Like to Post Ratio - What's your score?

By RiverCampher
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Experienced

RiverCampher

Posted
Posted

I just thought this would be a good way to analyze your contributions to Neowin.

Do you post intelligent banter, funny things or just waffle ;)

Here is a simple calc:

Divide total likes with total amount of posts and times that number by 100 to get your score. Higher the better (e.g. the more content is liked per post).

E.g. mine is 29 / 734 X 100 = a score of 3.95! Guess I'm a waffler ;)

Who is highest??? (pray it's not WarWagon!)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1073867-like-to-post-ratio-whats-your-score/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

remixedcat

Posted
Posted

The system has changed from one of the prev. versions of IPB. However some has carried over. This includes neg reps as well, as this forum used to have that....

Grand Master

Vice

Posted
Posted

I've been here since 2004. Most of my post (about 80% of them) were made before people could like posts.

So if we take 20% of my post count (2,937) and do the calculation: 737 / 2,937 * 100 = 25.09

I know this is about accurate too because Phouchg has 2,291 posts and his profile says he posts 5.74 posts per day. I have 14,684 but with 5.25 posts per day. So I'd say the amount of posts I have selected (20% or 2,937 posts) would be accurate for the amount of time the Like system has been around. I know that I have one of the highest like scores on the site. Higher than Rappy or Neobond even.

I don't think it really means that much. But it is nice to know that my contributions to the forum have been worthwhile for other users and not a waste of anyone's time reading them or me writing them. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27

      By Copernic · Posted

      TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • Neowin's 2026 GNU/Linux Desktop Thread

      By remixedcat · Posted

      My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • ABSTRACT//AWESOME//WALLPAPERS - made by me!

      By remixedcat · Posted

      thank you!
    • Apple and Tesla Supplier Tata Electronics Confirms 630 GB Data Theft: iPhone Specs on Dark Web

      By +Nik Louch · Posted

      Ooopsie!
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!