Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to purchase a router with a very strong range. For some reason, despite forking out reasonable money (?50-ish) for a router previously, I'm still struggling to get a decent signal in all areas of the house despite the fact that it's a small 3-bedroom council maisonette with plaster walls. Why... I really can't figure out.

SO! I'm looking at getting a new router, but I really don't fancy being burned again by a router again with signal strength that won't even cover my whole house. Preferably this router would have USB mass storage over network capabilities (although not needed) and external antennas?

I'm not really what you would define as a "power user" when it comes to networking - so things like Tomato support, DHCP customisation, heavy QoS and traffic shaping, etc, aren't really a necessity for me. Of course, if it supports these, I won't complain! On the flipside, I'm not afraid to get my hands a little dirty when setting up my router either - so while hand-holding installations are nice they're not a necessity for me.

As long as the router has a high LOS, 300N, the ability to change channels/switch to auto, and doesn't look like a 90s switch box, it's good for me :) My budget is ?100, although if we can keep it below ?75 that'd be best.

Thanks guys :)

NETGEAR WNDR4500 is without a doubt the best consumer router currently available. Not sure what it costs in the UK, but here in the US it is $178.

If not too pricey for you in UK I can defo recommend it. Check out the Newegg reviews too. Excellent router.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122435&Tpk=wndr4500

Are you sure it is the router and not the device's WiFi capabilities?? Have you tried accessing the same router with other devices?

100% the router.

Tried it with my DS, 3DS, PSP, HTC Desire, HTC Mozart, Lumia 800, an iPhone 3GS and a 4S and 3 laptops (not all mine!). I always get the same issue in the same parts of the house, pretty much. Wavers ever so slightly, but on the whole it always throws a wobbly in the same parts of the house, so yeah, I'd say it's the router. All those devices can't be wrong, surely?

Squuiid: I'll check out that router, thanks!

Multiple cheap routers and cascade them or WDS them (for a completely terrible speed)

One will not do it and will be a serious waste of money.

the airport extreme and the airport express systems do this - if you can deal with apple. Other than that, get some DD-WRT compatible routers and set them up to distribute the wifi quite easily. Not sure how the iptables will need to be modified to allow traffic from any router to see any other router in the system.

Also the WNDR4500 is a very good router, I just upgraded my 310N to this model and even running the stock firmware I am satisifed. But, for WIRELESS, the 3700 is actually much better! (read around) The 4500 advantage is that I switched everything over to 5GHz, which provides increased range (higher freq = smaller wave) and it allows 40MHz bandwidth rather than 2.4GHz's 20MHz bandwidth. so on a 300Mbps connection with 2.4GHz I get around 7-9MB/s and on 5GHz I get around 15MB/s

I would just get 2 or 3 linksys 4200, flash with DD-WRT, add some active cooling (as they get hot and problematic! Same chipset as the wndr4500 actually) and throw one upstairs and one downstairs as 2 separate wifi points, then allow the wifi system to choose which one it wants to access. (configure both points in all wifi devices and they'll configure auto)

Also - theres no interference? microwaves, cordless phones, scanners, walkie-talkies, or anything else using the band? again the 'manual channel' forcing would avoid this interference.

100% the router.

Tried it with my DS, 3DS, PSP, HTC Desire, HTC Mozart, Lumia 800, an iPhone 3GS and a 4S and 3 laptops (not all mine!). I always get the same issue in the same parts of the house, pretty much. Wavers ever so slightly, but on the whole it always throws a wobbly in the same parts of the house, so yeah, I'd say it's the router. All those devices can't be wrong, surely?

Squuiid: I'll check out that router, thanks!

They are known as deadspots. Despite how much power you emit, its likley the waves will propagate the same way and still be horrible.

try some different channels - force your router to go to channel 1.. then test. switch to 2. unplug and plug back in (so devices reinitialize new channel) and test again.. keep going. each channel is separated by a few MHz so they will propigate differently. Ensure you test other areas too as it may fix area 1 but create a new problem in area 2.

5GHz signal maybe your best bet if you want one device - but your devices list, I think the 4s is the only one which can actually do 5GHz wifi... I know the ds, psp, desire, 3gs and probably the laptops (depending) won't.

Multiple cheap routers and cascade them or WDS them (for a completely terrible speed)

One will not do it and will be a serious waste of money.

the airport extreme and the airport express systems do this - if you can deal with apple. Other than that, get some DD-WRT compatible routers and set them up to distribute the wifi quite easily. Not sure how the iptables will need to be modified to allow traffic from any router to see any other router in the system.

