Buy an Engagement Ring with a Joint account


Recommended Posts

I've been with my girlfriend just shy of 10 years (new years day). Obviously marriage or at least a proposal is just around the corner. Anyways, we moved in together, and in addition to my checking and savings accounts, we opened a joint account. This is primarily for the house and food, etc.

Anyways, we have been tinkering with the idea of buying her engagement ring using the joint account funds. I'm not quite sure if she is 100% serious, and i'm not 100% sure i feel ethically okay with it.

I'm just looking for some different points of view from you guys. What do you think?

I've been with my girlfriend just shy of 10 years (new years day). Obviously marriage or at least a proposal is just around the corner. Anyways, we moved in together, and in addition to my checking and savings accounts, we opened a joint account. This is primarily for the house and food, etc.

Anyways, we have been tinkering with the idea of buying her engagement ring using the joint account funds. I'm not quite sure if she is 100% serious, and i'm not 100% sure i feel ethically okay with it.

I'm just looking for some different points of view from you guys. What do you think?

Why are you making her pay anything towards the ring? :p It should be all from your own account.

Errr, I think you should make that particular purchase from your own account. Maybe I'm a bit old-fashioned, but I'd feel kind of weird going halfsies on that. Not exactly romantic :laugh:

Just my two cents, of course.

LOL... Are you serious? No offense, but I find this question too easily answerable.

Pay it your own 100%. ;)

Glassed Silver:mac

Me and my wife were together for almost 11 years before we got married. Long before that time did we start having "our" money and not our separate money. I personally think that separating the money is silly at that point. We still have our own chequing accounts but we keep them at the minimum required so we don't pay fees for transactions and the rest goes towards bills/mortgage and the left overs to our joint savings

She's probably serious and there is nothing wrong with that. Your money is her money and her money is your money.

Me and my wife were together for almost 11 years before we got married. Long before that time did we start having "our" money and not our separate money. I personally think that separating the money is silly at that point. We still have our own chequing accounts but we keep them at the minimum required so we don't pay fees for transactions and the rest goes towards bills/mortgage and the left overs to our joint savings

Exactly.

I haven't gotten married yet myself however my financial situation is very tightly tied with my girlfriend. We have several joint accounts and many things under both names; the house, the car etc... We don't look at assets separately but as joint a concern, obviously liabilities are the same. I do intend to marry one day but the cost of it will be paid for with our money, obviously.

How to propose, be it a surprise or otherwise, is another concern. One that is very tricky. I think women like to be able to be apart of that diamond hunting process and be able to have some input on what they will be wearing on their finger forever but at the same time they want to be surprised with a proposal too... its tough. I haven't figured that out yet.

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned, especially when you're both in on the engagement and not just you surprise asking.

If you want to sure, it consider what she wants to, she may not want youth pay it all. And besides you're a couple, evening you pay it 100% from your account, you're still effectively both paying for it.

  • Like 3

Being together that long, I think she is serious.. however I am with a few others.. I think you should pay the 100% of the engagement ring. That way she can't start a fight saying she had to buy her own ring ;)

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever. She is in control of the finances and if I need anything I ask her for it or for funds so I can get it. I can never buy her anything without her knowing.

I also bought her engagement ring out of "our funds" - I also paid for the wedding and the deposit on our house out of "our funds"

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever. She is in control of the finances and if I need anything I ask her for it or for funds so I can get it. I can never buy her anything without her knowing.

