Recommended Posts

Upgraded to 8GB from 4GB not too long ago, largely due to BF 3, as with the game and chrome or firefox, origin running and the general AV, firewall etc. I was hitting 97% physical usage and alt tabbing out was a nightmare and would get stuttering every so often in game, made a massive difference and in general the whole system for daily things feels sooooo much better now, word documents and PDF files load instantly and this is with just a mechanical hard drive (samsung F3) :D

Besides, it is very cheap now a days, so might as well!

I keep thinking that too many people here are still stuck on some computer myths of yesterday. You WANT to have most of your ram full if possible, and yes, you want to have as much ram as possible. Also, lots of cheap slower ram > less but faster expensive ram. If you think that having 90% ram usage is bad, you are mistaken. Those same individuals probably think Vista and Win 7 are bad compared to earlier versions too.

if you got 4GB there is no real reason in most cases to upgrade.

but if you get it dirt cheap-ish having 8GB will pretty much guarantee you will never have RAM issues. if you do, by then that PC will be ancient and it won't really matter then.

p.s. i still have 2GB and i would definitely benefit if i went to 4GB but since i got the older style DDR400 (PC3200) type that stuff is expensive vs the faster types of RAM nowadays which don't make sense. but i could definitely tell my general use of PC would benefit going from 2GB to 4GB but i suspect once you hit 4GB there will be minimal AT BEST increases going over that in most cases unless you like running a ton of completely unnecessary programs which is more of a luxury thing and not really needed. because for general cases with web browser and some other fairly basic programs open and say one game open i doubt 4GB would be a issue in most cases. but even if it slightly was a issue you could just simply close the browser before loading the game and your fine.

I keep thinking that too many people here are still stuck on some computer myths of yesterday. You WANT to have most of your ram full if possible, and yes, you want to have as much ram as possible. Also, lots of cheap slower ram > less but faster expensive ram. If you think that having 90% ram usage is bad, you are mistaken. Those same individuals probably think Vista and Win 7 are bad compared to earlier versions too.

Yes! One thing anyone can do is see how much ram their system is using on idle. Then load a vm that will use almost ALL their ram. Turn off the vm and notice the ram drop and look how much the system uses when idle then. It should be lower!

Question: do you have an SSD or a traditional HDD?

Why do I ask? Well, my laptop has an SSD RAID0, and 4GB of RAM. Windows 7 disables the caching stuff by itself (since it doesn't really provide any benifits on an SSD), which leaves me with an awful lot of REAL free memory all the time. For me, 4GB has always been enough, even while doing software development with a Linux VM open in Virtualbox.

Now on my desktop with a traditional HDD I do feel that 4GB tends not to be enough from time to time.

Depends on what you use the computer for really. I found that with some games upgrading from 4 gigs helped a bit. Also DDR3 is really, really cheap right now.

Superfetch definitely will make full use of 8 gigs.

I actually upgraded from 8 to 16 gigs recently lol. didn't really need to but the same memory I had in my machine was on sale for 35 dollars and I thought why not. I really need to unsubscribe from those newegg emails, they keep making me buy things!

If you think that having 90% ram usage is bad, you are mistaken. Those same individuals probably think Vista and Win 7 are bad compared to earlier versions too.

Sorry, but when you are hitting 90+% physical usage (even 80% I consider high), you notice big time the entire system slowing down/lagging, especially when running demanding applications e.g. bf 3

And once you are hitting this point, then more RAM is needed.

I never upgrade for the sake of it, only when I really need to, just look at the rest of my rig in sig.

Myself and plenty of other people on overclockers.co.uk have upgraded from 4GB to 8GB due to the same reasons that I listed above and below and have also noticed the exact same outcome as me.

With only 4GB and just BF 3, origin, firefox or chrome and my AV, firewall, dropbox, sidebar etc. in the background running, every thing was soooooo choppy and slow and alt tabing out made my system hang to the point that I thought it had crashed, during game, I would get a few seconds of the game pausing/stuttering really badly.

As soon as 8GB was put in, all of the above was much better, no more problems and according to task manager, 5+GB was being used in total when playing BF 3.

It is the same with android, you get people saying that free RAM is wasted etc. however when you have a crappy mobile that only has 150MB of RAM and as soon as it goes below 30MB free, the entire things lags and takes like 1 minute to launch the dialer etc. and sometimes due to this, even shuts down.

