Final Fantasy X HD re-release


Recommended Posts

tg2qC.jpg

This past September, Square-Enix made a surprise announcement. Even though fans have been clamoring most for remakes of past Final Fantasy games like VI and (especially) VII, the famous RPG developer and publisher revealed that it would instead by working on a re-release of the PlayStation 2-era RPG Final Fantasy X.

Final Fantasy X HD will be coming to PlayStation 3 and PlayStation Vita, Square-Enix revealed, though details about the game itself have been virtually non-existent.

However, we now have a little more clarity on just what Final Fantasy X HD will be. According to Andriasang, Shinji Hashimoto, a famed Square-Enix producer, confirmed that Final Fantasy X HD is to be considered more of a "remaster" than an outright remake. These comments came from the Taipei Game Show, where inquiring game journalists wanted to know more about the mysterious game-to-be.

As Andriasang points out, "Remaster refers to HD updates like ICO and Shadow of the Colossus rather than full remakes."

Nonetheless, if Shinji Hashimoto is indeed working on Final Fantasy X HD, there's reason to be optimistic. Hashimoto has served as producer on classics like Front Mission, Final Fantasy IX and Kingdom Hearts. He's also served as executive producer on titles such as Tobal, Tobal 2, Einhander, Ehrgeiz, Front Mission 4, Final Fantasy IV Advance, Final Fantasy V Advance, Final Fantasy VI Advance, The World Ends With You and Kingdom Hearts: Birth By Sleep.

http://au.ps3.ign.com/articles/121/1218011p1.html?_cmpid=ign1392

I know everyone wants VII but X isn't bad, is it?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056674-final-fantasy-x-hd-re-release/
Share on other sites

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

That is all..... :argh:

(X was okay, but it was mostly a cinematic game showing off Final Fantasy on the new PS2 hardware. Vi or VII would have been a much better choice, and this irks me that they waste their time on this, when so many people would rather, and have begged for VI or VII.)

You know it's funny, I imagine they want to avoid a FF7 remake because of the high expectations such a product would be met with, but...

Honestly I'd be happy with the same concept: a remastering. We know those 2D backdrops are 3D environments that can be re-rendered at higher resolutions. They can update the character models and to a more appropriate polygon count and the overworld to a higher resolution to smooth the jaggies. They can take after their Enix side and insert existing orchestra arrangements of key parts of the soundtrack (and remaster what's left). The improvement from that alone would be fantastic and wouldn't be too big of a risk.

Sure, I'd love to see a completely rebuilt FF7 with bonus content based on later games, but I'm a reasonable person. :p

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

That is all..... :argh:

(X was okay, but it was mostly a cinematic game showing off Final Fantasy on the new PS2 hardware. Vi or VII would have been a much better choice, and this irks me that they waste their time on this, when so many people would rather, and have begged for VI or VII.)

This is a Square game. This is what they do. They take the shortest route to monetizing old games while most of their resources go to new games in development. That's why we get the same games ported endlessly (Wonderswan FFs, Chrono Trigger ad nauseum, etc). Any complaints are rapidly met with a fanboyish attitude of "YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL THEY'RE RELEASING THEM AT ALL".

Don't get too caught up in it. Square is just that kind of company. Their Enix side gets away with remakes because they're largely all about being 'classic', but the Square side has always targeted kids and teenage girls in Japan who weren't playing games in the mid-90s.

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

That is all..... :argh:

(X was okay, but it was mostly a cinematic game showing off Final Fantasy on the new PS2 hardware. Vi or VII would have been a much better choice, and this irks me that they waste their time on this, when so many people would rather, and have begged for VI or VII.)

Sorry but your wrong, it would be a waste of time redoing an older one because in the time it would take them they could just create a new entry to the series which would sell more. The only reason they have chosen X is that it is already completely 3d and has voice acting etc. so it literally is just a re-release - not a remake. This will just be a hd port in the vein of the recent metal gear releases. A remake of 6 or 7 would be the ultimate fan service but quitre frankly I can't see it happening anytime in the near future.

X wasn't bad, but I'm hammering for graphical upgrades of VI to the PSP (like they did with IV) and, naturally, the VII remake (although a remake would be awesome for IX. Love that one).

Even if I agree that the PS1 games could be more interesting to remaster, you have to realize that FF-X was the first full 3D game, that's why they can probably just re-package the game without modifying anything and make it look excellent on the PS3. I replayed FF-XII on a PS2 emulator on my PC last year and it had about the same effect: smooth 3D, higher res, etc...

