Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

Can you recommend a decent tablet that can run Windows 7 & Windows 8, with 10" touchscreen, bluetooth & internal GPS, wifi (and 3g if possible) that could be used in my lounge & in my car instead of my WP7 phone for Satnav.

I have an 8 month old Samsung NP-RC520 laptop (i5 processor, 6GB RAM, bluetooth, hdmi out etc) & and an HP Touchpad 32GB (with touchstone dock & HP case) running Android CM9 alpha 2 that I could put up for sale to cover some of the cost (not decided which price to sell them for yet - maybe ?450 - ?500 for them both as a package).

My budget is whatever I can sell my laptop & Touchpad for, plus ?100 ish.

If I buy from a retailer or e-retailer I'd consider refurbished.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks!

I would hold on a few months, Windows 8 tablets are not quite here yet and I say it will be well worth the wait rather than getting one that is running 7

Saying that, I know the "ICONIA TAB W500" can run 7 and I imagine it will run 8 as well if not better

for now ... most x86 tablets are nt any good the only 1 with anything near the performance of ur laptop is the Asus Slate !! ...

any others are only single core Atom's with 1 or 2gb ram ... and most have a VERY low res Screen ...

windows 8 and metro screen MS aim at 1360x768 and up screen res, mostly all current x86 tabs use very low res of 1280 X 720 and below

SIDE NOTE - HP TouchPad can be modded to run Android btw !! ... can even dualboot WebOS and Android ;) google XDA Dev Forums, - EDIT SORRY just re read ur post u got android already ;p

Windows 7 and touch screen - EPIC Fail ... buttons et6c are way too small !

PS if your trying to basicly make a InCar PC idea out of a tablet or say a mini itx pc ;) ... http://www.centrafus...rafuseAuto.aspx

also Google Maps can also be used as SatNav - my parents do this with my dads Samsung Galaxy Tab.

from what i read on some places even say Linux - Ubuntu as a touch pad isnt realy that good either

the only Tablet out on the market that supports the specs for WIndows 8 Tablet screen res is http://www.zoostorm.com/Products/93-zoostorm-sl8-3310-9500-tablet-pc.aspx

but as you can see .... crappy hardware !!

as said the Windows 8 Tablets being launched ..

HOWEVER at first they wont be x86 Option btw those should be ARM tablets and will run WOA (Windows On Arm) which is Windows 8 but made for ARM Processors and as such wont run all or any normal desktop software .. as so far none of the standard Windows Application out support ARM ... only Micorosoft have Office 15 working on there.. they will also be locked down very heavly ..even more so then iOS . so you wont be able to do that much from launch unless some realy good genius cracks the security

Thanks for our replies so far, very interesting reading.

I'd just like to add that the only tasks I'll use the tablet for are web browsing, storing music on (for in car use via bluetooth to stereo head unit) watching movies & HD catchup tv (iplayer etc), Sat-Nav (in car), emailing & the possibly odd word document.

Sat-nav is important as is the screen quality.

I already use Windows 8 on my laptop, but I'm concerned about the resale value of my laptop / touchpad dropping over time hence why I'm looking @ selling sooner rather than later.

Shame a decent spec Win7 tablet is not available now for ?300 odd with spec I need lol!!

Any more input from others in addition to those kind enough to have posted already would be appreciated :-)

I thought TouchPad was pretty good one for browsing and stuff you listed.

You can always estimate the value of your current laptop, and buy a rather cheaper one, a Netbook, if you may, to get you through the year.

Reason to got through this , if you buy some Windows 7 tablet now, you might get around with it, and feel good that you got one and all, but later this year, its re-sale value will fade away. Almost entirely.

And running Windows 8 on it may not be as good as running it on the newer ones.

Also, almost all of the current 7 tablets have average displays, so that gives you another reason to wait.

Waiting sucks, but in this case, I assure you, it will pay-off

I thought TouchPad was pretty good one for browsing and stuff you listed.

You can always estimate the value of your current laptop, and buy a rather cheaper one, a Netbook, if you may, to get you through the year.

Reason to got through this , if you buy some Windows 7 tablet now, you might get around with it, and feel good that you got one and all, but later this year, its re-sale value will fade away. Almost entirely.