As for the people that say close browsers etc. not everyone wants to do this or/and sees why they should have to especially with BF 3 as you need the browser open for the voice, party, server features and some will even need team speak, procon etc. open for clan play.

With 8GB+, you don't need to worry at all! ;)

To many people saying upgrade with no reasoning. If you're maxing out the current systems RAM then upgrade if you're not then don't bother!

Reason #1: http://www.newegg.com/Special/ShellShocker.aspx?cm_sp=ShellShocker-_-20-233-186-_-01182012_1

for me, i have a Intel Core 2 Quad and went from 4 gig to 8 gigs about 2 months ago because it was cheap. I hardly notice any different but what i do doesn't demand very much. But having said that, i Still glad i have the extra headroom when needed. If it was expensive, i probably would just keep 4, but for $20, its worth it to go to 8.

On 4gb at mo and its fine. Only game with any real load time is BF3 and even thats no more than about 60-90secs.

Tho I do plan on building a new system at end of the month and will be 16gb in to future proof my investment. At just under ?80 for 16gb its a steal considering to swap my 2x2gb sticks for 2x4gb sticks in my current system was ?200

I have 4gb myself but it's not bad at all because I can open 30 plus tabs and my computer still operates smoothly. I would like to upgrade but it would cost me toomuch because I am using DDR2 and my motherboard doesn't support DDR3 therefore I wouldn't want to upgrade my entire system or upgrade to 8 ddr2 only to upgrade completely a few months later (this time with DDR3, new MB, CPU etc)...

I keep thinking that too many people here are still stuck on some computer myths of yesterday. You WANT to have most of your ram full if possible, and yes, you want to have as much ram as possible. Also, lots of cheap slower ram > less but faster expensive ram. If you think that having 90% ram usage is bad, you are mistaken. Those same individuals probably think Vista and Win 7 are bad compared to earlier versions too.

Nyet on that last comment - I upgraded to 7 *from* Vista (x64 at that), and dual-boot with the WDP on top of that. However, I also multitask constantly (and have since the days of Windows 2000 Professional - my first NT-based OS I ran instead of DOS/9x).

Running multiple applications (large to small) at once, and multicore processors means you are more likely to do exactly that (not less), along with the growing appetite of games and small applications for RAM (amusingly, at the same time, large applications and general OS *housekeeping* tasks are putting themselves on a diet), combined with DDR3 pricing that is FAR cheaper than DDR2 ever was at its cheapest (currently about $5 per gigabyte for general-purpose CL9 DDR3-1333 - even high-grade performance DDR3 is no worse than $7/GB, which is $3 less than general-purpose DDR2-800).

There are two - and only two - reasons NOT to go above 4 GB of RAM today - your motherboard takes DDR2 (price reasons) or your OS is not x64 (because your CPU is not x64 capable). If either (let alone both) are true, upgrade, upgrade, upgrade (at least your motherboard and CPU) - your applications WILL thank you.

I have 4gb myself but it's not bad at all because I can open 30 plus tabs and my computer still operates smoothly. I would like to upgrade but it would cost me toomuch because I am using DDR2 and my motherboard doesn't support DDR3 therefore I wouldn't want to upgrade my entire system or upgrade to 8 ddr2 only to upgrade completely a few months later (this time with DDR3, new MB, CPU etc)...

If you live near a MicroCenter (or purchase online - such as from Newegg or TigerDirect), you're running out of excuses.

I live near two MicroCenters (Fairfax, VA and Rockville, MD), and can buy an i5-K barebone (CPU/motherboard/RAM) for barely over $300 - and that is in-store and includes taxes (even in Maryland, which has a six percent sales-tax rate). The motherboard itself, while not high-end/enthusiast, is still based on the Z68 chipset, supports CrossFireX and is full-size ATX (ASUS P8Z68V-LX) - it will even support Ivy Bridge when the CPUs themselves become available.

Everything else (GPU, drives, case, etc.) stays put - I won't even need to reinstall Windows.

If you live near a MicroCenter (or purchase online - such as from Newegg or TigerDirect), you're running out of excuses.

I live near two MicroCenters (Fairfax, VA and Rockville, MD), and can buy an i5-K barebone (CPU/motherboard/RAM) for barely over $300 - and that is in-store and includes taxes (even in Maryland, which has a six percent sales-tax rate). The motherboard itself, while not high-end/enthusiast, is still based on the Z68 chipset, supports CrossFireX and is full-size ATX (ASUS P8Z68V-LX) - it will even support Ivy Bridge when the CPUs themselves become available.