So yeah, that's good news. FF news is always good news :)

You know it's funny, I imagine they want to avoid a FF7 remake because of the high expectations such a product would be met with, but...

Honestly I'd be happy with the same concept: a remastering. We know those 2D backdrops are 3D environments that can be re-rendered at higher resolutions. They can update the character models and to a more appropriate polygon count and the overworld to a higher resolution to smooth the jaggies. They can take after their Enix side and insert existing orchestra arrangements of key parts of the soundtrack (and remaster what's left). The improvement from that alone would be fantastic and wouldn't be too big of a risk.

Sure, I'd love to see a completely rebuilt FF7 with bonus content based on later games, but I'm a reasonable person. :p

Check out Project Avalanche and Phoenix for FF7. It is pretty cool. I have it installed on PC, and they retextured a lot of things (characters in world/NPCs/Battle Characters/World Map.) Along with MP3 Quality sounds instead of midi, and changing the ingame menus for items, materia, pictures, etc. It is really odd though everytime you hit an FMV though, as you go back to blocky short characters, instead of full-size retexture models.

I'm just saying, FF7 has sold more than 10 million copies worldwide to date, and is the fastest selling game on PSN. If they put their time and money into a re-make for all platforms, or just console, whichever. I guarantee they would see a pretty substantial return, and something very worthwhile. And would make Square fans that have recently been bored with their recent releases, pretty happy.

remake 6 , 7 , or 8... but not 10.. sheesh.

Ugh, no thank you to 8. Good story, broken leveling system / junction system .. and tedious to sit in battle and "draw" all day long.

Ugh, no thank you to 8. Good story, broken leveling system / junction system .. and tedious to sit in battle and "draw" all day long.

Hense remake. That way they can improve upon what was shoddy in those, but still keep what was great. 8 had the best story I believe still to this day.

People need to get over their absurd obsession with FF7. Really. FF7 is alot like half life, it's not bad, but it's not the holy grail of its genre that people endlessly harp on and on that it is without shutting up.

As for the FFX hd update, if it's just an upscaling to hd(which is how it sounds), you could already do that with your pc.

Personally I'd prefer to play a FF8 remaster more than any of the others, especially on the Vita.

Ever since I read SquallsDead.com, that game has moved from a favorite guilty pleasure title to a high ranking masterpiece, in my eyes. It's possibly my favorite game of all time.

FF7 should be a remake launch title for the PS4... SALES SALES SALES SALES SALES... Seriously though, I couldn't see any future, exclusive, PS4 launch title outselling a full FF7 remake. It would outsell Uncharted, Resistance, and Killzone combined. Sony should just offer up half the dev cost right now (if they haven't already.)

I'm looking forward to it. XIII and XIII-2 are pretty linear games compared to the older games. It'll be nice to play something rather than watching 30 hours of cutscenes.

At least they are learning from their mistakes in 13. 13-2 is leagues better I believe... but I'm still ****ed I have to buy DLC for a ending. 1 step forward, 20 steps back into my damn wallet :p

At least they are learning from their mistakes in 13. 13-2 is leagues better I believe... but I'm still ****ed I have to buy DLC for a ending. 1 step forward, 20 steps back into my damn wallet :p

Partially, I don't like Vanille as a character, as her voice seriously annoys me. Does XIII-2 allow a little more freedom? Because XIII forced me to walk through levels and watch cutscenes repeatedly. Also, DLC for XIII-2 came out today didn't it?

You wont regret it and the reason why people want FF7 is because of the most famous popular char CLOUD.

Well i personally prefer the old school FF games (pre-PSX) but I've been trying to finish up some of the newer games but I find it hard lol. I played and finished FF7 when it came out, not sure if I'd want to do it again. FF8 I didn't manage to finish it, I think I made it to the last disc but the story got boring. FF9 was a great game and I finished it. FF10 didn't have a chance...I picked up Suikoden 3 almost right after so I didn't play much. FF11 I'll never play it, I don't like online games. FF12 looks good but not sure about the more action based battle system. I tried FF13 and I got REALLY bored with the straight line maps and crappy battle system (what do you mean I only control one person?)

Partially, I don't like Vanille as a character, as her voice seriously annoys me. Does XIII-2 allow a little more freedom? Because XIII forced me to walk through levels and watch cutscenes repeatedly. Also, DLC for XIII-2 came out today didn't it?

Not sure if the DLC was released. But xiii-2 has a lot more freedom. There are cutscenes, but they aren't as long. There is a ton of replay value though it seems, as there are multiple paths you can take, and you can do the same levels in different "times" for different stories and events.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!