Kingdoms of Amalur Reckoning game discussion


Recommended Posts

I was quite impressed with the demo (despite it locking up on me twice, PC version) but I'm really tight with money and Mass Effect 3 is a priority purchase :p Soon as my copy of ME3 is secure, I'll definitely look at grabbing a copy of this game :happy: till then the demo will have to do :)

I first tried this game like every other game I play (with a mouse and keyboard). However, even though I generally despise using a controller, this game seems so much better with one. I only played about an hour or so into it, but it is really good. I am not going to compare it to Skyrim, because these are two completely different beasts while being in the same genre. It has a decent story, great graphics, fun combat, and somewhat of a dumbed down RPG feel, but not too bad that it makes it boring. If you want a very detailed game with a class that can be built in a thousand different ways, with a ton of different weapons/armor, play Skyrim. But if you just want more of a casual action RPG, try Reckoning. I love it.

Skyrim honestly doesn't feel that deep, I mean you just put points in what you like using. Only there you are stuck with your choices. Both RPGs have their merits and both are worth owning.

To me Skyrim is about exploring/'adventuring' more than anything else. You can find endless amounts of things to explore, people to meet (even if the npc interaction is a tad shallow,) and etc. The HD Texture Pack they just released is awesome (you don't notice the difference on literally everything but it is awesome nonetheless.)

So far (I haven't really been much past the demo) I could be more impressed with Amalur. I love the creature designs and gameplay but the storyline makes me roll my eyes a lot so far. It's not terrible, it's just...silly.

So far this month I started Assassins Creed: Brotherhood, a new Skyrim save (lost mine somehow,) KoA, Tales of Vesperia, and at some point I'm relatively sure I'll finish downloading Gotham City Imposters (which I only got cause my friend gave me a 30% off coupon that was only good for a day and I was fairly broke, so don't give me that look :p I love Monolith even if I don't care about multiplayer only titles.)

So I've no idea when I'll go in on Amalur properly.

I didn't have what I'd call a good experience with the PC demo. It really felt like a better-than-average console port. I can see myself enjoying it a little more with a controller though. But to be honest, I wouldn't even pay $30 for it. It's just one of those games that, for whatever reason, you can't enjoy. I had a similar level of dissatisfaction with The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.

PC Skyrim with ~50-60 mods from nexus and a 360 for Windows controller is the most fun I've had in recent memory. I even found a mod that allows for setting 8 favorites using the 360's d-pad and sprint button (LB) + d-pad.

i got my tank guy to lvl 12 all i have to say is OMFG .... he is a beast finally made it to some areas where the mods are a challenge .

but times fighting 4 trolls and 3 of the tree dudes the shoot the black arrows of boom out at you lol

Ya, the game doesn't kick into full force till about lvl 10ish. While in the first area, you just become so powerful it seems, then just boom! everything ramps up and keeps you interested. They did a good job I think.

Ya, the game doesn't kick into full force till about lvl 10ish. While in the first area, you just become so powerful it seems, then just boom! everything ramps up and keeps you interested. They did a good job I think.

have to agree so far im very happy and the HUGE array of weapons and armor is nice all though if like to fined more sets i have found a few but only 1 piece anyone now of a site that show's where to get the rest

I didn't have what I'd call a good experience with the PC demo. It really felt like a better-than-average console port. I can see myself enjoying it a little more with a controller though. But to be honest, I wouldn't even pay $30 for it. It's just one of those games that, for whatever reason, you can't enjoy. I had a similar level of dissatisfaction with The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.

I do have a controller so I tried out the demo yesterday. The graphics look incredibly dated, but they don't have the unnatural quality of Bethesda's artwork. The presentation is overall believable, stylistic and coherent. It looks like there's a lot of story and dialogue, but none of it seems particularly interesting, so it's pretty much Skyrim there. Actually it's basically Skyrim in terms of world and quests, that is, an ever-expanding morass of pointless tedium, but with what seems like fun and engaging character development and combat systems. Worth 15$ and maybe 15 hours max IMO.

I do have a controller so I tried out the demo yesterday. The graphics look incredibly dated, but they don't have the unnatural quality of Bethesda's artwork. The presentation is overall believable, stylistic and coherent. It looks like there's a lot of story and dialogue, but none of it seems particularly interesting, so it's pretty much Skyrim there. Actually it's basically Skyrim in terms of world and quests, that is, an ever-expanding morass of pointless tedium, but with what seems like fun and engaging character development and combat systems. Worth 15$ and maybe 15 hours max IMO.

roflmao

the developers said it to do everything in game would take about 200 hours ..

http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/project-mercury/1217986p1.html

roflmao

the developers said it to do everything in game would take about 200 hours ..

http://pc.gamespy.co.../1217986p1.html

I find that extremely unlikely. I think they are trying to blow wind in their own sails after all the hype with Skyrim and their radiant quests.

If it's true, that's awesome, but like Skyrims radiant quests how much of that 200 hours is just busy work? And judging from the demo the world didn't seem big enough to contain 200+ hours of content. But who knows, maybe it has tons of huge dungeons.

the developers said it to do everything in game would take about 200 hours ..

That doesn't mean it's worth playing 200 hours. I can copy-paste the same 15 min dungeon 800 times and say my game takes 200 hours, doesn't mean it's worth playing more than 15 minutes. I evaluate this game to be worth playing 15 hours, regardless of how long it takes to actually finish it.

