Iron Man 3 (Official Thread)


Recommended Posts

Is that confirmed yet?

Joss Whedon -

Okay. Oh, I?ve got these two characters, two of my favorite characters from the comic book; a brother-sister act. They?re in the movie. That?s exciting.? You know, you lock certain things in.

The only "brother-sister act" that makes sense would be Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, both members of the Avengers but also of the Ultimate Avengers which the films seem drawn from.

For those unfamiliar;

Quicksilver is similar to DC's Flash

Scarlet Witch can manipulate probability, and at times has changed the entire Marvel universe - even drpowering the mutants.

Their daddy is Magneto.

Just saw the movie. I thought it wasn't that bad of a movie. It had some great action scenes, some nifty dialogue between the characters, and an overall good feel watching what had digressed from the events of the Avengers. What I didn't like too much was the some discrepancies with the plot in which sort of made the feeling moot. This wasn't the strongest of the Iron Man Movies, but I still rate it as a great flick to see.

Neztea

I saw it last night, and I liked it. I don't think i like it as much as the previous two, but it was still a great action movie. There were two things in particular that I didn't like about the movie.

1. I didn't like how they handled The Mandarin. I think the look and persona of Ben Kingsley's Mandarin was awesome, and absolutely the right adaptation of the character. But then they revealed that he was just a figure-head, actor which was an extreme let down. I was almost literally drooling to see Tony and Kingsley's Mandarin duke it out in the finale, but all we got was the lame Killian Mandarin.

2. While the comedy in the Iron Man movies is and has been great, I feel like this third movie had too much of it. Or at least, had it in the wrong places. At several points, including a few during the final battle, Tony would say something or have a one-liner that just kind of killed some of the drama and urgency of the scene. It felt a little out of place. Maybe I'll feel different after watching it again, I don't know.

  • Like 2

Question in spoiler tags, maybe someone can answer me this.

Why did the Vice President get arrested at the end ? Was there something I missed, or did they just bring him to the President ?

At some point they called the vice president to warn him that the president was in danger. Then they show his daughter with a leg missing, so you can assume he was in on it with the Mandarin

At least that's what I got from it

At some point they called the vice president to warn him that the president was in danger. Then they show his daughter with a leg missing, so you can assume he was in on it with the Mandarin

At least that's what I got from it

Thanks for your reply, now it makes perfect sense.

I hated this one. Felt this was the worst of the three. The villain was horrible, the most jokes didn't fit well in the scenes, it was lacking that superhero feel and it just didn't seem like it could lead into any future movie. I hope this isn't a show of what is left for Marvel.

I hated this one. Felt this was the worst of the three. The villain was horrible, the most jokes didn't fit well in the scenes, it was lacking that superhero feel and it just didn't seem like it could lead into any future movie. I hope this isn't a show of what is left for Marvel.

Well Disney owns Marvel now...so time for another franchise to get ruined.

  • Like 1

I figure this is probably the last standalone Iron Man movie, for a while anyway. I figure Robert Downey is ready to move on to other things.

There will probably be one more Iron Man movie in between Avengers 2 and 3. Josh stated in an interview that Thanos was too powerful to be in the next avengers and he would be the ultimate finale (avengers 3). Stark/Iron Man is the corner stone of this version of the Avengers so it is highly doubtful they will not have an IM movie between Avengers 2 and 3.

http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/102269/Marvels-Plans-For-Iron-Man-4-Revealed

Of course all is subject to change :)

I pretty much exactly agree with spacer. Just wrote this on Facebook for someone asking what I thought...

So I am still not fully committed to this opinion, need a bit more time for it to fully sink in, but I believe this was my least favorite of the trilogy. Just seemed ever so slightly off. Perhaps to much comedy? Perhaps it was a pretty thin plot? Perhaps it was how it was told? Perhaps it is all of those things combined. Just know I did not leave the theater loving it, or even really liking it for that matter. It may grow on me, this sometimes happens, but for now I am saying it is the weakest movie of the trilogy.

I pretty much exactly agree with spacer. Just wrote this on Facebook for someone asking what I thought...

So I am still not fully committed to this opinion, need a bit more time for it to fully sink in, but I believe this was my least favorite of the trilogy. Just seemed ever so slightly off. Perhaps to much comedy? Perhaps it was a pretty thin plot? Perhaps it was how it was told? Perhaps it is all of those things combined. Just know I did not leave the theater loving it, or even really liking it for that matter. It may grow on me, this sometimes happens, but for now I am saying it is the weakest movie of the trilogy.

