• 0

Easy and simple guide to create a Subversion (SVN) server in Windows?


Question

Hey

Ive been literally killing myself looking up guides but most are way outdated and/or complicated. I tried a few simply ones but they simply appear to be out of date.

Can someone point me on a easy way to set it up in Windows? Ive been trying to use (as a client) TortoiseSVN but I simply cant get it to work. So I need something simply and easy.....

Thanks a lot!

18 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 14:28, hjf288 said:

http://www.codinghor...on-windows.html

You need to run a server before you can connect using the client and its detailed on there

or use:

http://www.visualsvn.com/server/

Both look good. Im going to try the VisualSVN as the GUI way looks alot easier :p

Its for a Java project, but I perfer a generic version. Both of these look pretty generic so....

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 14:28, hjf288 said:

A big +1 for VisualSVN; dead easy to configure and maintain yet still runs Apache at its core, plus it integrates nicely into the Microsoft Management Console so it can be administered very easily remotely as well. Can use SVN or Windows authentication. Depending on your needs though you don't even really need a server, TortoiseSVN can make a file based repository that can be on a network share faster than it took me to type that.

If you use Visual Studio, their client is quite good too. (Wraps around Tortoise.)

  • 0

Setting it up locally was pretty easy :)

Now the remote access is the hard part....

Lets say the url is: http://computernamehere.somelocaldomain.local:3980/svn/

How can someone access that from the outside? Thats what I cant really do.

On my internal LAN it works, but on the external I cant get it to work.

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:05, htcz said:
On my internal LAN it works, but on the external I cant get it to work.

Will most likely need to add a port forwarding rule to your router.

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:18, Max Norris said:

Will most likely need to add a port forwarding rule to your router.

Already done and nothing.

Like I said, I have a port forward rule for 8080 and that works. But it doesnt work for this (which is 3980) and it has a port forward rule too....

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:22, htcz said:
Like I said, I have a port forward rule for 8080 and that works. But it doesnt work for this (which is 3980) and it has a port forward rule too....

Ahh thought you were mentioning your firewall, not the router. Are you using SSL? (Namely, forgetting to use https instead of http per your example URL above.)

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:26, Max Norris said:

Ahh thought you were mentioning your firewall, not the router. Are you using SSL? (Namely, forgetting to use https instead of http per your example URL above.)

Well, no. But locally it works. Do I have to use SSL when accessing it on the outside?

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:28, htcz said:
Well, no. But locally it works. Do I have to use SSL when accessing it on the outside?

No, just eliminating a possible issue. Is it hitting the server and being refused, or just not seeing it at all? (That is, an authentication issue.) Also, I just saw your example URL above, you can't access the repositories node using a subversion client, need the full repository path, for example: https://svn.example.com/svn/test/ You should also be able to access the web interface remotely. I'm using the default SSL port of 443, and it's working for me remotely anyway. Make sure you're adding the port number if you're going with a non-standard port.

Copy/pasting from VisualSVN's docs:

  Quote
Note Unlike web browsers, Subversion clients are unable to access the content of the Repositories node in the VisualSVN Server Manager. In other words, you are unable to access https://svn.example.com/svn/ URL using Subversion clients such as TortoiseSVN or svn.exe.
  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:36, Max Norris said:

No, just eliminating a possible issue. Is it hitting the server and being refused, or just not seeing it at all? (That is, an authentication issue.) Also, I just saw your example URL above, you can't access the repositories node using a subversion client, need the full repository path, for example: https://svn.example.com/svn/test/

Copy/pasting from VisualSVN's docs:

Not seeing it at all. Im using a web browser both locally and remotely.

Local side I access: http://computernamehere.somelocaldomain.local:3980/svn/

Remote side I access (if 234.11.23.12 was my WAN address): http://234.11.23.12:3980

  • 0
  On 02/04/2012 at 15:38, GreyWolf said:

Many ISPs block port 80 and 8080 and other "known" HTTP access points. It's possible that's why you cannot access it externally.