And running Windows 8 on it may not be as good as running it on the newer ones.

Also, almost all of the current 7 tablets have average displays, so that gives you another reason to wait.

Waiting sucks, but in this case, I assure you, it will pay-off

Yeah the TP is ok for browsing etc, but I'm fed up with the compromise that I'm having to mess around with using half baked CM9, plus its not got internal GPS capability which is frustrating (I bought a fire sale at very short notice TP thinking it had GPS).

I also dislike the low screen resolution and the fact its not 16:9.

Worst of all, its not got usb slots (again something I only realised after purchase) which mean I cannot plug in a portable GPS receiver and pair it with my Omnia 7 via bluetooth to use in my car.

If I could get Windows 8 on the Touchpad I'd sell my laptop now & keep the TP until pricing for next gen Windows 8 tablets drops in 2013.

I would hold on a few months, Windows 8 tablets are not quite here yet and I say it will be well worth the wait rather than getting one that is running 7

Saying that, I know the "ICONIA TAB W500" can run 7 and I imagine it will run 8 as well if not better

W500 not only can run it, it ships with it hence the "W" in the model number. And yes, it runs Windows 8 CP x86 just fine, if you run x64 you lose the GSensor and Bluetooth drivers. Other then that, it's smooth as butter. And that tablet can be had on amazon for... $525 ish?

Laptops don't have much resale value given you can get a good enough system for under $500 with warranty if you buy brand new, touchpad wouldn't have much resale value either. At the moment you'll be quite limited, I wouldn't get intel graphics and nVidia currently has major problems with the CP. Off hand the acer iconia w500 uses AMD Fusion, so decent graphics and a similarly 'decent' CPU. The price i think is still a bit high, and with the res you wouldn't get full windows 8 functionality. Unless the w500 is second hand, i don't think you could get it for your stated budget

Laptops don't have much resale value given you can get a good enough system for under $500 with warranty if you buy brand new, touchpad wouldn't have much resale value either. At the moment you'll be quite limited, I wouldn't get intel graphics and nVidia currently has major problems with the CP. Off hand the acer iconia w500 uses AMD Fusion, so decent graphics and a similarly 'decent' CPU. The price i think is still a bit high, and with the res you wouldn't get full windows 8 functionality. Unless the w500 is second hand, i don't think you could get it for your stated budget

Yeah my laptop was ?600 new last July, so I'd expect it to go for ?400/?450 seeing that its in perfect condition. My touchpad I'd be happy for ?120 with touchstone dock.

Then I can spend ?500 ish on a tablet whenever I come to buy one.

A refurbished / second hand W500 for ?200 or less would be a perfect buy for me I'd be happy with that.

Are there particular things that take advantage of the hardware of your current laptop?

I mean if you can sell it for a handsome amount, and get a netbook of some sort, just to get things going till October/November

If you want it in your car, I'd suggest something small for safety reasons, like a UMPC or a netvertible...

EDIT: BTW, I have a netvertible that I installed Windows 8 on & love it, just saying... ('Course, remember that you might have to install some drivers/edit the registry in order to meet the required screen resolution to run Metro apps on these kind of small tablets...)

EDIT 2: Also, smaller tablets tend to have lower price... & that could really be helpful since you want a real Tablet PC, & not 1 of those, "tablets..." They tend to cost more due to being actual PCs, so, I'd go with the smaller stuff...

Thanks for your replies so far.

I am totally torn with what to do - whether to wait or sell my LT & Touchpad asap & take plunge with a W500 etc.

Anyone know what the expected retail of w8 tablets will be at time of release?

I'd really like 3G/GPS capabilities so may be worth the wait just for that.

Thanks for your replies so far.

I am totally torn with what to do - whether to wait or sell my LT & Touchpad asap & take plunge with a W500 etc.

Anyone know what the expected retail of w8 tablets will be at time of release?

I'd really like 3G/GPS capabilities so may be worth the wait just for that.

I'd wait. The W500 is good but the C-50 APU has its limits. Plus Windows 8 will mandate NFC, gyroscopes and more for certified hardware. The W500 will run W8 fine but eventually wont be able to take advantage of all its features. A few months down the line there could be an updated W500 thats lighter, faster and priced similarly. I'd wait for that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!