Why so many bad Windows Phone 7 tile design


Recommended Posts

I own a Windows Phone 7 HTC HD7 but I can't stand all the really bad tile design that the developer use when releasing an app. It makes me feel like my phone is really cheap. Apple has the best looking app and then WebOS and then Android. It's just mind blowing how icon is so hard for people on the Windows side to do. They need someone to review the icon because releasing the app. Steve Job was very picky with their app but you can see how good they are. Windows Phone 7 need a designer review before they can release the app. No Joke!

http://expression.microsoft.com/en-us/gg317447

From what I can gather, a lot of developers look at Metro, and think "oh it's just some text and squares, that looks pretty simple", and then underestimate the importance of well thought-out design in Metro. Hence, they practically ignore any proper design focus in their apps because they think there's nothing to design - the text's all there. Just keep stacking text on top of each other in random places! Metro's apparently simplicity is very deceptive, and most developers (of which - most are just one or two people coding in their spare time) don't understand this. Making text look good on it's own requires quite a bit of smart effort.

Anyway, what this leads on too is a general lack of design focus for many, and also given the inherent lack of reliance of icons for most WP apps too (and those that do tend to use the sample icons), designing an actual icon can be an afterthought in a lot of cases. Just chuck together some weird looking white object and be done with it seems to be the consensus for a lot on the marketplace.

Buuuut, most of the apps that actually count or are worthwhile tend to have actually *been designed*, and also tend to have decent icons as a result.

Or maybe I'm just crazy... =P

  • Like 2

Any apps in particular? Most of my pinned tiles look pretty good.

If you do a search for something and most will see very bad tile design. All the feature apps looks great but when you go deep in to it then the bad stuff will pop up really quick. If the tile design is bad then the app will look bad too.

Thank u for making a thread about this.

I have had it!...

ugly app logos. And ugly splash screens. Many apps dont have splash screens at all. Some apps have patheticly dont icons and stuff. But im forced to use them because they are good apps function wise.

I am saying this here. If u develop for WP7. U need work with icons or tile. Email me. Ill charge almost nothing just so the tiles can look little better. Ill do my best. I was going to make a topic about it in a day or so. I can do alot better than makeshift icons.

  • Like 2

some apps i use alot but wish had better UI.

Flashlight 7 : (the tile is really a photo. I think a metro flashlight would look very sweet.

Accurate tuner : the app tile can be metrofied and look amazing.

Cam Broadcaster : i dont use it :p but it was free for a day so downloaded it (it needs work).

Cool Remote : Brilliant app. I use my whole desktop to check torrent download from a floor above with this awesome app but the icon. Damn. I cant pin it to start screen just because of the bad icon.

gMaps : very poorly done Tile (flashy effects gradients on the map)

PC Remote : recently updated. Added tiles for softwares to control but the software icons itself are so off. Its yukhy. This app needs alot of work but is a great app function wise. I use it to control media player controls while watching a movie if im in bed.

TVersity remote : Again same problem as with other remote apps. The icons are like a half hour job or maybe from google images.

If you do a search for something and most will see very bad tile design. All the feature apps looks great but when you go deep in to it then the bad stuff will pop up really quick. If the tile design is bad then the app will look bad too.

Most of this is junk Android ports.

I guess it's something very personal. I have an iPhone 4S, I like it a lot, and I have many many paid apps. But in my personal opinion, WP7.5 has the most beautiful, slick, sexy and modern design.

iOS is well designed and easy to use, but it sometimes feels dated visually ;) And some icons are literally AWFUL (Mint.com, Mail app, Youtube app, iBooks, iSub, etc.)

I totally agree, none of the apps I downloaded ever used the metro design very well. I believe it's just because the platform is new. Devs just want to put something out there for now and focus on particulars later.

Devs need to realize how much information they can give the user from just the tile.

Example: Weather, that I never really want to run the app, I just want to look at my phone and know the weather...

alarm clocks. I don't want to have to run this app. Just list 2-3 alarms (let me pick which) and show them on the tile.

Maps, is it really that difficult to have the tile show a live map?

I can give examples all day. Ended up selling my windows phone this week cause the developers just weren't delivering what microsoft envisioned.

I guess it's something very personal. I have an iPhone 4S, I like it a lot, and I have many many paid apps. But in my personal opinion, WP7.5 has the most beautiful, slick, sexy and modern design.

iOS is well designed and easy to use, but it sometimes feels dated visually ;) And some icons are literally AWFUL.

its not only the icons.

It starts there. As the icon is pretty much the easiest to make. (considering time). Where as the actual UI buttons or icons or background or splashscreen takes long. So if an app has a bad icon expect it to have a bad UI all over.

Theres this app called AppDeals (its designed in a way that is something between flat Metro and the WEB 2.0 UI. but its done with attention to details and it looks really good.

Also i love how IMDB looks. or even Allrecipes looks really nice aswell.

Okay I'll bite. I'm a single developer, I have an app. It's a Magic: The Gathering app. I used to have an ugly looking wizard, but he was "flat". I changed it to the guy who's in my siggy, and in the app list I have a blue icon with a white wizard hat.

How could I make my app icons look better?

note: I'm against making a transparent tile with a white hat icon. That just seems too... boring!

edit: I know it's not great, but what direction should I be going in?

Yes there are apps with bad icons, but mot iOS apps alo have terrible icos and UI designs. The ratio of goods actually better on WP hn iOS or android. IOS jus happen to have far more apps for now an thus also more well designed ones.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!