Buy an Engagement Ring with a Joint account


Recommended Posts

I've been with my girlfriend just shy of 10 years (new years day). Obviously marriage or at least a proposal is just around the corner. Anyways, we moved in together, and in addition to my checking and savings accounts, we opened a joint account. This is primarily for the house and food, etc.

Anyways, we have been tinkering with the idea of buying her engagement ring using the joint account funds. I'm not quite sure if she is 100% serious, and i'm not 100% sure i feel ethically okay with it.

I'm just looking for some different points of view from you guys. What do you think?

I've been with my girlfriend just shy of 10 years (new years day). Obviously marriage or at least a proposal is just around the corner. Anyways, we moved in together, and in addition to my checking and savings accounts, we opened a joint account. This is primarily for the house and food, etc.

Anyways, we have been tinkering with the idea of buying her engagement ring using the joint account funds. I'm not quite sure if she is 100% serious, and i'm not 100% sure i feel ethically okay with it.

I'm just looking for some different points of view from you guys. What do you think?

Why are you making her pay anything towards the ring? :p It should be all from your own account.

Errr, I think you should make that particular purchase from your own account. Maybe I'm a bit old-fashioned, but I'd feel kind of weird going halfsies on that. Not exactly romantic :laugh:

Just my two cents, of course.

LOL... Are you serious? No offense, but I find this question too easily answerable.

Pay it your own 100%. ;)

Glassed Silver:mac

Me and my wife were together for almost 11 years before we got married. Long before that time did we start having "our" money and not our separate money. I personally think that separating the money is silly at that point. We still have our own chequing accounts but we keep them at the minimum required so we don't pay fees for transactions and the rest goes towards bills/mortgage and the left overs to our joint savings

She's probably serious and there is nothing wrong with that. Your money is her money and her money is your money.

Me and my wife were together for almost 11 years before we got married. Long before that time did we start having "our" money and not our separate money. I personally think that separating the money is silly at that point. We still have our own chequing accounts but we keep them at the minimum required so we don't pay fees for transactions and the rest goes towards bills/mortgage and the left overs to our joint savings

Exactly.

I haven't gotten married yet myself however my financial situation is very tightly tied with my girlfriend. We have several joint accounts and many things under both names; the house, the car etc... We don't look at assets separately but as joint a concern, obviously liabilities are the same. I do intend to marry one day but the cost of it will be paid for with our money, obviously.

How to propose, be it a surprise or otherwise, is another concern. One that is very tricky. I think women like to be able to be apart of that diamond hunting process and be able to have some input on what they will be wearing on their finger forever but at the same time they want to be surprised with a proposal too... its tough. I haven't figured that out yet.

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned, especially when you're both in on the engagement and not just you surprise asking.

If you want to sure, it consider what she wants to, she may not want youth pay it all. And besides you're a couple, evening you pay it 100% from your account, you're still effectively both paying for it.

  • Like 3

Being together that long, I think she is serious.. however I am with a few others.. I think you should pay the 100% of the engagement ring. That way she can't start a fight saying she had to buy her own ring ;)

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever. She is in control of the finances and if I need anything I ask her for it or for funds so I can get it. I can never buy her anything without her knowing.

I also bought her engagement ring out of "our funds" - I also paid for the wedding and the deposit on our house out of "our funds"

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever. She is in control of the finances and if I need anything I ask her for it or for funds so I can get it. I can never buy her anything without her knowing.

I also bought her engagement ring out of "our funds" - I also paid for the wedding and the deposit on our house out of "our funds"

It's a joint account, you're free to use that money just as she is. The problem isn't that you have a joint account but that you need to grow a pair and stop letting her control you like that

Being together that long, I think she is serious.. however I am with a few others.. I think you should pay the 100% of the engagement ring. That way she can't start a fight saying she had to buy her own ring ;)

This. If she pays anything for the ring, you will NEVER live it down. Any time something irks her, and you will hear, " Good thing I bought this ring.... " :p

It's a joint account, you're free to use that money just as she is. The problem isn't that you have a joint account but that you need to grow a pair and stop letting her control you like that

It's more to make sure the money is there to cover it,

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned, especially when you're both in on the engagement and not just you surprise asking.

the whole concept of buying a ****ing ring is old fashinoed... i
  • Like 1

the whole concept of buying a ****ing ring is old fashinoed... i

old fashioned != wrong

I'm sure you're doing lots of old fashioned things yourself.

Change for the sake of change?

It works without flowers, so why bother?

...

I don't mean to offend you, so read my words lightly and don't take the personal, but really: nothing's bad about being romantic.

You may disagree, but there are enough people who like it and don't embrace it for the sake of tradition, but because they agree with them, the tradition being no factor, but a state of what they like, not a denominator if you will.

SO many things are old fashioned, remember this. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 1

Well no matter how you look at it, if you are going to spend X on a ring, there is going to be an X shortfall whether from your account or the joint account, if you use your own account, X amount of income is going to be withheld from the joint account so that it can go into your own account. I don't know how closely she looks at the accounts but if she keeps an eye on it she is either going to notice a chunk of change missing from the account or that not as much is going in.

My suggestion would be to surprise her by making a personal loan from a close family member such as your parents who know that you will pay them back 100% right after you propose and will lend it to you interest free on that basis. Then you can turn your unsuspecting girlfriend into your unsuspecting fianc?e. They pay back the money since the surprise is over.

I recently proposed to my girlfriend of 9 years and I thought that was a long time. I gave her a cheap "commitment" ring at the time that I surprised her, and then we went to the Jeweller to design a ring together 'cause I couldn't work out what she would like without giving away the surprise that I was actually going through with it (after 9 years she wasn't taking the light talk of marriage/engagement seriously)

I bet she wants a big ass ring too. HA. my wife only wanted a tiny diamond. GOOD.

Just use the joint account since you been together so long. Its just one account now. Unless you been hiding some cash on the side account.

FYI diamond rings have horrible resale value. No matter what the jeweler tells you. Go back a year later and see if they will buy it back. Or go to a pawn shop. That 2000$ ring is now worth 250$ cash to you.

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned.

I sort of agree. It depends on the girl.

My girlfriend is at Uni. Although she has a job, that pays for her petrol and car. She occasionally pays for a takeaway. When we go out, she will insist on paying for some things because she feels bad I pay for everything. I can support us both on my salary. For instance on a week off from work this is how it panned out:

Trip to the Zoo - She paid, I drove.

Cinema - I paid for taxi, tickets. She paid for drinks.

Meal at Restaurant - I paid.

Trip to Aquarium - She paid, I drove.

The way we roll is that we don't count who pays for what. Although I bought her car for her and paid for her insurance, when we move in together she will be spending a few thousand pounds buying extra furniture we need.

If she suggested it, perhaps tell her you are okay to buy it from your own account. But if she insists then you may as well go half's on it. Perhaps suggest on buying the wedding ring yourself though. Then at least the one she will wear for the majority of her life will be the one you bought her as a gift. I will probably do this with my partner.

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever.

Then you need to get a new wife my friend :p

Although I don't have a joint account as yet, our wages will both go into our own accounts. Then a direct debit will transfer 3/4 or so into the joint account where wills and such will be paid from. This will leave me with some money for buying gifts and such.

I don't mean to offend you, so read my words lightly and don't take the personal, but really: nothing's bad about being romantic.

No, that guy should be offended and take it personally.

Being romantic is nice. So long as you don't make it cheesy. I love romancing my girlfriend, her reactions show me more love than most guys will ever feel.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!