They shouldn't have changed directors...

  • Like 2

I pretty much exactly agree with spacer. Just wrote this on Facebook for someone asking what I thought...

So I am still not fully committed to this opinion, need a bit more time for it to fully sink in, but I believe this was my least favorite of the trilogy. Just seemed ever so slightly off. Perhaps to much comedy? Perhaps it was a pretty thin plot? Perhaps it was how it was told? Perhaps it is all of those things combined. Just know I did not leave the theater loving it, or even really liking it for that matter. It may grow on me, this sometimes happens, but for now I am saying it is the weakest movie of the trilogy.

I feel exactly the same thing.

I did not like how they interpreted The Mandarin tbh. It's just not right. I mean they didn't even mention the all powerful 10 Rings. The Mandarin is a huge foe for Iron Man in the Marvel universe. With them saying he's just a face.. that's like oh this Character really isn't important.The next thing that annoyed me was Iron Patriot wasn't really used for fighting. I still never saw Rodey suit up and fight along side Tony like in IM2. At least that's what I was expecting from the movie, because in IM2, it was pretty cool.

I kind of enjoyed it but I feel it is the weakest of the three movies :/

- Mandarin was wasted - all the trailers built up to him and then the reveal was terrible

- I didn't like how the movie was Stark telling his story to someone that didn't make sense because I didn't wait for the post-credits scene :/

- I am not familiar with Iron Man comics but him removing shrapnel in the end kind of ruins the whole Palladium part in IM2. I mean he could've just had it removed instead of building an entirely new material! (similar to the whole eagles mess in LOTR).

- That part with the kid was such a waste of time. :/ I am pretty sure it was to please the bean counters.

- Some weird product placements - Sun/Oracle and then FiOS in Tennessee - is it even available there?

I was surprised that the Mandarin turned out to be a persona but I don't think we should rule him out completely. I think it's possible that Ben Kingsley's character might return or we'll see the true Mandarin in the next Iron Man movie. It's also possible for Aldrich Killian to return as the Mandarin with new powers. After all, he survived the explosion of Tony's Mark 42 suit only to be taken out with a weaker explosion. Some people may not realize this but what this movie has done is establish the Mandarin's persona. Aldrich Killian may have claimed to be the Mandarin but we know that the title belongs to someone wielding 10 powerful rings. It could be him, again, with rings or it could be Ben's character tricking Tony (remember the line "you'll never see me coming").

I can understand why people are disappointed because of what we were lead to believe. The trailers and marketing did a great job at portraying Ben Kingsley's character as the Mandarin but we find out that he was simply an actor in the movie. I was disappointed too, at first, but I began to realize why Marvel did this. They couldn't jump straight into Iron Man fighting against the real Mandarin. It's too early for that. And they needed to portray Tony Stark as a regular human being (emotionally, not intellectually because he's far from normal in that aspect). He needed to fix his relationship with Pepper and move beyond the events of New York (in The Avengers). Now, he won't suffer from any more anxiety attacks and he's closer to Pepper.

Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Mandarin in Iron Man 4 or Iron Man 5. I also wouldn't be surprised to learn that the Mandarin will never return. It's entirely possible that the comic book version of the Mandarin was split into two characters: Ben's character and Aldrich Killian (minus the power rings). Killian represents the Mandarin's character with his thirst for power and hatred of Iron Man. And Ben's character represents the Mandarin's appearance and persona. Perhaps that's what Marvel truly wants and let's face it... the comic book version of the Mandarin is a little too stereotypical. I don't think a ring-wielding oriental man would've worked well in a live action movie.

They didn't show any rings in the movie because that would have made the Mandarin overpowered. However, they overcompensated by making the Extremis bad guys a little too powerful. Killian was able to slice and dice Tony's suits. And the suits use the same material as the one that Thor hit with his hammer multiple times.

Overall, I liked the movie and I consider it to be better than the second one but not as good as the first.

EDIT: Turns out it made $175.3 million over the weekend in North America alone. It's not as much as The Avengers ($207.4M) but it's more than The Dark Knight Rises ($160.9) and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 ($169.2M).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!