Iron Man 3 (Official Thread)


Recommended Posts

Is that confirmed yet?

Joss Whedon -

Okay. Oh, I?ve got these two characters, two of my favorite characters from the comic book; a brother-sister act. They?re in the movie. That?s exciting.? You know, you lock certain things in.

The only "brother-sister act" that makes sense would be Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, both members of the Avengers but also of the Ultimate Avengers which the films seem drawn from.

For those unfamiliar;

Quicksilver is similar to DC's Flash

Scarlet Witch can manipulate probability, and at times has changed the entire Marvel universe - even drpowering the mutants.

Their daddy is Magneto.

Just saw the movie. I thought it wasn't that bad of a movie. It had some great action scenes, some nifty dialogue between the characters, and an overall good feel watching what had digressed from the events of the Avengers. What I didn't like too much was the some discrepancies with the plot in which sort of made the feeling moot. This wasn't the strongest of the Iron Man Movies, but I still rate it as a great flick to see.

Neztea

I saw it last night, and I liked it. I don't think i like it as much as the previous two, but it was still a great action movie. There were two things in particular that I didn't like about the movie.

1. I didn't like how they handled The Mandarin. I think the look and persona of Ben Kingsley's Mandarin was awesome, and absolutely the right adaptation of the character. But then they revealed that he was just a figure-head, actor which was an extreme let down. I was almost literally drooling to see Tony and Kingsley's Mandarin duke it out in the finale, but all we got was the lame Killian Mandarin.

2. While the comedy in the Iron Man movies is and has been great, I feel like this third movie had too much of it. Or at least, had it in the wrong places. At several points, including a few during the final battle, Tony would say something or have a one-liner that just kind of killed some of the drama and urgency of the scene. It felt a little out of place. Maybe I'll feel different after watching it again, I don't know.

  • Like 2

Question in spoiler tags, maybe someone can answer me this.

Why did the Vice President get arrested at the end ? Was there something I missed, or did they just bring him to the President ?

At some point they called the vice president to warn him that the president was in danger. Then they show his daughter with a leg missing, so you can assume he was in on it with the Mandarin

At least that's what I got from it

At some point they called the vice president to warn him that the president was in danger. Then they show his daughter with a leg missing, so you can assume he was in on it with the Mandarin

At least that's what I got from it

Thanks for your reply, now it makes perfect sense.

I hated this one. Felt this was the worst of the three. The villain was horrible, the most jokes didn't fit well in the scenes, it was lacking that superhero feel and it just didn't seem like it could lead into any future movie. I hope this isn't a show of what is left for Marvel.

I hated this one. Felt this was the worst of the three. The villain was horrible, the most jokes didn't fit well in the scenes, it was lacking that superhero feel and it just didn't seem like it could lead into any future movie. I hope this isn't a show of what is left for Marvel.

Well Disney owns Marvel now...so time for another franchise to get ruined.

  • Like 1

I figure this is probably the last standalone Iron Man movie, for a while anyway. I figure Robert Downey is ready to move on to other things.

There will probably be one more Iron Man movie in between Avengers 2 and 3. Josh stated in an interview that Thanos was too powerful to be in the next avengers and he would be the ultimate finale (avengers 3). Stark/Iron Man is the corner stone of this version of the Avengers so it is highly doubtful they will not have an IM movie between Avengers 2 and 3.

http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/102269/Marvels-Plans-For-Iron-Man-4-Revealed

Of course all is subject to change :)

I pretty much exactly agree with spacer. Just wrote this on Facebook for someone asking what I thought...

So I am still not fully committed to this opinion, need a bit more time for it to fully sink in, but I believe this was my least favorite of the trilogy. Just seemed ever so slightly off. Perhaps to much comedy? Perhaps it was a pretty thin plot? Perhaps it was how it was told? Perhaps it is all of those things combined. Just know I did not leave the theater loving it, or even really liking it for that matter. It may grow on me, this sometimes happens, but for now I am saying it is the weakest movie of the trilogy.

I pretty much exactly agree with spacer. Just wrote this on Facebook for someone asking what I thought...

So I am still not fully committed to this opinion, need a bit more time for it to fully sink in, but I believe this was my least favorite of the trilogy. Just seemed ever so slightly off. Perhaps to much comedy? Perhaps it was a pretty thin plot? Perhaps it was how it was told? Perhaps it is all of those things combined. Just know I did not leave the theater loving it, or even really liking it for that matter. It may grow on me, this sometimes happens, but for now I am saying it is the weakest movie of the trilogy.

They shouldn't have changed directors...

  • Like 2

I pretty much exactly agree with spacer. Just wrote this on Facebook for someone asking what I thought...

