• 0

Question

Fast copy software for internal network traffics

Urgently required

Hello

Urgently for business ... looking for the most fastest software for data copy or data transfer in internal network between computers in the same network

I've goggled and found TeraCopy and RichCopy to be the most fastest tools around

When I test both of them I've found it is maximum 9:10 MB/second ... which is really slow for our needs

Please advise for a tool free or paid that could be as fast as possible?

Note: lan is about 20 node ... and daily data traffics in between is about 150:200 GB/day ... Yes we do work in that volume in a daily base ... so please advise for a suitable one?

Also all computers running windows 7 and XP

Recommended Posts

  • 0
And what was the result of your iperf test, to see what speed you were seeing on your gig network? I just reread this thread, and you never did the actual speed test of your disks.. So how do we know if the bottle neck was your disks or your network speed? You just reported the info on the disk, you never ran the actual speed tests that were suggested multiple times!!! If your saying your seeing better speed with SSD - what speed???
Please advise for what tests I need to do as I do not know of any.
  • 0

I'd say a four-fold increase over what you had before is pretty good.

There maybe other things you can tweak to get a few more Mbs but its sounds like you are going replace a lot of hardware.

Start saving money, and enjoy the fact that you can now transfer files 4-times faster than before in the meantime.

  • 0

back here

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1067154-fast-copy-software-for-internal-network-traffics/page__view__findpost__p__594785912

Do a iperf test to see what speeds you get on the wire

another example

C:\Windows\system32>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 18854 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.00 GBytes   861 Mbits/sec

C:\Windows\system32>

You can grab iperf here

http://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf/files/jperf/jperf%202.0.0/jperf-2.0.0.zip/download

Its a binary in the zip file, or use the java frontend that comes with it - or grab netio and use that for testing.

http://www.ars.de/ars/ars.nsf/docs/netio

And then do a actual speed test on your disks.. Not just posting their info.

http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalDiskMark/index-e.html

from this we can if your network or your disk is your bottleneck -- so in theory my network can do in that test 861Mbps /8 = 107MBps, but if your only seeing like 300 or something which would be like 300/8 = 37.5MBytes per sec, does not matter if your disks could read 100MBps sustained if your network is the bottleneck.

  • 0

Gbit you will only see 800-900Mb/s tops That whole you will never see more than 90% of its capability comes into play here as well. Roughly that is 80-90MB/s.

And we haven't gotten that yet now that our SharePoint servers are on 10G. Our network guy is trying to figure out why. lol. I think on one test, we copied 32GB in 60 seconds.

  • 0

back here

http://www.neowin.ne...t__p__594785912

Do a iperf test to see what speeds you get on the wire

another example

C:\Windows\system32>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 18854 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval	   Transfer	 Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.00 GBytes   861 Mbits/sec

C:\Windows\system32>

You can grab iperf here

http://sourceforge.n....0.zip/download

Its a binary in the zip file, or use the java frontend that comes with it - or grab netio and use that for testing.

http://www.ars.de/ar....nsf/docs/netio

And then do a actual speed test on your disks.. Not just posting their info.

http://crystalmark.i...rk/index-e.html

from this we can if your network or your disk is your bottleneck -- so in theory my network can do in that test 861Mbps /8 = 107MBps, but if your only seeing like 300 or something which would be like 300/8 = 37.5MBytes per sec, does not matter if your disks could read 100MBps sustained if your network is the bottleneck.

8DlOMl.jpg

I stopped reading the original post as soon as I encountered "most fastest".

welcome back then, yes most fastest is the one I am looking for.

And we haven't gotten that yet now that our SharePoint servers are on 10G. Our network guy is trying to figure out why. lol. I think on one test, we copied 32GB in 60 seconds.

awesome traffics indeed.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I agree when are you going to read this (really poor BTW) article? Here is a better article so you actually know what is going on and answers questions you had in other comments --> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/speed-boosting-low-latency-profile-is-one-of-the-improvements-coming-to-windows-11/ It is unclear if one will be able to disable the new profile at this point but I am not seeing any reason why one would.
    • I disagree; they come off very "bitchy" and "whiny". Make a great product and combine that with a great price (free) and people will come over to your side. Or build it and they will come as they say. Constantly trying to get attention by complaining all the time, will turn people off to your product.
    • It use to be a nightmare, with LibreOffice supporting a newer draft ODF standard by default, and Microsoft Office supporting the older non-draft standard. Now that they both support the same version of ODF, they should be interoperable.
    • Brave Browser 1.91.171 by Razvan Serea Brave Browser is a lightning-fast, secure web browser that stands out from the competition with its focus on privacy, security, and speed. With features like HTTPS Everywhere and built-in tracker blocking, Brave keeps your online activities safe from prying eyes. Brave is one of the safest browsers on the market today. It blocks third-party data storage. It protects from browser fingerprinting. And it does all this by default. Speed - Brave is built on Chromium, the same technology that powers Google Chrome, and is optimized for speed, providing a fast and responsive browsing experience. Brave Browser also features Brave Rewards, a system that rewards users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) for viewing opt-in ads. This innovative system provides an alternative revenue model for content creators and a way to support the Brave community. SlimBrave Neo takes all the good things about Brave and makes them even better by keeping everything clean, light, and privacy-focused. It removes the extra clutter, turns off features you might not need, and cuts down on anything that could slow you down or collect unnecessary data. Because it relies on simple settings and policies instead of modifying the browser itself, you still get full Brave compatibility—just in a smoother, lighter, and more privacy-friendly package. Brave Browser 1.91.171 changelog: General Fixed Cardano not being disabled on upgrade to Brave Origin. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Origin Removed “Survey Panelist” setting from brave://settings/privacy. Fixed P3A and usage ping under brave://settings/privacy being displayed on first launch on Linux. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Download: Brave Browser 64-bit | 1.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Brave Browser 32-bit View: Brave Homepage | Offline Installers | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hi. As the title suggests, I can't access the forum on my phone. I'm using Edge on Android and when I try to navigate to the forum I get a "we value your privacy" popup and none of the buttons are clickable. It effectively stonewalls me from reading any forum content.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      190
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!