• 0

Fast copy software for internal network traffics

Asked by NoUserName,

 Share

Question

Proficient

NoUserName

Posted
Posted

Fast copy software for internal network traffics

Urgently required

Hello

Urgently for business ... looking for the most fastest software for data copy or data transfer in internal network between computers in the same network

I've goggled and found TeraCopy and RichCopy to be the most fastest tools around

When I test both of them I've found it is maximum 9:10 MB/second ... which is really slow for our needs

Please advise for a tool free or paid that could be as fast as possible?

Note: lan is about 20 node ... and daily data traffics in between is about 150:200 GB/day ... Yes we do work in that volume in a daily base ... so please advise for a suitable one?

Also all computers running windows 7 and XP

84 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Proficient

NoUserName

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 23/08/2012 at 12:30, BudMan said:
And what was the result of your iperf test, to see what speed you were seeing on your gig network? I just reread this thread, and you never did the actual speed test of your disks.. So how do we know if the bottle neck was your disks or your network speed? You just reported the info on the disk, you never ran the actual speed tests that were suggested multiple times!!! If your saying your seeing better speed with SSD - what speed???
Please advise for what tests I need to do as I do not know of any.
  • 0
Grand Master

Shiranui

Posted
Posted

I'd say a four-fold increase over what you had before is pretty good.

There maybe other things you can tweak to get a few more Mbs but its sounds like you are going replace a lot of hardware.

Start saving money, and enjoy the fact that you can now transfer files 4-times faster than before in the meantime.

  • 0
Grand Master

+BudMan MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

back here

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1067154-fast-copy-software-for-internal-network-traffics/page__view__findpost__p__594785912

Do a iperf test to see what speeds you get on the wire

another example

C:\Windows\system32>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 18854 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.00 GBytes   861 Mbits/sec

C:\Windows\system32>

You can grab iperf here

http://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf/files/jperf/jperf%202.0.0/jperf-2.0.0.zip/download

Its a binary in the zip file, or use the java frontend that comes with it - or grab netio and use that for testing.

http://www.ars.de/ars/ars.nsf/docs/netio

And then do a actual speed test on your disks.. Not just posting their info.

http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalDiskMark/index-e.html

from this we can if your network or your disk is your bottleneck -- so in theory my network can do in that test 861Mbps /8 = 107MBps, but if your only seeing like 300 or something which would be like 300/8 = 37.5MBytes per sec, does not matter if your disks could read 100MBps sustained if your network is the bottleneck.

  • 0
Grand Master

briangw

Posted
Posted
  On 30/03/2012 at 16:31, sc302 said:

Gbit you will only see 800-900Mb/s tops That whole you will never see more than 90% of its capability comes into play here as well. Roughly that is 80-90MB/s.

And we haven't gotten that yet now that our SharePoint servers are on 10G. Our network guy is trying to figure out why. lol. I think on one test, we copied 32GB in 60 seconds.

  • 0
Proficient

NoUserName

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 27/08/2012 at 12:58, BudMan said:

back here

http://www.neowin.ne...t__p__594785912

Do a iperf test to see what speeds you get on the wire

another example

C:\Windows\system32>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 18854 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval	   Transfer	 Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.00 GBytes   861 Mbits/sec

C:\Windows\system32>

You can grab iperf here

http://sourceforge.n....0.zip/download

Its a binary in the zip file, or use the java frontend that comes with it - or grab netio and use that for testing.

http://www.ars.de/ar....nsf/docs/netio

And then do a actual speed test on your disks.. Not just posting their info.

http://crystalmark.i...rk/index-e.html

from this we can if your network or your disk is your bottleneck -- so in theory my network can do in that test 861Mbps /8 = 107MBps, but if your only seeing like 300 or something which would be like 300/8 = 37.5MBytes per sec, does not matter if your disks could read 100MBps sustained if your network is the bottleneck.

8DlOMl.jpg
  On 27/08/2012 at 13:04, Rohdekill said:

I stopped reading the original post as soon as I encountered "most fastest".

welcome back then, yes most fastest is the one I am looking for.
  On 27/08/2012 at 13:06, briangw said:

And we haven't gotten that yet now that our SharePoint servers are on 10G. Our network guy is trying to figure out why. lol. I think on one test, we copied 32GB in 60 seconds.

awesome traffics indeed.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft AI diagnoses complex medical cases four times better than human doctors

