Recommended Posts

KDE Plasma Workspaces, Applications and Platform 4.8 Improve User Experience

KDE is delighted to announce its latest set of releases, providing major updates to KDE Plasma Workspaces, KDE Applications, and the KDE Platform. Version 4.8 provides many new features, and improved stability and performance.

KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.8 Gain Adaptive Power Management

Highlights for Plasma Workspaces include Kwin optimizations, the redesign of power management, and integration with Activities. The first QtQuick-based Plasma widgets have entered the default installation of Plasma Desktop, with more to follow in future releases. Read the complete Plasma Workspaces Announcement.

KDE Applications 4.8 Offer Faster, More Scalable File Management

KDE applications released today include Dolphin with its new display engine, new Kate features and improvements, Gwenview with functional and visual improvements. KDE Telepathy reaches first beta milestone. Marble's new features keep arriving, among which are: Elevation Profile, satellite tracking and Krunner integration. Read the complete 'KDE Applications Announcement'.

KDE Platform 4.8 Enhances Interoperability, Introduces Touch-Friendly Components

KDE Platform provides the foundation for KDE software. KDE software is more stable than ever before. In addition to stability improvements and bugfixes, Platform 4.8 provides better tools for building fluid and touch-friendly user interfaces, integrates with other systems' password saving mechanisms and lays the base for more powerful interaction with other people using the new KDE Telepathy framework. For full details, read the KDE Platform 4.8 release announcement.

Source: KDE website

Download information: KDE SC 4.8.0 Info Page

Screenshot:

plasma-desktop-4.8.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1054021-kde-sc-48-released/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I cannot see why people "like" KDE. Too bulky and clunky for me.

To me its UI looks professional and its feature set is impressive. It sometimes get a bit too messy and it lacks a cohesive and organized approach to some parts of the settings and management of the desktop environment (it's called a DE, right? Sorry for any linux geeks If I got that wrong). But all in all it has its place in the linux world with its different goal in doing things than gnome. I also think it's slightly more familiar to windows users than gnome (but it could be only me).

To me its UI looks professional and its feature set is impressive. It sometimes get a bit too messy and it lacks a cohesive and organized approach to some parts of the settings and management of the desktop environment (it's called a DE, right? Sorry for any linux geeks If I got that wrong). But all in all it has its place in the linux world with its different goal in doing things than gnome. I also think it's slightly more familiar to windows users than gnome (but it could be only me).

It's not just you. Where Gnome has taken cues from Mac OS, KDE has taken several cues from Windows. For funzies, while Gnome users acknowledge that it takes cues from Mac OS, KDE users get a sandstorm in their gender-appropriate crevices whenever anyone points at something added to KDE just a few months after the same element was added to a version of Windows.

I'm in the flustercuck camp, myself, when it comes to KDE. Everything strikes me as bubbly and gaudy and lacks a cohesive design language. KDE feels like somebody ran one of those disgusting custom-GUI, shun-all-native-controls, wifi configuration or anti-virus applications and thought that kind of intentional inconsistency was a great idea. The above screenshot is the closest I've seen to an improvement in years, and only because there's so much gray everywhere it all just sort of blurs together and you don't register the skin anymore.

But that's cheating.

It's not just you. Where Gnome has taken cues from Mac OS, KDE has taken several cues from Windows. For funzies, while Gnome users acknowledge that it takes cues from Mac OS, KDE users get a sandstorm in their gender-appropriate crevices whenever anyone points at something added to KDE just a few months after the same element was added to a version of Windows.

I'm in the flustercuck camp, myself, when it comes to KDE. Everything strikes me as bubbly and gaudy and lacks a cohesive design language. KDE feels like somebody ran one of those disgusting custom-GUI, shun-all-native-controls, wifi configuration or anti-virus applications and thought that kind of intentional inconsistency was a great idea. The above screenshot is the closest I've seen to an improvement in years, and only because there's so much gray everywhere it all just sort of blurs together and you don't register the skin anymore.

But that's cheating.

Umm.... Wrong. Windows took cues from KDE. Mac took cues from Gnome.

