Recommended Posts

Hello chaps,

Hopefully you can help me here :)

I've got myself a dedicated Win Server 2008 box running my web server and SQL server for my forum (Got it nice and cheap considering the specs ;)).

Anyway, I also have another dedicated Win Server 2003 box sat idling that i'm paying for, that i'd like to utilize.

Both boxes are in different locations, but I would like to share the load between the 2 - So if one goes offline, the other box can take the load.

A duplication, but with different OS's. This must be possible, but whats the best way of going about this ?

I would like to have the Win Server 2008 box take 90% (atleast) of the load if possible as it has far high specs and a better pipe to it. With the secondary server just taking the lightest load possible.

Thanks,

Ferret !

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1073859-web-servermysql-load-balancing/
Share on other sites

An easy simple way but not resilient to outages or necessarily fully balanced would be to just use DNS.

Configure the entire site on both servers and put in entries for your domain containing the public IPs of both Hosted servers.

This way traffic would round robin between the (2) servers based solely on whichever IP is served first to the client. However, when one goes down a user might inadvertantly be sent to the server that's down on their 1st attempt. Not ideal but it would make both servers be utilized but not at the 90% / 10% ratio that you desire.

You would need to work out a way to keep the database data in sync between the (2) mysql instances.

If they're in different locations, how are you sharing SQL access? Are you pointing them at the same physical server, or are you doing replication or such over the net?

If they were in the same location you could use something like nginx to proxy access to the servers (And have it serve static content, leaving the main servers to handle dynamic content)

If they're in different locations, how are you sharing SQL access? Are you pointing them at the same physical server, or are you doing replication or such over the net?

I'm going for replication over the net for the SQL.

What I might try is what pupdawg21 suggested. It's not the ideal situation is I was hoping for, but it's better than nothing :)

Thanks chaps.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This article does not make sense and it’s very evident, the bug wasn’t confirmed to exist, because the application itself runs on editions of Windows which make it impossible to run Hyper-V VMs on, “Basically, Claude Desktop on Windows spins up a 1.8GB Hyper-V virtual machine if you use Claude Cowork or agent mode even once.”, suggests the bug is caused by something else otherwise it would only happen to users with the capability of running Hyper-V VMs and that’s only if Hyper-V was enabled which is by default not enabled. The true issue is that the author who reported the bug used the incorrect terminology.
    • “To prevent hallucination issues and keep the database clean, the platform uses a multi-agent verification loop to check code quality.” - This absolutely isn’t happening. ”Before the massive rise of LLMs, which tanked its traffic by about 50% over the last couple of years, Stack Overflow was the go-to website for millions of programmers seeking coding solutions.” - It still is trusted, because the community of users, blocked other users from submitting false and misleading answers generated by AI agents that can be convinced something it generated is actually incorrect even if it’s actually correct. The company itself doesn’t know what it wants to be so it keeps trying and failing to introduce AI features to the platform. This effort will also fail, already submitted one successful poison pill, look forward to generating more.
    • Faster? MBP M5 Max, I have 4k video renders running faster than Teams.
    • Completely irrelevant as long as pricing is garbage. With OneDrive I get storage for about $18 / TB for a year. With Proton it's $96. For the record, Google One is around $48, Dropbox $69, iCloud $60. In other words, Proton is the worst value BY FAR. Not to mention with OneDrive I get full desktop and web office suites for 6 people.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!