Do You Agree with Animal Racing?


Do You Agree with Animal Racing?  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Agree with Animal Racing?

    • Yes
      11
    • No
      13
    • Don't Really Care
      11


Recommended Posts

The Grand National, a famous race in the UK attracts regular betters while many of those bets placed are from people whom will not place another until next year.

After reading an article today on the BBC 'According to Pete', one of the horses, was put down at the scene as the horse fell at one gate breaking it's leg. It also seems there was another horse that died in the race.

My question is this: Is it right to race horses?

I am not exactly an animal lover, I have two cats and they are part of the family. Perhaps it was just the realisation that horses do die in races, whatever it is, I don't really like it. I realise removing obstacles will make it boring perhaps but is the thrill not about who is going to win or who is the fastest?

But then I would ask, what is wrong with dog fighting? Humans have boxing as a sport? We race dogs and horses which carries a risk of death? I am not in agreement with dog fighting, far from it. But for me, it begs the question.

I am also not a better. I don't bet on the lottery, horses, dogs or anything. The odds are rubbish :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1070565-do-you-agree-with-animal-racing/
Share on other sites

But then I would ask, what is wrong with dog fighting? Humans have boxing as a sport? We race dogs and horses which carries a risk of death? I am not in agreement with dog fighting, far from it. But for me, it begs the question.

The argument against dog fighting, and c*ck fighting, is that they're trained in a cruel way that gets them to be vicious, and then in the fight they're trained to be vicious and kill each other -- while people boxing are prepping themselves and have self-control in the ring.

Bullfighting is in a little bit of a different category although many people oppose that also.

Yes I agree with it. The horses are cared for and it certainly is not intended for the animal to die, and believe me the last thing the owner wants is to lose their horse. Unfortunately it is an unintended consequence because the prognosis of a broken leg is extremely poor for a horse. If the horse is not put down it will go through a lifetime of suffering.

But then I would ask, what is wrong with dog fighting? Humans have boxing as a sport?

People box because they want to, dogs are tortured and forced to do it.

If people were brought up for the sole purpose of being forced to fight in boxing matches then your comparison might have some value.

I think it's totally wrong to race or fight animals. It's wrong because they don't have a choice and are forced into it. Boxing or general human fighting (MMA etc) is different. The person has a choice to participate and is not forced into anything against their will.

horses were domesticated because of their sheer work ability. To some horses are a machine rather than a pet. I don't know anyone who has a horse for a pet actually.

They ride it, use it for field work, breeding, training, or something along that line.

I don't feel its wrong to race horses, but if you ARE going to race them they should be taken care of.

As you stated one broke its leg and was euthanized - this is basically saying, "Im in it for the money - that horse is lame for racing, so kill it" I don't agree with that at all.

They are animals with compassion and emotion, they require companionship and attention... If you want to spend 8 hours a day with the horse training it for a 5KM long race or something, so be it, just don't forget its a living creature.

As for fighting animals as brought up in the thread - Im against that. I mean, if an animal DON'T want to race, then it just won't move... Im sure people don't continually buy horses and kill them should they not want to run. I can't see how that could be profitable.

Horses also get whipped by jockeys, and in some instances, have tendons in their legs removed to keep them running even though it will eventually kill them. It's a barbaric sport and should be banned. I'm also staunchly against the caging and removal of animals from their natural environments (Zoos).

I see it as OK, as long as a particular animal is willing, and is treated well.

However, I realize there are a lot of abuses.

How would we know that the horse is willing to race? When he is also among the bettors? :D

Though I think, that the only animal sport we should have is, who treats his animal the best!

As you stated one broke its leg and was euthanized - this is basically saying, "Im in it for the money - that horse is lame for racing, so kill it" I don't agree with that at all.

What? No it's not. They're euthanised because there is a small chance of recovery, and during that time the horse will be in pain. See here.

I'm also staunchly against the caging and removal of animals from their natural environments (Zoos).

The first time I read that I thought you were insinuating that an animal's natural environment was a zoo. :laugh:

Nature is much more cruel to animals than this. Domesticated animals generally live blissful lives compared to those in the wild.

Definitely this.

I didn't vote because I'm kind of torn on this issue, I will say that I am neither a race goer or gambler.

It distresses me whenever I see an animal put down for whatever reason.

My question is, what would happen to all the unwanted animals?

It may be barbaric but it's been going on since one bloke challenged another to a race. Probably trying to win the heart of a woman. :)

Race horses do live a pretty good life but when it's over; it's over.

Feel more sorry for all the other animals that get mistreated by their misguided or cruel owners.

Didn't mean to get too deep. :blush:

The Grand National, a famous race in the UK attracts regular betters while many of those bets placed are from people whom will not place another until next year.

After reading an article today on the BBC 'According to Pete', one of the horses, was put down at the scene as the horse fell at one gate breaking it's leg. It also seems there was another horse that died in the race.

My question is this: Is it right to race horses?

I am not exactly an animal lover, I have two cats and they are part of the family. Perhaps it was just the realisation that horses do die in races, whatever it is, I don't really like it. I realise removing obstacles will make it boring perhaps but is the thrill not about who is going to win or who is the fastest?

But then I would ask, what is wrong with dog fighting? Humans have boxing as a sport? We race dogs and horses which carries a risk of death? I am not in agreement with dog fighting, far from it. But for me, it begs the question.

I am also not a better. I don't bet on the lottery, horses, dogs or anything. The odds are rubbish :p

Yes, the odds are rubbish, because all the rules are made by rich men and all the animals are pwned by rich men, for making poor men give what little money they have to the rich men in the way of betting.

Gambling on animals is for lamers

[. . .] Minnows are BORN to race.

It didn't seem like that in the video. The video depicted them being forced down the aisle with sticks, and during the times they weren't being forced, they were probably swimming forward because they had no idea what was happening and that's all they saw in front of them.

It didn't seem like that in the video. The video depicted them being forced down the aisle with sticks, and during the times they weren't being forced, they were probably swimming forward because they had no idea what was happening and that's all they saw in front of them.

I love you Calum -- but I think the sarcasm flew over your head buddy. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!