So I am still not fully committed to this opinion, need a bit more time for it to fully sink in, but I believe this was my least favorite of the trilogy. Just seemed ever so slightly off. Perhaps to much comedy? Perhaps it was a pretty thin plot? Perhaps it was how it was told? Perhaps it is all of those things combined. Just know I did not leave the theater loving it, or even really liking it for that matter. It may grow on me, this sometimes happens, but for now I am saying it is the weakest movie of the trilogy.

I feel exactly the same thing.

I did not like how they interpreted The Mandarin tbh. It's just not right. I mean they didn't even mention the all powerful 10 Rings. The Mandarin is a huge foe for Iron Man in the Marvel universe. With them saying he's just a face.. that's like oh this Character really isn't important.The next thing that annoyed me was Iron Patriot wasn't really used for fighting. I still never saw Rodey suit up and fight along side Tony like in IM2. At least that's what I was expecting from the movie, because in IM2, it was pretty cool.

I kind of enjoyed it but I feel it is the weakest of the three movies :/

- Mandarin was wasted - all the trailers built up to him and then the reveal was terrible

- I didn't like how the movie was Stark telling his story to someone that didn't make sense because I didn't wait for the post-credits scene :/

- I am not familiar with Iron Man comics but him removing shrapnel in the end kind of ruins the whole Palladium part in IM2. I mean he could've just had it removed instead of building an entirely new material! (similar to the whole eagles mess in LOTR).

- That part with the kid was such a waste of time. :/ I am pretty sure it was to please the bean counters.

- Some weird product placements - Sun/Oracle and then FiOS in Tennessee - is it even available there?

I was surprised that the Mandarin turned out to be a persona but I don't think we should rule him out completely. I think it's possible that Ben Kingsley's character might return or we'll see the true Mandarin in the next Iron Man movie. It's also possible for Aldrich Killian to return as the Mandarin with new powers. After all, he survived the explosion of Tony's Mark 42 suit only to be taken out with a weaker explosion. Some people may not realize this but what this movie has done is establish the Mandarin's persona. Aldrich Killian may have claimed to be the Mandarin but we know that the title belongs to someone wielding 10 powerful rings. It could be him, again, with rings or it could be Ben's character tricking Tony (remember the line "you'll never see me coming").

I can understand why people are disappointed because of what we were lead to believe. The trailers and marketing did a great job at portraying Ben Kingsley's character as the Mandarin but we find out that he was simply an actor in the movie. I was disappointed too, at first, but I began to realize why Marvel did this. They couldn't jump straight into Iron Man fighting against the real Mandarin. It's too early for that. And they needed to portray Tony Stark as a regular human being (emotionally, not intellectually because he's far from normal in that aspect). He needed to fix his relationship with Pepper and move beyond the events of New York (in The Avengers). Now, he won't suffer from any more anxiety attacks and he's closer to Pepper.

Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Mandarin in Iron Man 4 or Iron Man 5. I also wouldn't be surprised to learn that the Mandarin will never return. It's entirely possible that the comic book version of the Mandarin was split into two characters: Ben's character and Aldrich Killian (minus the power rings). Killian represents the Mandarin's character with his thirst for power and hatred of Iron Man. And Ben's character represents the Mandarin's appearance and persona. Perhaps that's what Marvel truly wants and let's face it... the comic book version of the Mandarin is a little too stereotypical. I don't think a ring-wielding oriental man would've worked well in a live action movie.

They didn't show any rings in the movie because that would have made the Mandarin overpowered. However, they overcompensated by making the Extremis bad guys a little too powerful. Killian was able to slice and dice Tony's suits. And the suits use the same material as the one that Thor hit with his hammer multiple times.

Overall, I liked the movie and I consider it to be better than the second one but not as good as the first.

