Recommended Posts

Chrome only future for Flash on Linux

Adobe has announced that in future, the Flash Player for Linux will only be available through Google as part of the Google Chrome browser and not as a standalone download. The shipped plugin will also only support Chrome's plugin API. The changes will take effect after the release of Flash Player 11.2 later this year.

In a blog posting, Adobe said it had been working with Google on developing a replacement for the Netscape plug-in API that Flash Player currently uses, called PPAPI or Pepper. Pepper is designed to be a single modern API for plugins within the browser with an effective abstraction layer hiding the different types of browser and API.

Adobe has worked with Google on this as Flash Player is one of the more complex plug-ins available and the partnership is leading to Google providing a "Pepper" API-based Flash Player with Google Chrome on all x86 32- and 64-bit platforms, including Linux, later this year. Google already embeds its own Flash Player in the Chrome browser and works closely with Adobe to ensure it receives security updates for Chrome's Flash at the same time.

Adobe has therefore also announced that after the release of Flash Player 11.2, the Flash Player browser plug-in for Linux will only be available with the "Pepper" API and only as part of the Google Chrome distribution. It will discontinue the availability of direct downloads of the Flash Player for Linux, but says it will continue to provide security updates for the non-Pepper versions of Flash Player 11.2 for Linux for five years after its release. The move only affects Linux platforms; Adobe will continue to support non-"Pepper" plugin APIs on all other platforms.

It would appear that this change would freeze Mozilla Firefox's Flash support on Linux at Flash Player 11.2. Mozilla has previously said it is "not interested in or working on Pepper at this time".

Source: The H Open Source

Link: Adobe Blog posting

I like that Adobe is basically killing flash on their own so the rest of the world doesn't need to.

First they drop it on mobile now they are dropping linux. Looks like they are not focusing on growing Flash adoption but instead just focusing on Windows and OS X. I wouldn't be surprised if their next announcement in 6 months from now would be the dropping of Flash support on OS X to only the Chrome browser and then eventually putting the Windows version on EOL notice with mere security updates.

Adobes shift away from Flash is great in my opinion. I'm sure when some developers like Boz see this they will say Linux doesn't matter anyway or that Chromes growing market share makes this loss no big deal.

In all honesty

Looks like they are not focusing on growing Flash adoption but instead just focusing on Windows and OS X.

In all honestly the Linux desktop market share isn't really going anywhere so Adobe probably doesn't loose much by dropping it.

In all honesty

In all honestly the Linux desktop market share isn't really going anywhere so Adobe probably doesn't loose much by dropping it.

Did you read my whole post though? If this was a company that wanted Flash to be a word in everyone's vocabulary they would continue to support Linux. A platform that has more users now than it has ever had period. If it made sense for them to support it years ago that decision should be even more valid today.

And when this decision is weighed with the decision they made last year to completely pull Flash from the mobile space, dropping android support (Which is Linux and has 100's of millions of users) it kind of shows a pattern that they are giving up on Flash.

All of what I'm talking about is Flash in the browser. I'm not talking about their Adobe Air or what-not.

I was thinking the other day if they are killing it before it is killed? Won't HTML5 kill it anyway?

It is going to have to be supported as default by all the browsers.

I just can't see where else they could possibly be going with this. No mobile version? When that is the fastest growing platform in the market. Seems like madness to me.

says it will continue to provide security updates for the non-Pepper versions of Flash Player 11.2 for Linux for five years after its release. The move only affects Linux platforms; Adobe will continue to support non-"Pepper" plugin APIs on all other platforms.

Well that's just non-sensical... They're adopting a particular API for a particular browser in an open-source environment?

/me waits for NonAdobeFlashLite

Did you read my whole post though? If this was a company that wanted Flash to be a word in everyone's vocabulary they would continue to support Linux. A platform that has more users now than it has ever had period. If it made sense for them to support it years ago that decision should be even more valid today.

Adobe is still a commercial company and if it turns out that the resources put into keeping Flash on Linux alive isn't worth its while it will get axed. That's what I think happened here.

Well I hope they start ****ing including it with 64 bit chrome then... Currently ONLY the 32 bit version of chrome on linux includes flash.

I can run Safari in 64-bit while using 32-bit plugins. Why won't other browsers go the same route?

There's already talk of the API being added to Firefox so this shouldn't be an issue. Plus HTML5 is improving (so I hear).

Good to know I can play all my favorite games on Miniclip without Flash.

Oh wait :p

Glassed Silver:mac

I like that Adobe is basically killing flash on their own so the rest of the world doesn't need to.

Saves us the trouble anyway.

But I'm genuinely surprised at this news though, and it looks like Flash on Linux is now completely dependent on Google's viewpoint on the matter.

Don't care. I figure by the time they drop it everything I use via Flash (I had to think really hard about this and nothing but video sites pops up) will either be HTML5 or will continue to work with current Flash anyway (I doubt anyone in a couple of years will use it as a development platform of choice).

Ouch, without Chrome, Desktop Linux won't have a media supporting browser.

Then again, Linux is not a media OS. Boot into Windows if you want to enjoy movies.

