Stripped-down Xbox due in late 2013


Recommended Posts

With the price you can get a 360 for in the UK now you'd be daft to buy one of these (especially late 2013, a 360 will probably go for like ?50-70 then).

I have no idea how one of these for $100-ish would seem competitive in 2013.

True. Dell.com was selling Xbox 360 for $129 the other day, surely Microsoft can get it down to $99 by middle of next year to compete with Apple TV. The thing that strikes me is "to compete with Apple TV", really? :D that device is a complete failure and their real competition is (as of today) roku or may be Google if it manages to salvage Google TV by then.

True. Dell.com was selling Xbox 360 for $129 the other day, surely Microsoft can get it down to $99 by middle of next year to compete with Apple TV. The thing that strikes me is "to compete with Apple TV", really? :D that device is a complete failure and their real competition is (as of today) roku or may be Google if it manages to salvage Google TV by then.

Sometimes the smaller form factor of these "TV devices" is nice, but me personally, I'd take something a bit better rounded (specs/functions) under my TV any day (if I weren't a gamer I'd have a modest HTPC hooked up). That's just me though.

I really don't like having numerous boxes under my TV, to me, it's crowded enough as it is with a PS3 and audio receiver :laugh:

now i know why MS is doing it...

Entertainment apps now more popular than multiplayer gaming on Xbox Live

By Kyle Orland | Published 13 minutes ago

Mark your calendars folks; today is the day that Microsoft officially succeeded in its efforts to transform the Xbox 360 from merely a video game system to a bona-fide general purpose living room set-top box. That's because, for the first time ever, Microsoft now says that time spent on general "entertainment" use of Xbox Live has officially surpassed time spent on multiplayer gaming.

The total hours spent on Xbox Live have increased 30 percent year over year, Microsoft said, growing to an incredible 84 hours a month average for Xbox Live Gold members (that average stood at 60 hours last June). Most of that growth came from increased use of entertainment apps such as Netflix, Hulu Plus, ESPN and Zune Marketplace on Xbox Live, which Microsoft says saw more than double the usage over the last year. With today's release of new entertainment apps including Comcast, HBO Go and MLB.tv, that rate of increase seems likely to continue.

For those worried that Microsoft's focus may now start to slowly shift away from the Xbox 360's once-primary gaming functions, it should be noted that multiplayer gaming usage on Xbox Live also grew in the past year, though Microsoft didn't say precisely how much (Xbox Live reportedly served up over 4 billion person hours of multiplayer gaming through last March, so further growth is almost gravy at this point). Also keep in mind that these stats don't take into account time spent playing single-player Xbox 360 games, which might tip the usage balance back towards gaming.

Still, we should probably have taken Microsoft at its word when it said before last year's E3 that "Xbox used to be solely in the games business, but the business is on a different trajectory now. What was launched as the ultimate gaming machine has quickly evolved to become an all-in-one entertainment device with something for every member of the household."

http://arstechnica.c...tm_campaign=rss

This is a fail. Normal tech-illiterate people will buy this expecting all thir games to work and they will bitch and complain. uhhhh.....what ever happened to if it's not broken don't fix it. This applys to Zune (dropped decent product), Windows 8 (where do I start? Oh wait there's not a menu for that anymore), and this "new" xbox. Bill Gates needs to come back to Microsoft and rip people some new ones.

I imagine we'll have to wait until E3 in June for the final details, but something like this makes a lot of sense. I don't know how popular it will actually be, but it will at least make Sony and Nintendo scramble to counter it in one way or another. Apple probably won't be too affected, but Sony, especially, is in a rough spot. Not only was their gaming division late on turning a profit, but the company as a whole isn't doing well. Any gaming-related products MS lobs out there will be a blow to Sony in the next-gen cold war.

I imagine we'll have to wait until E3 in June for the final details, but something like this makes a lot of sense. I don't know how popular it will actually be, but it will at least make Sony and Nintendo scramble to counter it in one way or another. Apple probably won't be too affected, but Sony, especially, is in a rough spot. Not only was their gaming division late on turning a profit, but the company as a whole isn't doing well. Any gaming-related products MS lobs out there will be a blow to Sony in the next-gen cold war.

Next gen?

This is a "gimped" Xbox 360 essentially, it's not going to cause any effect to anyone in a years time with how cheap the PS3 and 360 will be. I can only see this appealing to those who like how it looks, or don't know any better in a year (when they'd be better off getting a 360).

The only thing MS could do to make this compete with a 360 on a media level is give this better codec support, as the 360 lacks in certain codec abilities compared to the PS3.

It's a move that may have done well coming out asap with a cheaper RRP than a 360, but I have absolutely no idea how MS think it'll be a good idea in a years time. It simply seems like another product to try and flood the market with so they can say they have an "Apple TV competitor".

Buy a 360, avoid this.

Sounds like an Xbox Lite, for quick downloadable games. Not sure who would be in the market for such a machine, they could well prove me wrong though.

Allow me to prove you wrong. :D

I use my Xbox 360 to stream movies from various services. Rarely do I play video games. I just want a device that can stream my content from my Windows computer, Netflix, Hulu, HBO and Cinamax Go. Amazon, Vudu and YouTube would be a plus (but that's a stretch). I would gladly buy it if it is around $99 - $149.