Also the WNDR4500 is a very good router, I just upgraded my 310N to this model and even running the stock firmware I am satisifed. But, for WIRELESS, the 3700 is actually much better! (read around)

I would just get 2 or 3 linksys 4200, flash with DD-WRT, add some active cooling (as they get hot and problematic! Same chipset as the wndr4500 actually) and throw one upstairs and one downstairs as 2 separate wifi points, then allow the wifi system to choose which one it wants to access.

Am I able to setup the second 4200 as a Wi-Fi repeater or would it have to be it's own thing? The reason being is cabling... having to drill a hole in the floor/ceiling to get a network cable down would be a ******. I could use powerline adapter, but surely that's just asking for trouble?

They are known as deadspots. Despite how much power you emit, its likley the waves will propagate the same way and still be horrible.

try some different channels - force your router to go to channel 1.. then test. switch to 2. unplug and plug back in (so devices reinitialize new channel) and test again.. keep going. each channel is separated by a few MHz so they will propigate differently. Ensure you test other areas too as it may fix area 1 but create a new problem in area 2.

5GHz signal maybe your best bet if you want one device - but your devices list, I think the 4s is the only one which can actually do 5GHz wifi... I know the ds, psp, desire, 3gs and probably the laptops (depending) won't.

Ah, I didn't think of that. The DS and PSP don't get any online loving anymore, the 3DS is usually used in the good zones, the Desire I no longer own and the iPhones aren't even mine. These would be for my Lumia, the laptop and other future devices I might own. That's a great suggestion though, I might force different channels through and see how that works.

Just a thought though - would my microwave cause any issues, even when it's not in use? Just a random thought that's popped into my head.

Actually the new Netgear R6300 Dual Band Gigabit WiFi Router is now the premium router based on the new AC standard (supports previous N, etc).

Yes, you need the clients to support the standard but it gives far better throughput and increased range so a better buy in the long term.

Actually the new Netgear R6300 Dual Band Gigabit WiFi Router is now the premium router based on the new AC standard (supports previous N, etc).

Yes, you need the clients to support the standard but it gives far better throughput and increased range so a better buy in the long term.

This isn't out yet.

Multiple cheap routers and cascade them or WDS them (for a completely terrible speed)

One will not do it and will be a serious waste of money.

the airport extreme and the airport express systems do this - if you can deal with apple. Other than that, get some DD-WRT compatible routers and set them up to distribute the wifi quite easily. Not sure how the iptables will need to be modified to allow traffic from any router to see any other router in the system.

Also the WNDR4500 is a very good router, I just upgraded my 310N to this model and even running the stock firmware I am satisifed. But, for WIRELESS, the 3700 is actually much better! (read around) The 4500 advantage is that I switched everything over to 5GHz, which provides increased range (higher freq = smaller wave)

You are mistaken. 5GHz has far less range than 2.4GHz.

This is VERY true. the 5GHz on my netgear has better range as my 2.4GHz linksys did, but the linksys was single-band and the netgear is dual or tri band - (more ways to connect and less multipath echos) Higher freq = smaller wave = less propagation.

So, speaking strictly range, your BEST bet is to get a 802.11b router in 1-2MB/s mode, as it will give the MAXIMUM range possible as it has the largest wavelength. http://www.medicalel...medical-devices paragraph below fig 1. specifically states this. All in all this is a good read too.

Im thinking that multipath is the problem in the OP setup, and signal propagation is more of an issue than actual coverage.. 5GHz will not (likely) remedy this problem. It will only fix interference issues and allow double the throughput.

Maybe go buy $600 worth of routers (dlink, netgear and linksys) and test them for the 14 days or whatever the return policy is.. see which works better and return the other 2.

http://www.ko4bb.com..._2_and_5GHz.pdf

this is a good PDF, they test propagation through things and plot it. like blinds, carpet, glass, brick, water, nearly everything. In the abstract they derive -6.8dB is mathematically calculated gain from a jump of 2.4 to 5GHz (in laymens terms, if 2.4GHz is 100% strength you'd get 25% strength with 5GHz, as every 3dB loss is halfing the power)

Now - according to their tests, the experienced loss is about equal on both bands.... This means the propagation loss experienced is the same, so signal range would be about the same. Maybe the linksys isn't all that bad afterall.

OP: Kinda went on a tangent but out of this, if there is a lot of full water piping running between floors - 2.4GHz will be severely affected. This is also why microwaves use this frequency, as it excites water and heats up our food (and also explains why things without water in them won't heat right)

I doubt you have the gear to test how well signals propagate, so i'd just try routers and if they don't work or you don't like, return them until you either proved the top of the line ones aren't any better than what you got or you found one that works. FWIW, find one you like, return it, then order for likely cheaper online.

Asus RT-N56U.

I pull up in my car outside the house and get a signal before I even get out. There's a long garden between the car park and my house too.

The range is phenomenal.

?100 but well worth it and it looks great :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!