That doesn't mean it's worth playing 200 hours. I can copy-paste the same 15 min dungeon 800 times and say my game takes 200 hours, doesn't mean it's worth playing more than 15 minutes. I evaluate this game to be worth playing 15 hours, regardless of how long it takes to actually finish it.

So by that logic, all FPS games are worth 6 minutes of play time... as they would be the same thing over and over... You must really hate gaming.

So by that logic, all FPS games are worth 6 minutes of play time... as they would be the same thing over and over... You must really hate gaming.

There's no need to make assumptions. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I may think a game like Mass Effect 2 is great but that doesn't mean everyone else should agree with me. Also, I haven't played enough of Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to get an idea of the game's length. I did, however, play enough to know that it isn't the game for me on the PC.

There's no need to make assumptions. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I may think a game like Mass Effect 2 is great but that doesn't mean everyone else should agree with me. Also, I haven't played enough of Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to get an idea of the game's length. I did, however, play enough to know that it isn't the game for me on the PC.

Like me for example. :rofl:

I still haven't beat ME2. I started another play through and lost interest with it at pretty much the exact same spot my first play through attempt stalled. I don't know what it is about that game but I just cannot find the interest to continue playing it.

My point is, some game just aren't for some people.

Side note, I played the hell out of ME1 so I don't know why I can't get through ME2.

So by that logic, all FPS games are worth 6 minutes of play time... as they would be the same thing over and over... You must really hate gaming.

FPS and strategy games are skill-based, so the fun comes through getting better at it. You don't really get "better" or "win" at an RPG, you just play your role, see what there is to see and the only thing that gets better is your character. If the role the game gives you isn't exciting, the world or narrative isn't particularly well-written, spectacular or fascinating otherwise, you get bored way before you've seen everything.

FPS and strategy games are skill-based, so the fun comes through getting better at it. You don't really get "better" or "win" at an RPG, you just play your role, see what there is to see and the only thing that gets better is your character. If the role the game gives you isn't exciting, the world or narrative isn't particularly well-written, spectacular or fascinating otherwise, you get bored way before you've seen everything.

Well, that's where KoA is a little different.... there are combos, skills that work off each other. The more you progress, the better some things will work together. You have to know how to link certain moves together, spells together, and what to really attack first. There is just as much strategy to this than there is to god of war. You really shouldn't bash until you have given the game a fair try. Until then, you aren't making a good point. If you haven't put at least 4 hours into this game that has over 200 hours of game to it, it's like saying the harry potter series was horrible from only watching the first 20 minutes of the whole series.. or reading the first 20 pages of the first book.

There's no need to make assumptions. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I may think a game like Mass Effect 2 is great but that doesn't mean everyone else should agree with me. Also, I haven't played enough of Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to get an idea of the game's length. I did, however, play enough to know that it isn't the game for me on the PC.

Not making an assumption. If you are going to say that they are all the same, without even trying it, then your words wont hold much weight. Diablo 3 probably is less skill based than this, but it won't be knocked for it. Games are fun for certain reasons. But if you don't even give them the time, you most likely won't see why.

I evaluate this game to be worth playing 15 hours, regardless of how long it takes to actually finish it.

You evaluate this game to be worth $15, worth playing 15 hours, not finishing it if it takes longer, based on the demo?

Do you do this type of evaluation for other things in your life too? For movies, taking a vacation etc? Just curious.

The more you progress, the better some things will work together. You have to know how to link certain moves together, spells together, and what to really attack first. There is just as much strategy to this than there is to god of war.
The demo failed to present me with any type of tactical challenge, so I base my opinion on that. Even if it did, I'm not a fan of God of War or that type of game in general. They basically consist of reverse-engineering one AI script after the other through trial-and-error, bleh. If you're into this type of thing, I respect that, I just don't personally.

I liked Fable though. Fable wasn't challenging (it had the most overpowered spell I've ever seen), but I liked its light-heartedness and overall charm.

You evaluate this game to be worth $15, worth playing 15 hours, not finishing it if it takes longer, based on the demo?

Do you do this type of evaluation for other things in your life too? For movies, taking a vacation etc? Just curious.

I don't have much of a choice, really, otherwise I'd have to buy everything and try everything first-hand to make decisions, which I can't. I know my opinion is only worth as much as I've seen of the game and my own ability to extrapolate based on a small sample, so just take it for what it is.

I was slightly disappointed by the KoA demo myself honestly (not saying I disliked it, it just didn't keep interest) but having played further into the game than that I actually rather like it. The character interaction is the only thing super noteworthy to me though. Where in Skyrim everyone is just asking you to do something, in KoA people might ask you to do something that isn't exactly noble or other things might pop up (like the gnome you could push to bribe you to keep silent in the demo.)

And you know I've barely started the game, so I'm liking this. The people in it just feel more like people.

Ya, im wondering about the interactions I'm having right now. I haven't said no to any factions, just doing the quest asked of me lol. But some are requiring me to kill people who I am unsure if I will need later... On the other hand, found out that pick pocketing on my mage is pretty interesting... Seems to easily go unnoticed if I steal and then instantly blink away :p

I've reached lvl 16 and the 2nd area of the game, but haven't ventured off into it yet. I am still running around the first area doing all the side quest. But things are still tough. Ran into a cave that threw about 8 big ogres at me, and that was really exciting. Then ran into another cave that I don't think I am up for yet, as the brownies were all diseased, and I would catch it by just looking at them, which would constantly drain my health.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!