Buy an Engagement Ring with a Joint account


Recommended Posts

I've been with my girlfriend just shy of 10 years (new years day). Obviously marriage or at least a proposal is just around the corner. Anyways, we moved in together, and in addition to my checking and savings accounts, we opened a joint account. This is primarily for the house and food, etc.

Anyways, we have been tinkering with the idea of buying her engagement ring using the joint account funds. I'm not quite sure if she is 100% serious, and i'm not 100% sure i feel ethically okay with it.

I'm just looking for some different points of view from you guys. What do you think?

I've been with my girlfriend just shy of 10 years (new years day). Obviously marriage or at least a proposal is just around the corner. Anyways, we moved in together, and in addition to my checking and savings accounts, we opened a joint account. This is primarily for the house and food, etc.

Anyways, we have been tinkering with the idea of buying her engagement ring using the joint account funds. I'm not quite sure if she is 100% serious, and i'm not 100% sure i feel ethically okay with it.

I'm just looking for some different points of view from you guys. What do you think?

Why are you making her pay anything towards the ring? :p It should be all from your own account.

Errr, I think you should make that particular purchase from your own account. Maybe I'm a bit old-fashioned, but I'd feel kind of weird going halfsies on that. Not exactly romantic :laugh:

Just my two cents, of course.

LOL... Are you serious? No offense, but I find this question too easily answerable.

Pay it your own 100%. ;)

Glassed Silver:mac

Me and my wife were together for almost 11 years before we got married. Long before that time did we start having "our" money and not our separate money. I personally think that separating the money is silly at that point. We still have our own chequing accounts but we keep them at the minimum required so we don't pay fees for transactions and the rest goes towards bills/mortgage and the left overs to our joint savings

She's probably serious and there is nothing wrong with that. Your money is her money and her money is your money.

Me and my wife were together for almost 11 years before we got married. Long before that time did we start having "our" money and not our separate money. I personally think that separating the money is silly at that point. We still have our own chequing accounts but we keep them at the minimum required so we don't pay fees for transactions and the rest goes towards bills/mortgage and the left overs to our joint savings

Exactly.

I haven't gotten married yet myself however my financial situation is very tightly tied with my girlfriend. We have several joint accounts and many things under both names; the house, the car etc... We don't look at assets separately but as joint a concern, obviously liabilities are the same. I do intend to marry one day but the cost of it will be paid for with our money, obviously.

How to propose, be it a surprise or otherwise, is another concern. One that is very tricky. I think women like to be able to be apart of that diamond hunting process and be able to have some input on what they will be wearing on their finger forever but at the same time they want to be surprised with a proposal too... its tough. I haven't figured that out yet.

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned, especially when you're both in on the engagement and not just you surprise asking.

If you want to sure, it consider what she wants to, she may not want youth pay it all. And besides you're a couple, evening you pay it 100% from your account, you're still effectively both paying for it.

  • Like 3

Being together that long, I think she is serious.. however I am with a few others.. I think you should pay the 100% of the engagement ring. That way she can't start a fight saying she had to buy her own ring ;)

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever. She is in control of the finances and if I need anything I ask her for it or for funds so I can get it. I can never buy her anything without her knowing.

I also bought her engagement ring out of "our funds" - I also paid for the wedding and the deposit on our house out of "our funds"

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever. She is in control of the finances and if I need anything I ask her for it or for funds so I can get it. I can never buy her anything without her knowing.

I also bought her engagement ring out of "our funds" - I also paid for the wedding and the deposit on our house out of "our funds"

It's a joint account, you're free to use that money just as she is. The problem isn't that you have a joint account but that you need to grow a pair and stop letting her control you like that

Being together that long, I think she is serious.. however I am with a few others.. I think you should pay the 100% of the engagement ring. That way she can't start a fight saying she had to buy her own ring ;)

This. If she pays anything for the ring, you will NEVER live it down. Any time something irks her, and you will hear, " Good thing I bought this ring.... " :p

It's a joint account, you're free to use that money just as she is. The problem isn't that you have a joint account but that you need to grow a pair and stop letting her control you like that

It's more to make sure the money is there to cover it,

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned, especially when you're both in on the engagement and not just you surprise asking.

the whole concept of buying a ****ing ring is old fashinoed... i
  • Like 1

the whole concept of buying a ****ing ring is old fashinoed... i

old fashioned != wrong

I'm sure you're doing lots of old fashioned things yourself.

