is it worth it upgrading this pc?


Recommended Posts

http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/ca/en/ho/WF06b/12132708-12133156-12133158-12133158-12133158-80626463-81048856.html?dnr=1

this is my PC

but a few things I have upgraded on it over time.

OS is Windows 8 consumer preview 64 bit

i have 2 external hard drives.

Iomega- 1TB

clickfree- 2TB

Video card- sonic GF 9600gt 512mb PCI-X

Acer V193 17" lcd monitor

i'm trying to get back to computer games,

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1067234-is-it-worth-it-upgrading-this-pc/
Share on other sites

When you say upgrade I'm guessing you mean keep the motherboard and perhaps upgrade the Memory and Graphics?

Based on the specifications listed on that page I would say this is using hardware from around late 2005 to early 2006. That was 6 years ago and I'd not recommend upgrading it. You would probably do yourself better buying a new system.

However if you really just want to upgrade then perhaps a GTX 560 would be appropriate. It would definitely be faster than the 9600GT you currently have but I'm not really sure how much of an improvement it would make with that processor. The latest games are more CPU demanding than that processor can muster.

any significant upgrades would require a mobo swap and that more then likely wouldnt be compatable with the case you have ( front harness). would prolly be cheaper to just get a new one.

i would get amd 6850 or 5770 for that system if you're an occasional gamer like me.But if you're a hardcore gamer then you would have to upgrade cpu-mobo-ram all together.Probably something like i5 or i7 series with amd 7950 or nvidia equivalent and throwing an ssd drive would be the cream on top

It would cost more to upgrade than it's worth to. Sorry mate. :(

agreed.

you could do some upgrades but i don't think they would really be worth it at this point.

you could spend $150-3 hundred on upgrades or get a brand new pre-built oem pc for around 500 or less. but everything in it would be dramatically faster than any upgrade you could make to your old computer.

if you don't want to build your own get a cheap oem pc, then clean install windows with the key on the side of your new pc. also try and get something that is upgrade friendly. (as much as it can for an oem)

Here's what you do. Buy a Geforce GTX 560Ti and put it in your current system and see if it runs to your liking. There's a good chance that it will because you only have a 17" monitor.

If you find your CPU isn't up to the task, then you go ahead and buy a cheap prebuilt i5 system and use the 560Ti to upgrade from the onboard graphics, then you'll most certainly be set.

Here's what you do. Buy a Geforce GTX 560Ti and put it in your current system and see if it runs to your liking. There's a good chance that it will because you only have a 17" monitor.

If you find your CPU isn't up to the task, then you go ahead and buy a cheap prebuilt i5 system and use the 560Ti to upgrade from the onboard graphics, then you'll most certainly be set.

+1

Here's what you do. Buy a Geforce GTX 560Ti and put it in your current system and see if it runs to your liking. There's a good chance that it will because you only have a 17" monitor.

If you find your CPU isn't up to the task, then you go ahead and buy a cheap prebuilt i5 system and use the 560Ti to upgrade from the onboard graphics, then you'll most certainly be set.

Wouldn't recommend that as pre-built systems tend to come with restrictive power supplies. I would just build a straight down new computer, if you want to run the latest and greatest games at the highest quality possible. Otherise your computer should be ok, if you play games at lower quality and lower resolutions.

hello all I would like to keep the 9600gt but get new ram, cpu, motherboard

and I prefer amd then intel.

You're making all the bad choices for gaming.

1: More RAM, a better CPU and a better motherboard really won't increase your gaming performance quite a lot. And if you want to do that, you will have to get a new case too. And you really wouldn't get a big performance increase at all, your graphics card is limiting you in this case.

2: And why would you prefer AMD? Intel processors perform so much better right now, even when you take price into account Intel still is a much better deal in almost any case in my opinion.

Intel processor and AMD graphics are the best way to go.

Nothing beats a 6850 in terms of value for money at the moment, if you have a budget. Nothing comes close.

i5-2400

Cheapish H67 Motherboard

8Gb DDR3 Ram

HD 6850

400 - 500W 80+ PSU

Save the drives from your current system for now. Maybe get a larger internal hard drive, if you need one.

hello all I would like to keep the 9600gt but get new ram, cpu, motherboard

and I prefer amd then intel.

As Yoda said, "you must unlearn, what you have learned" -

9600gt - is not a gamer card not even 5 years ago, AMD was better than intel .... 10 years ago.

BUT if you want to get AMD - then their new stuff would be a quantum leap compared the the junk you have now, yes its junk.

As mentioned, go get a cheap, Core i5 for $350, get a $150 video card, and a good PSU - you have a modern gaming machine - enjoy.

as fas as wakers comments about the HDD - if they are half as old as the rest of that dinosaur - then you're already on borrowed time - and the act of installing an OS could very well push an HDD over the edge - then what have you got ?

