Final Fantasy X HD re-release


Recommended Posts

tg2qC.jpg

This past September, Square-Enix made a surprise announcement. Even though fans have been clamoring most for remakes of past Final Fantasy games like VI and (especially) VII, the famous RPG developer and publisher revealed that it would instead by working on a re-release of the PlayStation 2-era RPG Final Fantasy X.

Final Fantasy X HD will be coming to PlayStation 3 and PlayStation Vita, Square-Enix revealed, though details about the game itself have been virtually non-existent.

However, we now have a little more clarity on just what Final Fantasy X HD will be. According to Andriasang, Shinji Hashimoto, a famed Square-Enix producer, confirmed that Final Fantasy X HD is to be considered more of a "remaster" than an outright remake. These comments came from the Taipei Game Show, where inquiring game journalists wanted to know more about the mysterious game-to-be.

As Andriasang points out, "Remaster refers to HD updates like ICO and Shadow of the Colossus rather than full remakes."

Nonetheless, if Shinji Hashimoto is indeed working on Final Fantasy X HD, there's reason to be optimistic. Hashimoto has served as producer on classics like Front Mission, Final Fantasy IX and Kingdom Hearts. He's also served as executive producer on titles such as Tobal, Tobal 2, Einhander, Ehrgeiz, Front Mission 4, Final Fantasy IV Advance, Final Fantasy V Advance, Final Fantasy VI Advance, The World Ends With You and Kingdom Hearts: Birth By Sleep.

http://au.ps3.ign.com/articles/121/1218011p1.html?_cmpid=ign1392

I know everyone wants VII but X isn't bad, is it?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056674-final-fantasy-x-hd-re-release/
Share on other sites

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

That is all..... :argh:

(X was okay, but it was mostly a cinematic game showing off Final Fantasy on the new PS2 hardware. Vi or VII would have been a much better choice, and this irks me that they waste their time on this, when so many people would rather, and have begged for VI or VII.)

You know it's funny, I imagine they want to avoid a FF7 remake because of the high expectations such a product would be met with, but...

Honestly I'd be happy with the same concept: a remastering. We know those 2D backdrops are 3D environments that can be re-rendered at higher resolutions. They can update the character models and to a more appropriate polygon count and the overworld to a higher resolution to smooth the jaggies. They can take after their Enix side and insert existing orchestra arrangements of key parts of the soundtrack (and remaster what's left). The improvement from that alone would be fantastic and wouldn't be too big of a risk.

Sure, I'd love to see a completely rebuilt FF7 with bonus content based on later games, but I'm a reasonable person. :p

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

That is all..... :argh:

(X was okay, but it was mostly a cinematic game showing off Final Fantasy on the new PS2 hardware. Vi or VII would have been a much better choice, and this irks me that they waste their time on this, when so many people would rather, and have begged for VI or VII.)

This is a Square game. This is what they do. They take the shortest route to monetizing old games while most of their resources go to new games in development. That's why we get the same games ported endlessly (Wonderswan FFs, Chrono Trigger ad nauseum, etc). Any complaints are rapidly met with a fanboyish attitude of "YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL THEY'RE RELEASING THEM AT ALL".

Don't get too caught up in it. Square is just that kind of company. Their Enix side gets away with remakes because they're largely all about being 'classic', but the Square side has always targeted kids and teenage girls in Japan who weren't playing games in the mid-90s.

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

That is all..... :argh:

(X was okay, but it was mostly a cinematic game showing off Final Fantasy on the new PS2 hardware. Vi or VII would have been a much better choice, and this irks me that they waste their time on this, when so many people would rather, and have begged for VI or VII.)

Sorry but your wrong, it would be a waste of time redoing an older one because in the time it would take them they could just create a new entry to the series which would sell more. The only reason they have chosen X is that it is already completely 3d and has voice acting etc. so it literally is just a re-release - not a remake. This will just be a hd port in the vein of the recent metal gear releases. A remake of 6 or 7 would be the ultimate fan service but quitre frankly I can't see it happening anytime in the near future.

X wasn't bad, but I'm hammering for graphical upgrades of VI to the PSP (like they did with IV) and, naturally, the VII remake (although a remake would be awesome for IX. Love that one).

Even if I agree that the PS1 games could be more interesting to remaster, you have to realize that FF-X was the first full 3D game, that's why they can probably just re-package the game without modifying anything and make it look excellent on the PS3. I replayed FF-XII on a PS2 emulator on my PC last year and it had about the same effect: smooth 3D, higher res, etc...