Change for the sake of change?

It works without flowers, so why bother?

...

I don't mean to offend you, so read my words lightly and don't take the personal, but really: nothing's bad about being romantic.

You may disagree, but there are enough people who like it and don't embrace it for the sake of tradition, but because they agree with them, the tradition being no factor, but a state of what they like, not a denominator if you will.

SO many things are old fashioned, remember this. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 1

Well no matter how you look at it, if you are going to spend X on a ring, there is going to be an X shortfall whether from your account or the joint account, if you use your own account, X amount of income is going to be withheld from the joint account so that it can go into your own account. I don't know how closely she looks at the accounts but if she keeps an eye on it she is either going to notice a chunk of change missing from the account or that not as much is going in.

My suggestion would be to surprise her by making a personal loan from a close family member such as your parents who know that you will pay them back 100% right after you propose and will lend it to you interest free on that basis. Then you can turn your unsuspecting girlfriend into your unsuspecting fianc?e. They pay back the money since the surprise is over.

I recently proposed to my girlfriend of 9 years and I thought that was a long time. I gave her a cheap "commitment" ring at the time that I surprised her, and then we went to the Jeweller to design a ring together 'cause I couldn't work out what she would like without giving away the surprise that I was actually going through with it (after 9 years she wasn't taking the light talk of marriage/engagement seriously)

I bet she wants a big ass ring too. HA. my wife only wanted a tiny diamond. GOOD.

Just use the joint account since you been together so long. Its just one account now. Unless you been hiding some cash on the side account.

FYI diamond rings have horrible resale value. No matter what the jeweler tells you. Go back a year later and see if they will buy it back. Or go to a pawn shop. That 2000$ ring is now worth 250$ cash to you.

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned.

I sort of agree. It depends on the girl.

My girlfriend is at Uni. Although she has a job, that pays for her petrol and car. She occasionally pays for a takeaway. When we go out, she will insist on paying for some things because she feels bad I pay for everything. I can support us both on my salary. For instance on a week off from work this is how it panned out:

Trip to the Zoo - She paid, I drove.

Cinema - I paid for taxi, tickets. She paid for drinks.

Meal at Restaurant - I paid.

Trip to Aquarium - She paid, I drove.

The way we roll is that we don't count who pays for what. Although I bought her car for her and paid for her insurance, when we move in together she will be spending a few thousand pounds buying extra furniture we need.

If she suggested it, perhaps tell her you are okay to buy it from your own account. But if she insists then you may as well go half's on it. Perhaps suggest on buying the wedding ring yourself though. Then at least the one she will wear for the majority of her life will be the one you bought her as a gift. I will probably do this with my partner.

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever.

Then you need to get a new wife my friend :p

Although I don't have a joint account as yet, our wages will both go into our own accounts. Then a direct debit will transfer 3/4 or so into the joint account where wills and such will be paid from. This will leave me with some money for buying gifts and such.

I don't mean to offend you, so read my words lightly and don't take the personal, but really: nothing's bad about being romantic.

No, that guy should be offended and take it personally.

Being romantic is nice. So long as you don't make it cheesy. I love romancing my girlfriend, her reactions show me more love than most guys will ever feel.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
    • I did test it a month or so back, but ... the results I expect to be on the first page are not there.
    • Neowin is saying these are good prices? Thats crazy. As others have said they are just ######. Time for big tech to bring down the prices for real not this fake crap.
    • The iFlyTek AINote 2 is among the thinnest E-Ink tablets. It has an EMR stylus, a built-in fingerprint reader, and plenty of built-in AI features. You had me until "and plenty of built-in AI features." That and any company that still does the iProduct naming trope is an immediate pass. It suggests the company isn't very imaginative or creative and is trying to piggyback off another company's success. Extremely lame. Also kind of expensive. Better choices at lower prices out there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!