Everything else (GPU, drives, case, etc.) stays put - I won't even need to reinstall Windows.

I live in Toronto, I have a decent system just the ram is low and I don't have SSD.. I'm getting ready to have a newer system by September with everything thats new on market...

  • 5 months later...

If you live near a MicroCenter (or purchase online - such as from Newegg or TigerDirect), you're running out of excuses.

I live near two MicroCenters (Fairfax, VA and Rockville, MD), and can buy an i5-K barebone (CPU/motherboard/RAM) for barely over $300 - and that is in-store and includes taxes (even in Maryland, which has a six percent sales-tax rate). The motherboard itself, while not high-end/enthusiast, is still based on the Z68 chipset, supports CrossFireX and is full-size ATX (ASUS P8Z68V-LX) - it will even support Ivy Bridge when the CPUs themselves become available.

Everything else (GPU, drives, case, etc.) stays put - I won't even need to reinstall Windows.

Hey one more thing, in Toronto Taxes are 13% and I don't know of any microcenters. But I think next year ill upgrade for sure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >Improved system sounds when using Windows in dark mode. The story behind that bug would be an interesting one.
    • Edifier S3000MKII hi-fi audiophile grade bookshelf speaker is at its lowest price now by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a bunch of Dolby Atmos soundbar deals with several ones from Sony, as well as from JBL, Samsung, Polk Audio, and more. You can check them out in this dedicated piece. Those are not audiophile category speakers though as they are built with home theater use in mind. If you are searching for the former then Edifier has its S3000MKII at its lowest price at the moment (purchase link under the specs table down below). This is a two-way bookshelf monitor speaker designed to produce accurate sound. While it may not produce the best high-fidelity audio possible out there, it should still be significantly better than what you will get on soundbars of this price range. As such it will do justice to high-res audio played back through it. The only thing that may feel lacking is sub-bass as Edifier claims the unit can go down to 38 Hz, which should be enough for studio monitor purposes, but not for deep room-shaking rumbling bass. Where this does excel though is in its treble reproduction. With its super-tweeter, it claims to go as high as 40 kHz in the frequency spectrum, which should offer a sense of "air"yness. This is an active speaker which means it packs its own amplfication. It has a top-notch Class D amp that may be able to rival many Class AB designs too in terms of sound reproduction quality. The technical specs of the Edifier S3000MKII are given in the table below: Specification Value RMS Output Power 256W RMS (Treble: 8W × 2, Mid-Low: 120W × 2) Tweeter Driver 107mm × 107mm Planar Magnetic Tweeter Mid-Low Driver 6.5-inch (179mm) Long-Throw Aluminum Diaphragm Driver Frequency Response 38Hz – 40kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio ≥ 85dB (A) Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth Codec Qualcomm® aptX™ HD Wireless Speaker Link Proprietary 5.8GHz wireless connection between speakers Supported Hi-Res Audio Hi-Res Audio Certified, up to 24-bit/192kHz Digital Processing XMOS XU216 Digital Signal Processor Audio Inputs Balanced XLR, Optical, Coaxial, USB Type-B, Line In, Bluetooth Input Sensitivity (USB) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Optical) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Coaxial) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Bluetooth) 450 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Balanced XLR) 1000 ± 50mV Input Sensitivity (Line In) 600 ± 50mV ADC Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DSP Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DIX Capability Up to 24-bit/216kHz DAC Capability Up to 32-bit/384kHz XMOS Processing Power Up to 2,000 MIPS Edifier S3000MKII Audiophile Active (Powered) Wireless Speakers: $799.99 (Sold by Edifier US, Shipped by Amazon US) If you do not have the kind of budget to spend on the S3000MKII, you can also check out the Edifier R1280Ts which is right now on sale at just $114 (its lowest price in a very long time). Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • > The G 7 Pro supports wireless (XBOX Wireless, proprietary dongle, or Bluetooth) If anybody else's brain translates this to 'it works wirelessly on Xbox', according to the linked product page, it does not.
    • Ignoring the fact that this "colony" kicked the empire of King George's arse during those early years... You are confusing the First Industrial Revolution (which was clearly pulled out of some butt-hurt Brit historian's arse after the fact) with the Second Industrial Revolution (aka now called the Technological Revolution, undoubtedly by that same butt-hurt Brit), which transitioned the world from the UK/UPS Empire to the USA as the world's only superpower. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution I hope you realize that I am having big fun here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!