anyone recommend a good sound card?

By roguekiller23231
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Community Regular

roguekiller23231

Posted
Posted

a few weeks ago i began to experience problems with my on board sound, later discovered (after a lot of messages to the customer support for my mobo) that a capacitor that i had discovered at the bottom of my case was the cause of all my issues, i must have knocked it off during one of my through cleans of the case.

but anyway, i'm in the market for a new sound card and i'm lost with all the choices.

it will be used with 5.1 speakers, PCI-E connection is proffered because the only PCI slot i have is covered up by my graphics card, and finally, has to be under ?45.

so anyone got any recommendations?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1049465-anyone-recommend-a-good-sound-card/
Share on other sites
Proficient

CUBBYJR2005

Posted
Posted

Nothing good comes to my mind with PCI-E in that price range (I'd stay away from Creative, as the result of their drivers). If you can somehow free a PCI slot, ASUS Xonar DS is a good option for that price range.

sorry disagree and all drivers have bugs not just creative.

Veteran

Alwaysonacoffebreak

Posted
Posted

a few weeks ago i began to experience problems with my on board sound, later discovered (after a lot of messages to the customer support for my mobo) that a capacitor that i had discovered at the bottom of my case was the cause of all my issues, i must have knocked it off during one of my through cleans of the case.

but anyway, i'm in the market for a new sound card and i'm lost with all the choices.

it will be used with 5.1 speakers, PCI-E connection is proffered because the only PCI slot i have is covered up by my graphics card, and finally, has to be under ?45.

so anyone got any recommendations?

Your graphics card is in PCI and You want an PCI-E soundcard? Now that doesn't make sense. Rather save some money, buy a decent PCI-E gfx card and the PCI soundcards are like 10-15 euros for the cheaper ones.

Community Regular

roguekiller23231

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Your graphics card is in PCI and You want an PCI-E soundcard? Now that doesn't make sense. Rather save some money, buy a decent PCI-E gfx card and the PCI soundcards are like 10-15 euros for the cheaper ones.

:rolleyes:

pci is 'covered up'

it's an xfx 6970, if thats not decent, reccomend a better one? :laugh:

it's a double slot card, the PCI-Ex16 slot is taken up by the card, the one inder it is also taken up by it's cooler, and thats the PCI slot.

Grand Master

LaP

Posted
Posted

The best ones are from creative the company.

I would not touch Creative SC with a 10 meters long stick.

I still have my Creative X-Fi Platinum as a paper weight. The card is not broken. It never actually worked properly. Could not return it to the store cause since Creative blamed everyone at first and did not acknowledge the problem i thought some drivers update or MB change would resolve the situation and when i finally understood that the problem was the card and creative it was too late.

Cretive always blamed everyone for the crackle/pop debacle. Yet i try this SC in every new computer i get and it's still not working properly. Still waiting for a recall and a working card ... you know this is what good companies do when they ship products that are not working. But well it's Creative ...

I would buy a SC by Auzentech or Asus.

I curently own a Auzentech X-Fi Prelude 7.1 (same X-Fi chipset as the Platinum by Creative) and it works perfectly. Good sound card but i think it's disc now.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

I would not touch Creative SC with a 10 meters long stick.

I still have my Creative X-Fi Platinum as a paper weight. The card is not broken. It never actually worked properly. Could not return it to the store cause since Creative blamed everyone at first and did not acknowledge the problem i thought some drivers update or MB change would resolve the situation and when i finally understood that the problem was the card and creative it was too late.

Cretive always blamed everyone for the crackle/pop debacle. Yet i try this SC in every new computer i get and it's still not working properly. Still waiting for a recall and a working card ... you know this is what good companies do when they ship products that are not working. But well it's Creative ...

I would buy a SC by Auzentech or Asus.

I curently own a Auzentech X-Fi Prelude 7.1 (same X-Fi chipset as the Platinum by Creative) and it works perfectly. Good sound card but i think it's disc now.

And you are basically saying that it's the *drivers* - not the hardware.

Creative manufactures the hardware, and supplies it to third parties as well (including ASUS) - the only difference is the drivers.

I have the PCI (low-profile) version of the X-Fi XtremeGamer, and have had exactly zero issues with driver support from Creative - I've had it, in fact, since 2005.