I also bought her engagement ring out of "our funds" - I also paid for the wedding and the deposit on our house out of "our funds"

It's a joint account, you're free to use that money just as she is. The problem isn't that you have a joint account but that you need to grow a pair and stop letting her control you like that

Being together that long, I think she is serious.. however I am with a few others.. I think you should pay the 100% of the engagement ring. That way she can't start a fight saying she had to buy her own ring ;)

This. If she pays anything for the ring, you will NEVER live it down. Any time something irks her, and you will hear, " Good thing I bought this ring.... " :p

It's a joint account, you're free to use that money just as she is. The problem isn't that you have a joint account but that you need to grow a pair and stop letting her control you like that

It's more to make sure the money is there to cover it,

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned, especially when you're both in on the engagement and not just you surprise asking.

the whole concept of buying a ****ing ring is old fashinoed... i
  • Like 1

the whole concept of buying a ****ing ring is old fashinoed... i

old fashioned != wrong

I'm sure you're doing lots of old fashioned things yourself.

Change for the sake of change?

It works without flowers, so why bother?

...

I don't mean to offend you, so read my words lightly and don't take the personal, but really: nothing's bad about being romantic.

You may disagree, but there are enough people who like it and don't embrace it for the sake of tradition, but because they agree with them, the tradition being no factor, but a state of what they like, not a denominator if you will.

SO many things are old fashioned, remember this. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 1

Well no matter how you look at it, if you are going to spend X on a ring, there is going to be an X shortfall whether from your account or the joint account, if you use your own account, X amount of income is going to be withheld from the joint account so that it can go into your own account. I don't know how closely she looks at the accounts but if she keeps an eye on it she is either going to notice a chunk of change missing from the account or that not as much is going in.

My suggestion would be to surprise her by making a personal loan from a close family member such as your parents who know that you will pay them back 100% right after you propose and will lend it to you interest free on that basis. Then you can turn your unsuspecting girlfriend into your unsuspecting fianc?e. They pay back the money since the surprise is over.

I recently proposed to my girlfriend of 9 years and I thought that was a long time. I gave her a cheap "commitment" ring at the time that I surprised her, and then we went to the Jeweller to design a ring together 'cause I couldn't work out what she would like without giving away the surprise that I was actually going through with it (after 9 years she wasn't taking the light talk of marriage/engagement seriously)

I bet she wants a big ass ring too. HA. my wife only wanted a tiny diamond. GOOD.

Just use the joint account since you been together so long. Its just one account now. Unless you been hiding some cash on the side account.

FYI diamond rings have horrible resale value. No matter what the jeweler tells you. Go back a year later and see if they will buy it back. Or go to a pawn shop. That 2000$ ring is now worth 250$ cash to you.

If she's ok with it, why not. The whole guy paying for everything is a bit old fashioned.

I sort of agree. It depends on the girl.

My girlfriend is at Uni. Although she has a job, that pays for her petrol and car. She occasionally pays for a takeaway. When we go out, she will insist on paying for some things because she feels bad I pay for everything. I can support us both on my salary. For instance on a week off from work this is how it panned out:

Trip to the Zoo - She paid, I drove.

Cinema - I paid for taxi, tickets. She paid for drinks.

Meal at Restaurant - I paid.

Trip to Aquarium - She paid, I drove.

The way we roll is that we don't count who pays for what. Although I bought her car for her and paid for her insurance, when we move in together she will be spending a few thousand pounds buying extra furniture we need.

If she suggested it, perhaps tell her you are okay to buy it from your own account. But if she insists then you may as well go half's on it. Perhaps suggest on buying the wedding ring yourself though. Then at least the one she will wear for the majority of her life will be the one you bought her as a gift. I will probably do this with my partner.

Me and my wife had a joint account from the beginning to make bill paying easier as no matter who had what money the bills still needed to be paid. 11 years later I regret this somewhat as I have no money to myself ever.

Then you need to get a new wife my friend :p

Although I don't have a joint account as yet, our wages will both go into our own accounts. Then a direct debit will transfer 3/4 or so into the joint account where wills and such will be paid from. This will leave me with some money for buying gifts and such.

I don't mean to offend you, so read my words lightly and don't take the personal, but really: nothing's bad about being romantic.

No, that guy should be offended and take it personally.

Being romantic is nice. So long as you don't make it cheesy. I love romancing my girlfriend, her reactions show me more love than most guys will ever feel.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!