So far I have the Apple TV, Google TV and the Xbox 360. Google TV is better than Apple TV in that it has more content. However, the Google TV hardware I have is built on an Atom processor so Apple TV is a lot nicer. Xbox 360 is the best out of the three but it has some drawbacks. It doesn't have all the content I need (but it is slowly getting there); it is noisy (fans) and so much overhead. A slimmed down version would be perfect and hopefully by then more services will be available.

Allow me to prove you wrong. :D

I use my Xbox 360 to stream movies from various services. Rarely do I play video games. I just want a device that can stream my content from my Windows computer, Netflix, Hulu, HBO and Cinamax Go. Amazon, Vudu and YouTube would be a plus (but that's a stretch). I would gladly buy it if it is around $99 - $149.

So far I have the Apple TV, Google TV and the Xbox 360. Google TV is better than Apple TV in that it has more content. However, the Google TV hardware I have is built on an Atom processor so Apple TV is a lot nicer. Xbox 360 is the best out of the three but it has some drawbacks. It doesn't have all the content I need (but it is slowly getting there); it is noisy (fans) and so much overhead. A slimmed down version would be perfect and hopefully by then more services will be available.

I agree with most of what you say, but I think the priceline is too expensive, already an xbox 360 arcade can be purchased for $129.

I use my xbox to stream video from my windows PC all the time, they really need to work on the media player on the dashboard, it's pretty barebones and the content list is pretty lame

I'm not saying they need to bloat that thing up though, just make the content list take up more of the screen, allowing for longer filenames and add some codec support, maybe a Play All option

Next gen?

This is a "gimped" Xbox 360 essentially, it's not going to cause any effect to anyone in a years time with how cheap the PS3 and 360 will be. I can only see this appealing to those who like how it looks, or don't know any better in a year (when they'd be better off getting a 360).

The only thing MS could do to make this compete with a 360 on a media level is give this better codec support, as the 360 lacks in certain codec abilities compared to the PS3.

It's a move that may have done well coming out asap with a cheaper RRP than a 360, but I have absolutely no idea how MS think it'll be a good idea in a years time. It simply seems like another product to try and flood the market with so they can say they have an "Apple TV competitor".

Buy a 360, avoid this.

You're missing the point. It's a cold war for the next generation. Both companies want to extend the lifetime of their current gen consoles, even though their next gen systems are being developed. Neither wants to show their hand, but both want to remain relevant. Microsoft is simply launching a product to increase it relevance without having to invest heavily in expensive hardware. Sony can choose to ignore it and forfeit that portion of the market, or they spend valuable resources to respond to it in some way. In either case, because Sony is financially troubled, it affects the success of their next gen platform.

  • Like 1

$99 makes sense if you don't have to pay for Live.

True, the way I use it as a media device though, Live is not required

But if people could use Netflix and such without the live gold requirement, I could see the $99 pricepoint working

Not that it should be a requirement on the xbox 360 in the first place though, but that's another issue.

Allow me to prove you wrong. :D

I use my Xbox 360 to stream movies from various services. Rarely do I play video games. I just want a device that can stream my content from my Windows computer, Netflix, Hulu, HBO and Cinamax Go. Amazon, Vudu and YouTube would be a plus (but that's a stretch). I would gladly buy it if it is around $99 - $149.

So far I have the Apple TV, Google TV and the Xbox 360. Google TV is better than Apple TV in that it has more content. However, the Google TV hardware I have is built on an Atom processor so Apple TV is a lot nicer. Xbox 360 is the best out of the three but it has some drawbacks. It doesn't have all the content I need (but it is slowly getting there); it is noisy (fans) and so much overhead. A slimmed down version would be perfect and hopefully by then more services will be available.

i can solve all of your problems right now

http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=HOW-TO:Install_XBMC_on_Apple_TV_2

Next gen?

This is a "gimped" Xbox 360 essentially, it's not going to cause any effect to anyone in a years time with how cheap the PS3 and 360 will be. I can only see this appealing to those who like how it looks, or don't know any better in a year (when they'd be better off getting a 360).

The only thing MS could do to make this compete with a 360 on a media level is give this better codec support, as the 360 lacks in certain codec abilities compared to the PS3.

It's a move that may have done well coming out asap with a cheaper RRP than a 360, but I have absolutely no idea how MS think it'll be a good idea in a years time. It simply seems like another product to try and flood the market with so they can say they have an "Apple TV competitor".

Buy a 360, avoid this.

Except it comes with kinec, and the intended customer is not a gamer, for the gamers there's still the Xbox, the intended customer for this, is the same as for the apple tv. A technologically illiterate user who just wants to turn the device on and watch tv series and rent movies. Without going through silly smart tv menus or game console menus that make no sense to them.

Except it comes with kinec, and the intended customer is not a gamer, for the gamers there's still the Xbox, the intended customer for this, is the same as for the apple tv. A technologically illiterate user who just wants to turn the device on and watch tv series and rent movies. Without going through silly smart tv menus or game console menus that make no sense to them.

I know that customer exists, but it wouldn't stop me telling them buying a 360 is much better value for them.

Seriously? Who plays arcade games anymore?

Mmmmm.....Maybe my grandmother.

Depends on how you define Arcade, Alan Wake's American Nightmare, I Am Alive, Shadow Complex, these are all Arcade titles, yet I doubt your grandmother would be interested in them.

Let's see...using the extremely popular Xbox brand name to market a set top device that has a ton of media functionality with its video and music apps. And you can control all of that with your voice and hands. And it plays Xbox Live Arcade games. Sounds like a winner to me. Whether or not it's worth whatever they decide to charge for it is moot - people are going to eat this up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!