eventually I was able to boot up the OS in vmware directly from the HDD then create a secondary DC on a new physical machine, promote it to the primary, then demote the old primary DC. This was a long, tedius process and was wondering what the best practices are for backing up servers and domain controllers.

I know 2k8 R2 has Windows Server Backup, but I've also heard some good things about 3rd party solutions like Acronis or EaseUS. Is there an easier way to backup a domain controller in the event of a hardware failure (hdd or otherwise)?

Aside from having a secondary DC, what is the best solution for backing up DCs?

My setup is basically a Microsoft Hyper-V server and it serves:

Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise edition

Windows 2008 R2 Standard edition (minimal install which acts as a secondary DC/Back up)

Windows 7 for doing dev stuff and work.

And the easiest solution would be to keep active back ups of the VHD files.

Depending how old the computer is and if it has a processor that has hardware virtual processor support and if you have enough memory (4GB might be enough). You could just run a config like mine, minus the Windows 7 dev environment.

I would recommend getting Acronis with the plugins (Universal Restore and De-duplication) and automate the backup and validations of those backups. Then make sure you store them on a NAS or SAN and offline/offsite. This would in a really bad situation allow you to recover to new hardware by being able to do a bare metal restore, or recover only what you need from the partitions to the actual files if needed. The best thing is you can encrypt the backups and have them stored wherever you want without worrying about your disk be damaged over time with products like Ghost.

My setup is basically a Microsoft Hyper-V server and it serves:

Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise edition

Windows 2008 R2 Standard edition (minimal install which acts as a secondary DC/Back up)

Windows 7 for doing dev stuff and work.

And the easiest solution would be to keep active back ups of the VHD files.

Depending how old the computer is and if it has a processor that has hardware virtual processor support and if you have enough memory (4GB might be enough). You could just run a config like mine, minus the Windows 7 dev environment.

Nice was looking at this setup also. Will be looking into this more!

I would recommend getting Acronis with the plugins (Universal Restore and De-duplication) and automate the backup and validations of those backups. Then make sure you store them on a NAS or SAN and offline/offsite. This would in a really bad situation allow you to recover to new hardware by being able to do a bare metal restore, or recover only what you need from the partitions to the actual files if needed. The best thing is you can encrypt the backups and have them stored wherever you want without worrying about your disk be damaged over time with products like Ghost.

This is exactly what I was going to say. If it is just a domain controller and not an exchange server then acronis is the perfect choice.

However, if you plan on making it an exchange 2010 server in the future, invest in a different solution, like, backup exec. Because acronis does not support exchange 2010.

I would recommend getting Acronis with the plugins (Universal Restore and De-duplication) and automate the backup and validations of those backups. Then make sure you store them on a NAS or SAN and offline/offsite. This would in a really bad situation allow you to recover to new hardware by being able to do a bare metal restore, or recover only what you need from the partitions to the actual files if needed. The best thing is you can encrypt the backups and have them stored wherever you want without worrying about your disk be damaged over time with products like Ghost.

Ok so here's my dilemma. Either I didn't perform the backups or recoveries properly or Acronis Universal Restore does not work the way I expect it to. I didn't have any backups of the DC before the motherboard crash, but after the crash, I put the harddrive into another computer and booted the computer off an Acronis Boot CD to back up the OS partition in hopes that I could use the Universal Restore to restore it so it could be used in the new tower. But it didn't work. This was a while ago, so I can't quote the exact steps I took, but I racked my brains trying a lot of different ways to recover the OS partition to different hardware.

I'm not sure if it made a difference but the old (dead) computer was a dell optiplex and the new computer is a dell vostro, which is a workstation PC, so there are no drivers specifically for windows server OSs, but the win7 64bit drivers work fine for the chipset on server 2008 r2. Either way, i tried a lot of different things and could not, for the life of me, get acronis to restore the backups to the different hardware.

My setup is basically a Microsoft Hyper-V server and it serves:

Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise edition

Windows 2008 R2 Standard edition (minimal install which acts as a secondary DC/Back up)

Windows 7 for doing dev stuff and work.

And the easiest solution would be to keep active back ups of the VHD files.

Depending how old the computer is and if it has a processor that has hardware virtual processor support and if you have enough memory (4GB might be enough). You could just run a config like mine, minus the Windows 7 dev environment.

I've never used Hyper-V before (or heard of it for that matter). I was doing some quick reading about it -- so essentially, its a role that you install on server 2008 r2 that allows you to run virtual DCs? Then you just keep backups of the VMs? This sounds interesting.

When you run the backup for the first time try doing it from inside the operating system to check for issues, I've had no problems doing backups from the bootcd or inside the operating system. I would recommend backing up the entire disk as at times Windows installs extra on other partitions (you will notice this if there is a small amount of MBs being used up after installation, without backing up this partition normally a FAT32 partition then the system will not boot from restore but still allow you to restore files from within Acronis while booted into the operating system).

I've never used Hyper-V before (or heard of it for that matter). I was doing some quick reading about it -- so essentially, its a role that you install on server 2008 r2 that allows you to run virtual DCs? Then you just keep backups of the VMs? This sounds interesting.

Not exactly. Yes, Hyper-V can be installed as a role, but you can also download Hyper-V server edition which is basically a very basic install with Hyper-V which you then manage from either that computer or another and you can add VM's to it and manage them remotely. This is a good solution as if you back up the VHD's and the Hyper-V server goes down, you can transfer them to another Hyper-V server without risk of installing or damaging the DC environment. Or if you ever upgraded to another computer, the VM's could be transferred to the new computer without much fuss.

Edit: If I remember correctly, Hyper-V server edition is free as well, but I'm not sure if that's changed.

yep, seems like it's free: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/hyper-v-server/default.aspx

This seems like a much better solution. So do I have to use VMware or does MS have it's own virtualization software?

Would it be easy to back up the current server 2008 R2 installation and restore it to a VHD inside hyper-v?

What a surprise that you mentioned easeus. I notice it when just fooling around the Download.cnet and wanna find me one remarkable backup software. After reviewing what others say about it. I decide to download its free version for a try.

So amazed to find it provides so many backup functions i need, like system backup, disk/partition backup,schedule backup as well as incremental/differential. Disk clone successfully help me to upgrade my older and small disk to a larger and brand-new hard disk. I like.

Therefore, I think its server version also would be awesome two. And i know that windows server backup in w2k8 is able to backup data. But it might be much better to use one really professional. What's more, I just received its email, saying now it has made another upgrade - new interface as well as more improved functions. You might go to its website: http://www.todo-backup.com

Thanks!

A RAID setup helps to protect you from Hard Drive Failure, but is completely useless if something goes horribly wrong inside the OS (won't boot or corrupted/deleted data).

You need restore points to go back in time to restore the OS or retrieve individual files.

I am running a VMware vSphere 5.0 High Availability Cluster (SAN) at Work with Veeam Backup & Replication 6.0 backing up to our Main PC (Windows Server 2008 R2). SugarSync Online Backup uploads the Incremental Restore Points offsite (in case of a Catastrophic Failure).

Overkill for most users (also, kinda pricey), but I am loving it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!