EDIT: Turns out it made $175.3 million over the weekend in North America alone. It's not as much as The Avengers ($207.4M) but it's more than The Dark Knight Rises ($160.9) and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 ($169.2M).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Good. I hope more people sue them for focusing on this worthless junk.
    • How about fire the guy who approved all the bad decisions? The guy who bought these studios in the first place? Oh wait, Satya is safe with his billions while the workers pay the price.
    • This had nothing to do with games. This is all about management wanting to squeeze as much money from Xbox to keep Microsoft's AI ambitions afloat. Someone has to make money to burn on AI.
    • GeekBook X16 Pro Intel Core Ultra 9 thin and light laptop gets a 17% discount by Steven Parker GEEKOM is back with a 17% discount on its top-of-the-range X16 Pro laptop. You may remember that we reviewed the X14 Pro back in February, which marked GEEKOM's debut into the ultrathin laptop segment. You can view the full specs below. GEEKOM X16 Pro Model NX14CM Dimensions 322.58 × 213.36 × 5.8 mm (12.7"L x 8.4"W x 0.23"T) Weight 997 g / 2.2 lbs Material Unibody Magnesium Alloy CPU Intel Ultra 5 125H (14C/18T, 24MB L3, 2.3-5.1 GHz, TDP 20W) Intel Ultra 9 185H (16C/22T, 24MB L3, 2.3-4.5 GHz, TDP 35W) Graphics Intel Arc graphics 8 Xe-cores @ 2350MHz 1024 shading units/stream processors (128 CUs), 8 Raytracing Cores, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs NPU Intel AI Boost, 11 TOPS / Up to 33 TOPS (CPU+NPU+GPU) Memory 32GB Dual-channel LPDDR5x 7467 MT/s Micron SODIMM Storage 1 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 4x4, Wodposit 1TB, 2 TB Display 16.0" IPS LCD, 2560 × 1600 (16:10) 100% sRGB, 120Hz Refresh Rate Camera 2MP 1080P 1 × Light sensor in camera module 1 × LED indicator in the camera module Windows Hello Support: No Mic 2 x Digital Mics integrated in the camera module Speakers 2 x 3813 (4Ω×2W) built in body Audio Codec: ALC269QN-VC3-GR Certificate: DTS: X Ultra Operating System Windows 11 Pro 25H2 Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 Wireless LAN MediaTek MT7922 M.2 Wi-Fi 6E LAN card Left I/O ports 1 x HDMI 2.0 2 x USB4 (40 Gbps) Right I/O ports 1 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A (5 Gbps) 1 x 3.5 mm Audio jack 1 x Camera Privacy Shutter Keyboard 78Key 1.2±0.2mm / Height 3.5±0.2mm (with backlight) White LED light in Caps Lock and Fn key Language: Default US Touch Pad Dimension: 120 x 71mm Material: Mylar Position: Middle Interface: I2C, Dualpoint button Dock Input port: 1 x Type-C 2 x USB 3.0, 1 x RJ45 1 x PD 1 x HDMI (Bio) Security Fingerprint sensor (in the power button) SD Card slot No Kensington Lock No Battery 77Wh (Input 20V, 3.25A) Power 65W PD GaN Fast Charge, USB-C to USB-C Warranty 2 years (Early Bird 1+1 Years) Deal price $1119.67 The X16 Pro is powered by the Intel Ultra 9 185H, which was released in Q4 2023 and is a 14th Gen Meteor Lake CPU designed for laptop/mobile using the Intel 4 architecture based on a 7nm process. The Ultra 9 185H features 16 cores and 22 threads running at up to 5.1 GHz. It also includes a dedicated NPU utilizing Intel AI Boost at 11 TOPS. On the graphics front, the 185H includes the still fairly capable ARC Graphics (not to be confused with the newer ARC 140T) integrated GPU with a max GPU frequency of 2350 MHz across 8 Xe-cores. It has been said that the iGPU is equivalent to the NVIDIA GeForce 3050 and GTX 1650 in gaming and synthetic benchmarks. Other highlights include an AMOLED display, LPDDR5x memory at 7467 MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and a fingerprint sensor built into the power button. AI PC? Although the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H includes a dedicated NPU, it's only 11 TOPS; therefore, it does not qualify as a Copilot+ PC. However, it can reach up to 33 TOPS with a combination of NPU, CPU, and GPU. As I said, although we only reviewed the X14 Pro, the unboxing is the same for the X16 Pro, which I noted in my review. The packaging is quite a nice experience. The outer box houses the X16 Pro box with a small compartment that contains the 5-in-1 Dock ($40 value), which appears to be an "Early Bird" inclusion. Upon removing the box cover, the X16 Pro is revealed sitting in a cardboard compartment with two small booklets of documentation. To the left of the X16 Pro are two cardboard compartments containing the 65W charger and Type-C USB cable. What’s In The Box 1 x GEEKOM X16 Pro Ultra-thin Laptop 1 x Type-C to Type-C cable 1.8M 1 x 65W GaN PD Fast Charger 1 x Warranty Card 1 x Thank You Card 1 x User Guide All products sold by GEEKOM receive a 3-year free Warranty from the date you receive the product. If needed, you can RMA or return locally relative to your region (the U.S. has a U.S. warehouse, mainland E.U. has a German warehouse). GEEKOM X16 Pro at GEEKOM U.S. for $1,119.67 was $1,349 (17% off) Use coupon code NWGBX1617 when checking out. This flash deal expires on July 2. Huge Summer Sale As a reminder, yesterday GEEKOM kicked off their Huge Summer Sale, in which there are deep discounts on a range of other GEEKOM products. From June 15 to June 30, the GEEKOM Official Store will be running its Summer Sale, with discounts starting from 15% off across the entire lineup, up to 50%! This is their biggest promotion of the year so far, offering pricing that is even lower than select Prime Day deals. You can check out the discounts at the dedicated Summer Sale landing pages below. GEEKOM U.S. Summer Sale GEEKOM U.K. Summer Sale While the Summer Sale ends on June 30, this deal will remain active until July 2.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!