Linux is not a media OS

is not a media OS

not a media OS

not media OS

:|

Glassed Silver:mac

You're doing something wrong if you're watching your movies through Flash.

Well if "doing something wrong" involves achieving flawless HD video playback on a single core CPU using Adobe Flash, then yes.

Also if "doing something wrong" involves using Windows, then also yes.

Adobe Flash has evolved immensely since 10.0, essentially any problems with Adobe Flash can trace back to You doing it wrong. :)

Linux is not a media OS

is not a media OS

not a media OS

not media OS

:|

Glassed Silver:mac

Prove me wrong.

The only exception is Smart phones, but then they support h.264 and MP3s so there is no problem dropping Flash Support.

There's already talk of the API being added to Firefox so this shouldn't be an issue. Plus HTML5 is improving (so I hear).

If the API is added to Firefox, it won't be by Mozilla's doing. Mozilla and Apple (apparently) are going another route (Why create a new cross platform API, when the browser already includes that stuff)

Even then, it's not that much of a loss. Flash is pretty crappy on Linux (and OS X as well).

Well if "doing something wrong" involves achieving flawless HD video playback on a single core CPU using Adobe Flash, then yes.

Also if "doing something wrong" involves using Windows, then also yes.

Adobe Flash has evolved immensely since 10.0, essentially any problems with Adobe Flash can trace back to You doing it wrong. :)

Prove me wrong.

The only exception is Smart phones, but then they support h.264 and MP3s so there is no problem dropping Flash Support.

Are you talking about web browsers or actual Operating systems because i think you are getting confused. Linux is a very good Media system os if you look for the right distro. And what do you mean by smart phones support h.264 and mp3. These formats have practically nothing to do with flash.

Quit bitching, you know very well he's referring to video websites such as YouTube. Flash is still the best and most universal way of delivering video content through a browser.

You don't need flash to watch Youtube videos. Actually you don't even need a browser to watch Youtube videos.

I use Minitube, and Musictube if I feel like creating playlists grooveshark-style. You just search for some band and it groups all the songs by album, with cover art, lyrics and everything, and let's you choose between studio and live recordings. Quite cool.

pantallazodel2012022401.png

None of those programs use flash, they go straight for the video stream.

The only exception is Smart phones, but then they support h.264 and MP3s so there is no problem dropping Flash Support.

I'm not sure what you mean to say there, Linux also supports h.264 and mp3 :huh:

I'm not sure what you mean to say there, Linux also supports h.264 and mp3 :huh:

We are talking about browsers here. If not using Chrome and Flash, how will you be able to enjoy embedded music and movies on the web?

Well if "doing something wrong" involves achieving flawless HD video playback on a single core CPU using Adobe Flash, then yes.

Also if "doing something wrong" involves using Windows, then also yes.

Way to miss the point. (Y)

Adobe Flash has evolved immensely since 10.0, essentially any problems with Adobe Flash can trace back to You doing it wrong. :)

What you're saying right there makes no sense whatsoever. There's nothing someone can do wrong.

  • Like 1

We are talking about browsers here. If not using Chrome and Flash, how will you be able to enjoy embedded music and movies on the web?

No, we were talking about how Linux is not supposed to be a media OS according to you.

And instead of me proving you wrong, how about you go ahead and prove me you're right, cause it's you making crazy statements.

Does Linux run ANY media application out there? No.

Is that a requirement to be a good media OS? No.

Glassed Silver:mac

PS: But to answer your question, old Flash versions don't die magically, they still work and as people tend to go HTML5 the significance of Flash "latest main version/minus one" being installed on your system lowers drastically.

PPS: @.Neo: Well said. Flash is still a bloody mess and definitely far from being a sound platform!

No, we were talking about how Linux is not supposed to be a media OS according to you.

And instead of me proving you wrong, how about you go ahead and prove me you're right, cause it's you making crazy statements.

Does Linux run ANY media application out there? No.

Is that a requirement to be a good media OS? No.

I think you are missing my point completely.

Adobe Flash is a media plug-in that plays a variety of media formats and games - without Adobe Flash, you are left with a less functional browser.

This is not much of an issue for a couple of reasons (1) almost no one uses Linux (2) even less people use Linux for entertainment.

Exception to this is mobile Linux OS which are built with media in mind (more optimized for media and can take full advantage of the hardware's media capabilities), but then again they are not relevant to this topic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • They thought value of their goods would forever only drop like it used to and didn't account for sudden increase in price because of all the Ai hype. Tough luck Samsung, don't try to weasel this one out. Also American customer protection laws are a**. In Europe, you need to be compensated for a functioning product of same or better characteristics (not same price point as when it was originally bought!) if it can't be repaired and when you receive a replacement product your warranty starts from scratch because you received a different item than you previously had and old warranty thus cannot apply to it anymore. If your actual item was successfully repaired, warranty gets extended for the period the item was in service. If item is repaired to a significant extent, warranty also starts over from scratch because major part of it was replaced. Americans need to fight to get this kind of consumer protections because they are constantly getting screwed over.
    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      184
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!