      By zikalify · Posted

      Microsoft AI diagnoses complex medical cases four times better than human doctors by Paul Hill Microsoft AI has revealed that its AI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO) is able to correctly diagnose 85% of complex cases from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) case proceedings. What makes this more impressive is that the cases published in NEJM are very diagnostically complex and intellectually demanding. They typically require multiple specialists and diagnostic tests to reach a definitive diagnosis, so the fact AI can get it right most of the time is a big deal. The MAI-DxO turns language models into a virtual panel of clinicians that is able to ask follow-up questions, order tests, or deliver diagnoses. MAI-DxO boosted the diagnostic performance of every model that was tested by Microsoft, with the best results when it was paired with OpenAI’s o3. When MAI-DxO was using o3, it was able to correctly solve 85.5% of NEJM benchmark cases. Microsoft compared this to humans; it took 21 practicing physicians from the US and UK with 5-20 years of clinical experience, and on the same tasks, they achieved a mean accuracy of just 20% across completed cases. Microsoft believes that these tools can significantly shake up healthcare by empowering patients to self-manage routine aspects of care and equipping clinicians with advanced decision support for complex cases. To find out how AI would perform on the NEJM cases, Microsoft had to create the Sequential Diagnosis Benchmark (SD Bench) which transforms 304 recent NEJM cases into stepwise diagnostic encounters. Models can then iteratively ask questions and order tests. As new information becomes available, the model will update its reasoning and gradually move toward a final diagnosis which can be compared to what was published in the NEJM. As mentioned before, the MAI-DxO system emulates a virtual panel of physicians that is able to ask follow-up questions, order tests, or deliver diagnoses. Aside from this, it can operate within defined cost constraints to help prevent excessive testing. While Microsoft’s experiment is showing very promising results, this research is just a first step. Before generative AI can be used safely in healthcare scenarios, more evidence needs to be gathered from real clinical environments. There also need to be appropriate governance and regulatory frameworks to make sure models are reliable and safe. To accomplish all of this, Microsoft is partnering with health organizations to test and validate its approaches before any broader rollout.
    • Ex-Microsoft executive: Xbox strategy is chaotic and company's console business is dead

      By d5aqoëp · Posted

      Rubbish talentless people hired on basis of filling a certain quota will always lead to rubbish company decisions. I am stumped at the thought that people are still OK with DEI after the hell that the gaming industry is going through.
    • Ex-Microsoft executive: Xbox strategy is chaotic and company's console business is dead

      By fernan99 · Posted

      I mean, to say that Xbox lost is soul, is the exact same argument you could make about Sony. Clearly, the console space is not the as it was a decade ago, as it was a decade before that and another before that. Generational shifts and market trends clearly defined the space we're currently at. One thing is clear, gaming is not going anywhere, it only continues to grow, for better or for worse. Microsoft pivoted to a publisher focused, and now they want to dominate console streaming, which they seem to have a considerable leg up over Sony on this regard as Internet reliability and speeds keep improving, console hardware might not be a feasible model unless you follow the Nintendo route of making the hardware at a profit (considering its limitations). Also, it seems now that Microsoft pivoted the Xbox branding, that could open the door for 3rd party hardware companies make Consoles that run Windows-Xbox OS, which is something interesting to consider, which would convert Xbox into an Android like approach.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steffan · Posted

    • UK planning measures to stop illegal content from going viral

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      UK planning measures to stop illegal content from going viral by Usama Jawad Image via Pixabay A few days ago, we learned that the UK's digital regulator Ofcom has mandated adult websites like Pornhub to put robust age check mechanisms in place to ensure that age-inappropriate content like pornography is not readily available to minors. Now, the government-approved authority has set its sights on a new target. According to an announcement on its website, Ofcom is now holding a consultation period for a set of measures it is proposing to curb the spread of illegal content online. These methods are a part of Ofcom's "Year of Action" initiative, where the regulator is taking decisive practical actions to ensure the online safety of the UK's citizens. Ofcom is proposing the implementation of better recommender systems and crisis response protocols to restrict illegal content from going viral online. In addition, it has also proposed the utilization of proactive mechanisms like hash checks for illegal images to nip the problem in the bud and not even allow any such visual content to be published online. Furthermore, the regulator will be asking tech firms and social media platform owners to leverage artificial intelligence systems in order to detect content like fraud and suicide. People who regularly engage in the practice of publication of illegal content online will also be punished with new sanctions. Lastly, Ofcom wants to build upon its existing child protection codes and capabilities online. It is planning to do this by placing restrictions on interactions between minors and streamers during livestreams. It will urge website owners to block users who share child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and is also proposing the development of AI tools to detect grooming activities and CSAM. The consultation period is open until 5pm on October 20, 2025. Ofcom is soliciting feedback from "service providers", law enforcement authorities, and the public until that deadline to finalize its proposal.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      TIGOSS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      henryj earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      CarolynHelen earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      henryj earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Community Regular
      Primey_ went up a rank
      Community Regular

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      194
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      164
    4. 4
      Xenon
      81
    5. 5
      Som
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!