8080 isnt blocked by my ISP (a service I have on 8080 works remotely), and putting in my hosts file (if my web server address was hello.dev):

234.11.23.12 hello.dev

I am able to remotely access hello.dev

I dont think this is the only port that is blocked right? It would be too much of a coincidence.....

  • 0

OK, I finally got it to work (not my fault; damn dumbed down network admins :p )

Now, my next question is how do I access this thru a SVN client? In this fashion:

svn://234.11.23.12:3980

in TortoiseSVN doesnt work. Simply cant find it....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the flub is slightly funny, albeit minor. What will be funnier is the people buying some utterly terrible Chinese Android phone for $500 (that's with a huge profit margin worked in). That said, I've bemoaned this before: I miss the days when Neowin was about Microsoft products and technologies and didn't host articles that would get people riled up politically. It used to be a friendlier place where people were only bitches about insignificant things related to Microsoft.
    • AMD thinks Ryzen Threadripper 9000 wipes the floor with Intel by Sayan Sen At Computex 2025 earlier this year, AMD revealed its new Zen 5-based Ryzen Threadripper 9000 series with up to 96 cores, comprising the PRO 9000WX series and 9000 series chips. At the time though the company did not share performance numbers but given the specs, we had a fairly good idea of their capability. For those who may not be familiar with Ryzen Threadripper, it is AMD's desktop CPU lineup meant for workstations and HEDT (high-end desktop) builds and is placed between the mainstream Ryzen and the server EPYC lineups. With the launch expected to happen next month, performance numbers for the Ryzen Threadripper 9000 are now out. Before diving into the performance details, AMD has also shared a recap of some of the platform details and the compatible sTR5 socket. These new premium chips support up to 8 channels of DDR5-6400 memory and up to 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes for I/O. AMD also promises over 7000 MT/s of DDR5 support with EXPO. The specs of the Ryzen Threadripper 9000 lineup are given below: Processor SKU Cores Threads Base Clock (GHz) Boost Clock (GHz) L3 Cache (MB) Memory Channels PCIe Lanes TDP (W) AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX 96 192 2.5 5.45 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 64 128 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX 32 64 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24 48 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX 16 32 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX 12 24 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 64 128 3.2 5.4 256 4‑channel DDR5‑6400 92 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X 32 64 3.2 5.4 256 4‑channel DDR5‑6400 92 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X 24 48 3.2 5.4 256 4‑channel DDR5‑6400 92 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD has compared the 96-core 9995WX against the previous-gen 7995WX (images below), also with the same core configuration, and the 64-core 9980X, against Intel's 60-core Xeon W9-3595X. While Xeon has generally been associated with Server CPUs, the Xeon W chips are designed to be used in workstations. AMD follows a similar naming, too, wherein the W in the WX is meant to indicate workstation, and the non-W Threadripper is for HEDT. AMD claims up to 26% faster throughput on the newer 96-core 9995WX compared to the 7995WX. Meanwhile, against the Intel Xeon w9-3595X, AMD expects utter dominance from its 9980X with up to 108% faster performance. Even the lowest gain, says the company, is 22% over the Intel chip, and that is still very significant. AMD also compared the AI performance of the 9995WX vs the Xeon w9-3595X. The company promises up to 49% faster LLM processing, but keep in mind that the figures given include a GPU as well. Besides AI, performance related to other creative and professional workloads was also shared. In Keyshot rendering, for example, AMD claims up to 119% gains over the Xeon SKU. And in Chaos V-Ray, the 9995WX is said to offer nearly 2.5 times the performance. AMD has not released pricing information for the Threadripper 9000 series.
    • Funk Microsoft - I would switch from PS5 as you have better deals but the Xbox interface (I tried One S and later on, even one X i hate the interface and considering all MS changes in Windows interface over the years.. I hope they have a good one coming ps5 has also weird interface I had to get used too. But considering the library of ps4 games I wanted to be playable for me… I got used and adapted
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Ian_ earned a badge
      First Post
    • Explorer
      JaviAl went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Reacting Well
      Cole Multipass earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Reacting Well
      JLP earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Rhydderch earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      654
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      267
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      218
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      188
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      146
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!