• 0

Question

Fast copy software for internal network traffics

Urgently required

Hello

Urgently for business ... looking for the most fastest software for data copy or data transfer in internal network between computers in the same network

I've goggled and found TeraCopy and RichCopy to be the most fastest tools around

When I test both of them I've found it is maximum 9:10 MB/second ... which is really slow for our needs

Please advise for a tool free or paid that could be as fast as possible?

Note: lan is about 20 node ... and daily data traffics in between is about 150:200 GB/day ... Yes we do work in that volume in a daily base ... so please advise for a suitable one?

Also all computers running windows 7 and XP

Recommended Posts

  • 0
And what was the result of your iperf test, to see what speed you were seeing on your gig network? I just reread this thread, and you never did the actual speed test of your disks.. So how do we know if the bottle neck was your disks or your network speed? You just reported the info on the disk, you never ran the actual speed tests that were suggested multiple times!!! If your saying your seeing better speed with SSD - what speed???
Please advise for what tests I need to do as I do not know of any.
  • 0

I'd say a four-fold increase over what you had before is pretty good.

There maybe other things you can tweak to get a few more Mbs but its sounds like you are going replace a lot of hardware.

Start saving money, and enjoy the fact that you can now transfer files 4-times faster than before in the meantime.

  • 0

back here

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1067154-fast-copy-software-for-internal-network-traffics/page__view__findpost__p__594785912

Do a iperf test to see what speeds you get on the wire

another example

C:\Windows\system32>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 18854 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.00 GBytes   861 Mbits/sec

C:\Windows\system32>

You can grab iperf here

http://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf/files/jperf/jperf%202.0.0/jperf-2.0.0.zip/download

Its a binary in the zip file, or use the java frontend that comes with it - or grab netio and use that for testing.

http://www.ars.de/ars/ars.nsf/docs/netio

And then do a actual speed test on your disks.. Not just posting their info.

http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalDiskMark/index-e.html

from this we can if your network or your disk is your bottleneck -- so in theory my network can do in that test 861Mbps /8 = 107MBps, but if your only seeing like 300 or something which would be like 300/8 = 37.5MBytes per sec, does not matter if your disks could read 100MBps sustained if your network is the bottleneck.

  • 0

Gbit you will only see 800-900Mb/s tops That whole you will never see more than 90% of its capability comes into play here as well. Roughly that is 80-90MB/s.

And we haven't gotten that yet now that our SharePoint servers are on 10G. Our network guy is trying to figure out why. lol. I think on one test, we copied 32GB in 60 seconds.

  • 0

back here

http://www.neowin.ne...t__p__594785912

Do a iperf test to see what speeds you get on the wire

another example

C:\Windows\system32>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 18854 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval	   Transfer	 Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.00 GBytes   861 Mbits/sec

C:\Windows\system32>

You can grab iperf here

http://sourceforge.n....0.zip/download

Its a binary in the zip file, or use the java frontend that comes with it - or grab netio and use that for testing.

http://www.ars.de/ar....nsf/docs/netio

And then do a actual speed test on your disks.. Not just posting their info.

http://crystalmark.i...rk/index-e.html

from this we can if your network or your disk is your bottleneck -- so in theory my network can do in that test 861Mbps /8 = 107MBps, but if your only seeing like 300 or something which would be like 300/8 = 37.5MBytes per sec, does not matter if your disks could read 100MBps sustained if your network is the bottleneck.

8DlOMl.jpg

I stopped reading the original post as soon as I encountered "most fastest".

welcome back then, yes most fastest is the one I am looking for.

And we haven't gotten that yet now that our SharePoint servers are on 10G. Our network guy is trying to figure out why. lol. I think on one test, we copied 32GB in 60 seconds.

awesome traffics indeed.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Because Chrome is doing it. And no one said anyone had to update immediately. That's silly. They could update every day for all I care as long as it's fast, and the next time the browser restarts, you're good. And the basic point is not to tee it up for bigger updates. As it is right now, all the windows I had open reopen anyway except inprivate.
    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!