How are your ears doing?


Recommended Posts

35 and can hear 17 pretty decent.

Can hear the clicks on 18, 19. Just the clicks though.

I am not sure how good and reliable this test is, as I know for sure my hearing is not the best.

I grew up playing in metal/punk bands since I was 12 years old, and we never wore earplugs. Only started wearing them in my early 30's in the last band I was in.

The reason I do not think this test is all that real, is because of the aforementioned bands I have played in, combined with a really bad infection, I actually went to an ear doctor in my early 20's.

I had 40% loss in my left ear and 15% loss in my right ear, and again I was in my early 20's. I never went back to an ear doctor as truthfully speaking, I am scared to find out how much worse it has gotten since then.

So yeah, take it with a grain of salt IMHO.

Is this legit? I've done some terrible things to my hears, and I can hear it all the way up to 20khz.

Even odder, I'm not even sure if I can actually hear 19khz, and if I do, it's barely, yet I can hear 20khz clearly.

It really depends on the headphones / speakers, many aren't rated to go above 16-20khz and when pushed above that, they may not reproduce the sound correctly. I have these Sennheiser headphones which can supposedly go up to a ridiculous 38khz.

I have fairly high-grade speakers and a microphone, so I simply recorded my speaker output through the mic. It's no surprise few people can hear above 17khz because the volume levels for the highest frequencies are barely above the noise level for a silent room with only a relatively silent computer in it. In other words it's very inconsistent. Also as pointed out previously, high frequencies at a sample rate of 48khz are far from pure.

For a real test you'd need a real frequency generator (one that doesn't resample) and to normalize the output levels.

Oh and I'm 24 and I can't hear above 15khz. 15khz is already quite faint. I blame 16 years of playing the piano for that. :(

well mine was done professionally becuase I kept hearing things and nobody else could hear (very unpleasant sounds) it everyone thought I lost my mind but I got a hearing test and that's what they said. It's very annoying.

That was done a few years ago it might have changed a bit but I still have it prolly more like 28,000Hz right now, but yeah I cannot stand to be around older electronics and basements of older houses becuase of this.

I avoid going to a couple chain restaurants becuase some of those have that sound emanating from somewhere.

but yeah it's very annoying hearing very high pitched sounds further then others

Most humans cannot hear past 20! At your age that would put your hearing at superhuman levels! Sorry, but I seriously doubt that you can hear those higher frequencies!

I'm 53 and can hear 16 clearly and I am almost sensing something at 17, perhaps I am imagining that I can, not sure!

I'm 32 and I heard all of them. I had problems hearing past 17 at normal volume (Then again I forgot to turn the speakers up) but once I put the ipod ear buds in I heard all of them. This might be because I wear ear protection when I use the lawn mower and snow blower. Back when I was in high school I could tell if the TV was on in the kitchen on mute from the next room just by the high pitch sound the TV made when it was turned on.

I have fairly high-grade speakers and a microphone, so I simply recorded my speaker output through the mic. It's no surprise few people can hear above 17khz because the volume levels for the highest frequencies are barely above the noise level for a silent room with only a relatively silent computer in it...

Thanks for that. I knew something was wrong. I could hear 17KHz very clearly and it was pretty loud, too, even though the speakers were turned down pretty low. Then I went to 18KHz and didn't hear anything until I turned up the volume quite a bit. I'm at a friend's house so I thought it was just these cheap speakers or the integrated audio.

I'm in my lower 30s and got to 18KHz for this test and this poor sound setup.

It really depends on the headphones / speakers, many aren't rated to go above 16-20khz and when pushed above that, they may not reproduce the sound correctly. I have these Sennheiser headphones which can supposedly go up to a ridiculous 38khz.

Well, to be honest, I'm not actually sure of my speakers' rating, but I'm inclined to believe they're better then the standard 20khz. The sounds did get progressively louder, so I dunno..

I'm 29 (will be 30 in 2 months) and I could hear up to 17khz. Weird thing though is that I couldn't really "hear" 18khz+, but when I played them all, my ears started to hurt a little bit. So I may not be able to "hear" it, but I can like "detect" it? Not sure what's going on. All I know is everything past 12khz hurts lol.

24 and I was able to hear up to 20kHz fine, for both 21 and 22 I can hear when the tone starts and stops, but I can't distinguish the tone itself from silence (it seems to make some kind of click when it starts and stops but I don't actually hear the tone itself, just the click....which is likely from my headphones starting and stopping when the sound starts and stops). Although, I am using Razer Carcharias, which have a frequency response up to 20kHz, so its possible my headphones are not even producing the sound (or at least not properly).

Nice to know that my hearing is as good as it is.....when I was younger and my school would do hearing tests (not sure why really, but it got us out of class so I went for it), the test giver always complimented me on my hearing. And I've never been a fan of music in general so I never really listen to any.....good to know that my hearing is as good as it has always been.

Back when I was in high school I could tell if the TV was on in the kitchen on mute from the next room just by the high pitch sound the TV made when it was turned on.

I still do that, nothing bugs me more than someone leaving a tv running with no sound and there's not enough other background noise to block out the high pitch of a tv....of course this doesn't happen often as LED/LCD/Plasma TVs don't do this, but whenever I'm around an older tv that was left on (and muted) I have to turn it off.

39 years old couldn't hear past 14kHz, panicked, popped ears and turned volume right up, heard up to 19kHz...

The click at the beginning spoils it a little as it makes it easier to imagine you are hearing something afterwards.

While true, I personally played each one multiple times, so I could be sure that I wasn't just thinking I was hearing something as each time I did it the tone sounded the exact same in pitch and loudness and was entirely discernible from background noise.....and after 20 I just couldn't hear crap, even with the click at the beginning.

This entire test is kind of meaningless anyways. I'm sure a vast majority of us are getting bad results due to distortions from our speakers, and possibly even sound chips. For example, standard earbuds won't go above 20khz, but many people have claimed to hear above it... most likely, that's just the earbuds trying to reproduce the noise, and failing badly by making a lower pitches noise.

Furthermore, the fact that you are listening to a digital sample of a particular pitch messes it up already. The sound file is most definitely not "pure" for a number of reasons.

They have analogue resonator machines specifically for this kind of test, for when you want to get a legitimate result.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!