What's different between me and all the folks that have had issues?

I've asked that very question of folks that say that they have had issues, and haven't gotten a clear answer yet.

It's been seven years - and the clock still ticks.

Grand Master

Miuku.

Posted
Posted

I still have an Audigy 1, Audigy 2 and an X-Fi and not a single one of them have caused me any issues in the past, Audigy 1 shipping drivers were problematic with some games but those were pretty swiftly fixed.

In reality, the PC hardware landscape is so insane that almost every manufacturer has or has had issues at some point, bigger or smaller.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

I still have an Audigy 1, Audigy 2 and an X-Fi and not a single one of them have caused me any issues in the past, Audigy 1 shipping drivers were problematic with some games but those were pretty swiftly fixed.

In reality, the PC hardware landscape is so insane that almost every manufacturer has or has had issues at some point, bigger or smaller.

True story - I have an HDTV Wonder (old TV tuner card from the XP days). It was EOL'd a few years back, but it's still supported - even the WDP supports it.

Why it's still in use - it's an ATSC OTA TV tuner card that works with most software for the purpose (regardless of OS), especially Windows Media Center.

The only issue it has is that it is very address-picky and doesn't share I/O addresses nicely (it's actually pickier than Creative's sound cards - which are notorious blame-getters),

I have the HDTV Wonder *and* the X-Fi I mentioned before in the same computer.

The issue on getting them to work together is slot ordering (making sure that neither has a conflict with another device in the address or I/O range it uses). While it's hard with ATX motherboards (the standard when both cards were manufactured), it's much harder with mATX, let alone ITX (fewer slots available, and more are shared). PCIe x1 has it no easier.

It's also why I'm going back to ATX for my next motherboard - to ease the address deconfliction issue (not merely with PCI, but with PCIe x1 as well) going forward.

Grand Master

LaP

Posted
Posted

And you are basically saying that it's the *drivers* - not the hardware.

Creative manufactures the hardware, and supplies it to third parties as well (including ASUS) - the only difference is the drivers.

I have the PCI (low-profile) version of the X-Fi XtremeGamer, and have had exactly zero issues with driver support from Creative - I've had it, in fact, since 2005.

What's different between me and all the folks that have had issues?

I've asked that very question of folks that say that they have had issues, and haven't gotten a clear answer yet.

It's been seven years - and the clock still ticks.

Don't think it's the drivers cause Auzentech is using a sligthly modified version of Creative ones (unless Auzentech did something to prevent the crackle/pop issue but i doubt it). Not the chipset either cause my Auzentech card is using the same chipset.

Dunno. Defintely not the MB chipset as i experienced this on 2 different MBs (DFI with nVidia chipset and ASUS with intel chipset). Not the OS either.

Honestly it's hard to tell cause Creative itself doesn't know.

On Windows 7 with my new MB using the lastest drivers it's not as worse as it was on windows xp and my old MB but i still get some crackle/pop here and there while listening to music or movies.

Not the first problem i have with a piece of HW i buy so it's okay but the support offered by Creative was one of the worst i ever experienced honestly. If you don't know what the problem is then don't say it's the MB chipset and say that maybe the card is the problem and people should return it asap.

Apprentice

ranmas

Posted
Posted

Creative or other wise there is not a lot of companies too chose between in the sound card arena for the pc.

My selection is baised upon what the computer is going to be used for. If you are going to game on it then there is really onl y one choice, and that is creative. Windows 7 and open al may be changing this fact of life creative still has the advantage of being the only card to support all of eax's features. Even if that is only because it is their tech. A lot of games are still out there that only work well with eax. So creative gets the win there.

However if your looking at music content creation or some other usage then creative is not the best rout to go. Several people have listed very good companies for sound cards in this thread already, and you would just need too putin a bitof research as too what one would be the best for you.

However the fact that you need it too be an express card also points to creative, as they are the only ones that I can think of with a good express card. Others were talking about getting them out too market, but I do not know if they have done so yet. As I have not needed a new card for a while. In case your wondering I have the express version of the xf-i titanium.

Typing on a tablet is not always fun or easy. Sent from a asus tranformer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Michal H. · Posted

      Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26

      By Copernic · Posted

      TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Anyone Here With Turbo Pascal Experience?

      By +virtorio · Posted

      Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!