Recommended Posts

I am leaning towards FVS336G, has anyone got suggestions/experience with these units.

For almost all of these dual wan routers, the reviews are grim, this is probably the only one with decent reviews.

I looked at Linksys, Ciscos, even Sonicwalls..

We are moving our offices to a new location and we will be getting two ISPs.

My set up will be ISP Router 1 and ISP Router 2 to FVS336G to JGS516 16 Port Switch to each workstation, plus I am planning to buy two access points for two ends of the office for wireless users. (Unless I can salvage some old Linksys WRT routers to act as access point, but I don't want laptop users to have problems accessing local network)

Suggestions & comments are appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071819-dual-wan-router-setup/
Share on other sites

What size office? What type of connections? is this for redundancy or another reason?

My order of preference of Dual WAN:

1. Most Billion ADSL2+ routers offer Dual-WAN (one 10/100/1000 switch port becomes a WAN port) for fallover between 10/100/1000 and ADSL, I find their units quite reliable and affordable for small business, if at lease one of these connections is ADSL. Pretty customisable with VLANs and so on for a SMB product.

2. OpenWRT routers, most can configure a switch port to WAN, similar to the Billion, but even more customisable in the same small footprint

3. A dedicated machine with multiple network interfaces running as a Linux Router, possibly pfSense would be the best bet.

4. Cisco gear

Look a the Zyxel USG 50 (or a 200/300 depending on your size), or if you have a bit more cash a Cisco 1841.

Either will allow you to do dual WAN of any connection type - just plug in modems/WICs as required for you WAN type.

The USG is a breze to setup and does SSL+IPSec VPNs, LoadBalancing, Content filtering etc

The Cicso is more complex, but it is Cisco grade kit....

I purchased a FVS336G back in 2008. I used it for 1 month before removing it as it caused more trouble than it was worth. At the time the firmware was very buggy and firewall never worked properly. I've still got it sitting as a paper weight, but reading this has sort of given me an idea to try it out again, perhaps if there is new firmware too. Then again it is quite old...

I tried it the failover function which worked as stated, but it took too long to switch over. Also navigating the GUI was slow and sometimes it would crash if you navigated too fast. I also tried to split traffic, so HTTP via WAN1 and FTP via WAN2, work quite well actually. And from memory, setting up firewall rules were flakey and I never really undestood the logic behind it.

I'm also planning on setting up an office w/ dual WAN in the next month or so (in NY too coincidently), though I'm only looking to do WAN failover/failback. At the moment was probably going to get a Sonicwall & possibly pair it with a CradlePoint CBR450 to bridge a 3G/4G connection into it for failover. (Sonicwall does support some 3G/4G but it's a bit limited compared to CradlePoint's offering)

In the past I used Snapgear routers for dual WAN & they worked great. Of course later on McAfee bought them out & then killed off the entire product line, so it's not really an option anymore.

Not so sure on Netgear, haven't really liked their other stuff.

I'd be curious what you end up going with!

Simon, the setup is 15 workstations, about 4-5 connected devices, one network printer

using 2 Channel T1 (3mbps/3mbps) running on a single WAN from ISP's router + DSL or Cable Connection at 10 to 15mbps down, probably 1-2mbps/up (waiting for this to be installed this week).

I thought I hit jackpot with Netgear FVS336G since it seemed like a perfect device...

Since this is for an office environment, I am going to need something reliable. I already have a DD-WRT router (an Asus router) but there wasn't an easy way to just switch it to a dual WAN setup. There are bunch of scripts to run, and to make changes we need to go back to scripts again. Maybe it is better in newer firmwares.

S.P, It looks like there are few versions of FVS336G. Gv1 and Gv2 http://support.netgear.com/app/products/family/a_id/13333

Amazon lists two different ones see below. One has worse reviews than other, I am not sure if there is a difference in hardware or firmware. You can try the newer firmware, some amazon reviews state that problems were resolved with newer firmware. But even a newer firmware will not fix hardware issues, if there is any.

Lars77,

I have been reading about and getting suggestions from few others to take a look at Peplink devices. Peplink 20 seem to be a good alternative (Pep 30 adds a 3rd WAN port)

ZyXEL ZyWALL USG50 - $234

Peplink 20 - $287

Netgear FVS336G-200NAS - $218

Netgear FVS336G-100NAS - $332

I'm using Mikrotik routerboards for my Multi-Wan setups.

For instance at home I have 2 DSL Isps at the moment, I tend to send traffic from my own machines onto 1 ISP and the the other traffic onto the other. But it can do Nth packet routing and such if you wished to load balance.

It's also possible to combine VPN tunneling and a remote server to Bond connections, but it tends to work best if each connection has simular speeds and latency, I wouldn't recommend it with 2 connection that had different latency as jittter will be a problem.

If you want to go down the pfSense route then depending on the kind of throughput you need something like a pcengines Alix might help if you don't want to run a full on PC.

Barracuda is very expensive, and the routerboards would mean another workstation, dedicated only for this purpose, and I am afraid would be less reliable. So workstation may not even work, it would probably need to be a server or PC with additional fans.

I am leaning towards peplink after reading more about it, it may even come with a gigabit LAN port if the reviews are accurate. Even if not, Gigabit switch will be enough.

The only thing that is worrying me is that web blocking is grayed out from the features in Peplink.

I am loking for something that has a straight forward and easy configuration. I read about Zywall USG50, and multiple reviews mentioned difficult management & configuration. This is the reason I passed on Sonicwall. I am not sure what part of the configuration is difficult, but if the simple options are easy to access, I can still consider it.

I am loking for something that has a straight forward and easy configuration. I read about Zywall USG50, and multiple reviews mentioned difficult management & configuration. This is the reason I passed on Sonicwall. I am not sure what part of the configuration is difficult, but if the simple options are easy to access, I can still consider it.

I find the USG one of the easiest devices to setup + the documentation is good.

I'm not quite sure where the reviewers have a problem

But then I have setup a few....

  • 6 months later...

Hi everyone, moving took forever, getting our first ISP, and then finally TWC installing our cable connection and we ordered ZyWall USG50 which is expected to arrive tomorrow. I will try setting it up tomorrow and report back. Thanks for all the suggestions.

PS: Broadview Networks service in New York City is terrible, avoid them if you can. Really not worth the cost they are charging.

  • 4 months later...

I find the USG one of the easiest devices to setup + the documentation is good.

I'm not quite sure where the reviewers have a problem

But then I have setup a few....

We bought USG50 and it is working very well, solid, not a lot of drops, and combines bandwith down (up, not so much, but it may be due to policies).

The only problem with USG50 is the VPN, it is very painful to setup VPN on this device, unless you pay for VPN client, even then it is still difficult.

Also firewall is extremely advenced with no way to make it "easy" but I guess it is a good thing for those who want complete control over their rules and setup.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!