So yeah, that's good news. FF news is always good news :)

You know it's funny, I imagine they want to avoid a FF7 remake because of the high expectations such a product would be met with, but...

Honestly I'd be happy with the same concept: a remastering. We know those 2D backdrops are 3D environments that can be re-rendered at higher resolutions. They can update the character models and to a more appropriate polygon count and the overworld to a higher resolution to smooth the jaggies. They can take after their Enix side and insert existing orchestra arrangements of key parts of the soundtrack (and remaster what's left). The improvement from that alone would be fantastic and wouldn't be too big of a risk.

Sure, I'd love to see a completely rebuilt FF7 with bonus content based on later games, but I'm a reasonable person. :p

Check out Project Avalanche and Phoenix for FF7. It is pretty cool. I have it installed on PC, and they retextured a lot of things (characters in world/NPCs/Battle Characters/World Map.) Along with MP3 Quality sounds instead of midi, and changing the ingame menus for items, materia, pictures, etc. It is really odd though everytime you hit an FMV though, as you go back to blocky short characters, instead of full-size retexture models.

I'm just saying, FF7 has sold more than 10 million copies worldwide to date, and is the fastest selling game on PSN. If they put their time and money into a re-make for all platforms, or just console, whichever. I guarantee they would see a pretty substantial return, and something very worthwhile. And would make Square fans that have recently been bored with their recent releases, pretty happy.

remake 6 , 7 , or 8... but not 10.. sheesh.

Ugh, no thank you to 8. Good story, broken leveling system / junction system .. and tedious to sit in battle and "draw" all day long.

Ugh, no thank you to 8. Good story, broken leveling system / junction system .. and tedious to sit in battle and "draw" all day long.

Hense remake. That way they can improve upon what was shoddy in those, but still keep what was great. 8 had the best story I believe still to this day.

People need to get over their absurd obsession with FF7. Really. FF7 is alot like half life, it's not bad, but it's not the holy grail of its genre that people endlessly harp on and on that it is without shutting up.

As for the FFX hd update, if it's just an upscaling to hd(which is how it sounds), you could already do that with your pc.

Personally I'd prefer to play a FF8 remaster more than any of the others, especially on the Vita.

Ever since I read SquallsDead.com, that game has moved from a favorite guilty pleasure title to a high ranking masterpiece, in my eyes. It's possibly my favorite game of all time.

FF7 should be a remake launch title for the PS4... SALES SALES SALES SALES SALES... Seriously though, I couldn't see any future, exclusive, PS4 launch title outselling a full FF7 remake. It would outsell Uncharted, Resistance, and Killzone combined. Sony should just offer up half the dev cost right now (if they haven't already.)

I'm looking forward to it. XIII and XIII-2 are pretty linear games compared to the older games. It'll be nice to play something rather than watching 30 hours of cutscenes.

At least they are learning from their mistakes in 13. 13-2 is leagues better I believe... but I'm still ****ed I have to buy DLC for a ending. 1 step forward, 20 steps back into my damn wallet :p

At least they are learning from their mistakes in 13. 13-2 is leagues better I believe... but I'm still ****ed I have to buy DLC for a ending. 1 step forward, 20 steps back into my damn wallet :p

Partially, I don't like Vanille as a character, as her voice seriously annoys me. Does XIII-2 allow a little more freedom? Because XIII forced me to walk through levels and watch cutscenes repeatedly. Also, DLC for XIII-2 came out today didn't it?

You wont regret it and the reason why people want FF7 is because of the most famous popular char CLOUD.

Well i personally prefer the old school FF games (pre-PSX) but I've been trying to finish up some of the newer games but I find it hard lol. I played and finished FF7 when it came out, not sure if I'd want to do it again. FF8 I didn't manage to finish it, I think I made it to the last disc but the story got boring. FF9 was a great game and I finished it. FF10 didn't have a chance...I picked up Suikoden 3 almost right after so I didn't play much. FF11 I'll never play it, I don't like online games. FF12 looks good but not sure about the more action based battle system. I tried FF13 and I got REALLY bored with the straight line maps and crappy battle system (what do you mean I only control one person?)

Partially, I don't like Vanille as a character, as her voice seriously annoys me. Does XIII-2 allow a little more freedom? Because XIII forced me to walk through levels and watch cutscenes repeatedly. Also, DLC for XIII-2 came out today didn't it?

Not sure if the DLC was released. But xiii-2 has a lot more freedom. There are cutscenes, but they aren't as long. There is a ton of replay value though it seems, as there are multiple paths you can take, and you can do the same levels in different "times" for different stories and events.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!