It's not just you. Where Gnome has taken cues from Mac OS, KDE has taken several cues from Windows. For funzies, while Gnome users acknowledge that it takes cues from Mac OS, KDE users get a sandstorm in their gender-appropriate crevices whenever anyone points at something added to KDE just a few months after the same element was added to a version of Windows.

I'm in the flustercuck camp, myself, when it comes to KDE. Everything strikes me as bubbly and gaudy and lacks a cohesive design language. KDE feels like somebody ran one of those disgusting custom-GUI, shun-all-native-controls, wifi configuration or anti-virus applications and thought that kind of intentional inconsistency was a great idea. The above screenshot is the closest I've seen to an improvement in years, and only because there's so much gray everywhere it all just sort of blurs together and you don't register the skin anymore.

But that's cheating.

So you are saying it looks too inconsistent, but the grey skin looks too consistent? :rofl: One thing to note is the default theme is very customization via color schemes. There are many color schemes to choose from by default that are less "grey", and you can download more as well.

I actually just gave 4.8 a try today on my arch install. I had never liked kde in the past, mainly do to buginess and performance issues and I am actually pretty impressed with 4.8. Its extremely fast and responsive on my laptop, even more so than gnome 3 which ran pretty well too. I'm getting 17 seconds boot time to a usable desktop, apps are all opening fast, and kwin effects are super smooth for once. Best of all plasma no longer crashes if I so much as look at it wrong :0

The best thing so far for me is dolphin. Its so much better than nautilus in every single way, and a lot faster. The new layout engine it got in 4.8 has some really nice eye candy and is screaming fast.

I also really like that there is finally an option in system settings to disable nepomuk. I very rarely search for files so have little use for it. If I do search for files I use FSrunner (krunner plugin)

There are still issues with the look in feel, the gui can indeed be weird/convoluted in certain places but its improved.

I'm on KDE 4.8. I already have explained my conversion from Unity to KDE. I'm not hardcore and never have been.

But I had my desktop set to display, well, my desktop folders. I have to remind it now every time I log on to get it to treat my desktop as a place where you can have files.

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? :)

Mac OS X is NeXTStep with a modified UI. NeXT had a beta with a shelf (dock on steroids) in the works around the time they were bought by Apple. This is where the OS X UI draws its inspiration from. Certainly not GNOME 1.x.

OPENSTEP.beta-Desktop.jpg

I think Windows 3.1 looked better than this. KDE looks absolutely awful. I keep thinking they'll come to their senses and revamp the UI, but it doesn't look like it's gonna happen. Are there at least other themes that look more professional?

Gnome was released in 1997. The current Mac interface came about in the early 2000s. Some of Mac's interface was "borrowed" from NeXTStep.

You're still delusional. Things like the Menu Bar go all the way back to the original Mac OS released in 1984. Nothing was "borrowed" from NeXTSTEP, Steve Jobs developed it in 1989 and sold it to Apple in early 1997 following an announcement in late 1996. NeXTSTEP was then turned into Mac OS X.

You really have no point whatsoever. In fact the only thing you proofed here is that GNOME is much younger than both Mac OS and NeXTSTEP are. You should also keep in mind that early GNOME looked nothing like Mac OS/NeXTSTEP. They didn't start copying stuff until recent years.

Maybe I have my facts wrong when it comes to Gnome and Mac. Was never a Mac fan boi, so it isn't important to me. So many OSes "borrow" from each other all the time, it's hard to keep track of who "stole" what and when.

So I will concede the point.

Maybe I have my facts wrong when it comes to Gnome and Mac. Was never a Mac fan boi, so it isn't important to me. So many OSes "borrow" from each other all the time, it's hard to keep track of who "stole" what and when.

So I will concede the point.

I would love to know what Windows copied from KDE..

I loved KDE until 4. The way it changed is too much for me. I switched to LXDE though and haven't looked back. Also, did anyone see the article about Canonical dropping funding from Kubuntu?

Agreed. I went to Gnome and then Xfce. MATE and Cinnamon look good also. Will give those a try soon.

Maybe I have my facts wrong when it comes to Gnome and Mac. Was never a Mac fan boi, so it isn't important to me. So many OSes "borrow" from each other all the time, it's hard to keep track of who "stole" what and when.

So I will concede the point.

So why exactly did you bring it up in the first place?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!