If you realize this, and are trying to spread out the $$ - then keep the drive - but always knowing in the back of your mind that it can and will go out @ any minute ... you decide.

The HDD is one of the few pieces with moving parts - therefore it wears out. Avg. life is 4 years on a drive - buy a new one.

As Yoda said, "you must unlearn, what you have learned" -

9600gt - is not a gamer card not even 5 years ago, AMD was better than intel .... 10 years ago.

BUT if you want to get AMD - then their new stuff would be a quantum leap compared the the junk you have now, yes its junk.

As mentioned, go get a cheap, Core i5 for $350, get a $150 video card, and a good PSU - you have a modern gaming machine - enjoy.

as fas as wakers comments about the HDD - if they are half as old as the rest of that dinosaur - then you're already on borrowed time - and the act of installing an OS could very well push an HDD over the edge - then what have you got ?

If you realize this, and are trying to spread out the $$ - then keep the drive - but always knowing in the back of your mind that it can and will go out @ any minute ... you decide.

The HDD is one of the few pieces with moving parts - therefore it wears out. Avg. life is 4 years on a drive - buy a new one.

4 years?

I've got one that I've been using intensively for over 8 years and it's still in top health. Very small though!

Yeah that's way off from my experience. We've got about 20 computers at work, most of which have HDDs that go back to 2005/2006. Never had a failure. I've got HDDs at home that still work and are over 10 years old.

The figures may be skewed by "production error" failures - i.e. brand new drives that go kaput because something went wrong (as opposed to them being too old). If you take out the data from faulty drives that die within 6 months, I'd be very surprised if the average life of an HDD was anything less than 8 years.

Oh, and to the OP: your GPU is just way way too old for gaming. You could get yourself a GTX 560Ti and see if that helps - if it doesn't, just build yourself a new PC and stick it in there. Personally, I always love an excuse to build a new gaming computer, so that's what I'd do.

4 yrs. ?? It was the CTO @ Seagate in a MaximumPC article last year - I used to read that mag everyday :blush:

Might be able to reference it elsewhere - he was talking about the silliness of MTBF & 512-bit encryption type things. (because 256 is so easy to brute force kinda of talk)

I remember almost 100% of what I read (kinda nerdy I know) he was kinda funny but was serious when talking about real lifetime as opposed to MTBF.

How silly it is to undermine SSD {A} because its only 1.5 million hours MTBF, as opposed to SSD {B} which is2 million hours MTBF. How people will automatically think SSD {A} is not as good and will fail soon...

I'll google some phrases see if I get ahit & I'll post it - not for austerity - just because it was an interesting read. (it was before all the floods)

  • 2 weeks later...

hello everyone I did some research on computers, these are sold at my local computer store, all prices are in Canadian, I want to use my current video card http://ncix.com/products/?sku=28598, with the system. these are the current systems that they sell.

HP pavilion s5-1020- 499.99

HP pavilion p7-1125-569.99

HP pavilion p7-115-679.99

HP pavilion p6640f-799.99

HP pavilion h8-1010-839.99

would like to play battlefield 3 and newer games at high

hello everyone I did some research on computers, these are sold at my local computer store, all prices are in Canadian, I want to use my current video card http://ncix.com/products/?sku=28598, with the system. these are the current systems that they sell.

HP pavilion s5-1020- 499.99

HP pavilion p7-1125-569.99

HP pavilion p7-115-679.99

HP pavilion p6640f-799.99

HP pavilion h8-1010-839.99

would like to play battlefield 3 and newer games at high

A 9600GT won't get you anywhere near high settings in BF3.

To do that, you'll need at least an i5 w/ 560 Ti card, and even that might be cutting it close.

at least an i5 with 560ti? Id say for maximum. He could easily get high settings with a i3 and a 6870. I run battlefield 3 on high at a resolution of 5760x1080 at around 50fps on the setup below.. There is also a pc in my house from around 4 years ago (X4 9850, 4GB DDR2 and crossfire 4670...) that runs battlefield 3 at high, quite well for its age.

at least an i5 with 560ti? Id say for maximum. He could easily get high settings with a i3 and a 6870. I run battlefield 3 on high at a resolution of 5760x1080 at around 50fps on the setup below.. There is also a pc in my house from around 4 years ago (X4 9850, 4GB DDR2 and crossfire 4670...) that runs battlefield 3 at high, quite well for its age.

BF3 is CPU intensive and an i3 would be a limiting factor. Might as well spend the few extra bucks for a quad core.

Also, you do know that your 6950 is almost an exact equivalent to the 560 Ti, right? Resolution for you isn't a big deal either since yours has 2GB of VRAM.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      449
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      93
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!