• 0

[C#] Recommended Activation Technology


Question

Hi everyone. I was wondering if anyone could suggest a product (Hopefully reasonably priced) that I would be able to use to provide activations of a .Net project I am working on. I would prefer something that I would be able to use on more than one project, but as sales are likely to be relatively small, cost is a concern. So I was curious if anyone had any good suggestions for me.

Thanks Again,

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056880-c-recommended-activation-technology/
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thank you very much for your response. Unfortunately due to the information I'm storing in the application I don't think I would be able to move this to a web based solution... I've been looking at a few options, but I honestly don't know what would be a good solution for this. I'm really hoping that we get a few recommendations of solutions others have used and such. :)

I did find this and it sounds decent, but I'm not sure what others would think about this solution:

http://www.eziriz.com/intellilock.htm

  • 0

I coded my own, that generates a key server side, and is returned to the client, if the client and server both match it's good to go. I know there are potential risks (code being exposed), but depending how you do it, can be pretty secure. Especially if the server sends a message to flip a random bit based on some random code.

  • 0

Thanks for the response. I appreciate the suggestion. I'm not sure that I would want to make my own though, considering the potential if I made a mistake. I want to make sure that it isn't too restrictive, but on the same token isn't going to have a flaw or something that would allow anyone to use my application. :(

  • 0

Thanks for the response. I appreciate the suggestion. I'm not sure that I would want to make my own though, considering the potential if I made a mistake. I want to make sure that it isn't too restrictive, but on the same token isn't going to have a flaw or something that would allow anyone to use my application. :(

The way mine works, is the client generates a key (based on a formula), the client sends it to the server where the server stores it. If it is a valid key the server sends back another code that contains an encryption key and an encrypted key. The client then runs a formula, uses the encryption key and compares it's internal result with the one the server sent. If it works I save some files that the user doesn't know about. Granted there are potential security flaws, I never let the customer see their product key, when they do it is fully encrypted, and I have redundant copies of their key all over the place. I use 2 token files, and embed their key into the licensing program. All the data is encrypted as it travels. Basically I hide as much as possible from the client. Even the offline activation uses their unique key with a formula based on bits within the program that I turn on and off and it is then read to our support staff which can decode the key, and generate an auth-code which in turn has a key built into it, that when compared inside the client if it matches it is good.

It's pretty simple, the biggest thing is making it very dynamic in that it's not just a simple formula, make it change based on different factors, and spread the code out as much as possible instead of keeping it to one area in code. Also hide whatever security measures you use from the client.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, While ~104 GB of space may seem generous (at least compared to other e-readers which have 8-32GB), I feel at this price point the device should have a Micro SDXC card slot for expansion, particularly if it allows audio books to be installed and played. I hope to see more reviews of 6" phone-sized e-readers on Neowin in the future. It will be interesting to see how they compare. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 by Razvan Serea Run programs in a sandbox to prevent malware from making permanent changes to your PC. Sandboxie allows you to run your browser, or any other program, so that all changes that result from the usage are kept in a sandbox environment, which can then be deleted later. Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. It is being developed by David Xanatos since it became open source, before that it was developed by Sophos (which acquired it from Invincea, which acquired it earlier from the original author Ronen Tzur). It creates a sandbox-like isolated operating environment in which applications can be run or installed without permanently modifying the local or mapped drive. An isolated virtual environment allows controlled testing of untrusted programs and web surfing. Sandboxie is available in two flavors Plus and Classic. Both have the same core components, this means they have the same level of security and compatibility. What's different is the user interface the Plus build has a modern Qt based UI which supports all new features that have been added since the project went open source. The Classic build has the old no longer developed MFC based UI, hence it lacks support for modern features, these features can however still be used when manually configured in the Sandboxie.ini. Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 release notes: Added added DisableCustomTitleOpt=[process,][y|n] to allow [#] sandboxie title markers on custom-titlebar windows (Delphi VCL, Qt, Electron) that were previously skipped to prevent DWM repaint CPU loops #5387 Changed updated bundled ImDisk driver to 3.0.2 #5419 Fixed fix Suppress logs for expected non-user SIDs #5422 SbieSvc.exe: SBIE2218/2219 error when run program as administrator #5417 fixed explorer.exe crashes in Application Compartment when Huorong Security is installed #5423 Download: Sandboxie Plus (64-bit) | 23.5 MB (Open Source) Download: Sandboxie Classic (64-bit) | 3.0 MB Links: Sandboxie Website | GitHub | ARM64 | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!