Recommended Posts

Hello Neowin!

I have not upgraded my computer for 7 years... needless to say the games I (can) play are on the lowest settings and still cry in pain (League of Legends runs at 06-12 fps).

I am seeking a critic of the build I currently have in mind - please feel free to point out mistakes, bottlenecks, inconsistencies, etc.

I intend to use this the computer for gaming (a reasonable frame rate/settings on current games) and general use (web, video, documents, photo editing). I am not "loyal" to any specific brand, BUT I would prefer to stay with Intel for the CPU. By the way, Diablo 3 comes out in 11 days!

Link to current build: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/7Lqm

graphics card is defo a little on the weak side, get a 6870 or 6950 if you want to reduce costs rather than go for one of the 28nm cards. The 6850 won't give you the wow performance i'm sure you'd like after seven years of staying with the same PC!

you don't need anywhere near 16gb of ram for gaming... you'll seriously struggle to use 8gb under that kind of usage. aside from that, everything else is great. maybe a better graphics hard such as a 7850 or a 560ti would be better considering you plan on doing a lot of gaming.

Thanks for all the input!

I'd snag a 128gb SSD also for that build. It's night and day with one.

I planned to add in a SSD drive later on once I have the other parts - I just see it mainly as a luxury over the other parts. And I have heard of SSD having a lot of issues with longevity in performance (slowing down, becoming faulty, etc). But I have my eye on the Crucial M4!

have you considered Intel i7-3770S + SSD (as main drive) Cooler , quiter and faster! plus better longevity and you are golden for the rest :)

I had considered the new Intel line, but as far as I know it hasn't improved a whole lot for gaming (I don't need the integrated gpu), and Ivy Bridge doesn't overclock as well/as easily as Sandy Bridge does - which I plan to do. But maybe I haven't done enough research on it. Does the 3rd gen really offer the gamer an incentive? I keep reading conflicting views on that, but I know that Sandy Bridge is solid so that is what naturally drew me to it (that and its ~2,000 positive reviews :p)

graphics card is defo a little on the weak side, get a 6870 or 6950 if you want to reduce costs rather than go for one of the 28nm cards. The 6850 won't give you the wow performance i'm sure you'd like after seven years of staying with the same PC!

I did the least investigating on which graphics card to get, I came to the 6850 because it is the highest rated card in the $100-200 price range (on newegg), but I am definitely reconsidering towards the 6870 now -- thanks!

you don't need anywhere near 16gb of ram for gaming... you'll seriously struggle to use 8gb under that kind of usage. aside from that, everything else is great. maybe a better graphics hard such as a 7850 or a 560ti would be better considering you plan on doing a lot of gaming.

I had chosen the 16gb route because I had seen some games starting to recommend that amount - but I had initially thought it was overkill unless I was going to be doing production work (which I'm not). So I think I'll scale it back to 8gb, besides that will work perfectly as a dual-channel since I can't go quad (was planning a 4x4 configuration).Thanks!

getting 16GB makes sense, RAM is quite cheap now, so just get as much as you can afford, and i doubt anyone building a new PC with these specs can't afford 16GB. glad you're thinking of the 6870, it's a great card, been using it for a year and a half and it's going good and runs everything in high detail very well.

What's your budget?

Intel i5 2500 or i5 3570 for CPU

8gb of whatever ram, 16gb is overkill

Gigabyte z77-UD3 motherboard

nVidia 670 or ATi 7950

750watt psu

Something along those lines and you'll be away happily :)

I would swap the WD 1 TB drive for a 2 TB Seagate one (the new ones with 1 TB platters), and an SSD for your OS and Program Files. 16 GB of RAM is kind of overkill; 8 will do you just fine, unless you're way into video creation or other super memory intensive apps. Otherwise, you're good to go with that setup. I wouldn't get the i7; it's more expensive and the i5 will do super for you.

Great CPU choice for overclocking; that heat sink will also do fairly well. You should be able to do a conservative 4.2 - 4.3 GHz OC with decent temps. I'd also recommend an AMD 6870 or GTX 560 Ti if you prefer nVidia. An SSD is dramatic for speeding up boot, but a fast SATA III mechanical drive does well enough.

Overall you have a good choice of parts :)

Awesome CPU, I chose that one too. ;)

Personally I'd change mobo to a gigabyte/asus board since I've had problems with ASRock boards in the past but that's me. Also maybe downgrade the HDD to 750gb and invest into a 60gb SSD for your OS? And as others have said, the graphics card seems to be a little on the weak side, perhaps a slight upgrade.

Other than that (Y)

since you havent bought/built a new pc in 7 years, i'd suggest you increase your budget a bit and get some even more modern parts. im assuming that you probably wont build another PC for many years...

i'd buy an IB CPU and wait a bit for the imminent release of the GTX 670 or 660.

also, arguably, ASRock is a budget brand. I've only ever owned one and it died. imo, i'd get something better.

I planned to add in a SSD drive later on once I have the other parts - I just see it mainly as a luxury over the other parts. And I have heard of SSD having a lot of issues with longevity in performance (slowing down, becoming faulty, etc). But I have my eye on the Crucial M4!

That's not true actually. The only downside of a SSD is that it's expensive compared to a mechanical HDD. Reliability is extremely improved since the first generations.

A 120GB OCZ Vertex 3 or M4 can be had for around $120, so for a price to performance boost ratio, it should be a no brainer for every new build.

Save yourself the hassle of having to reinstall Windows and just get the SSD now. You won't regret it. :yes:

since you havent bought/built a new pc in 7 years, i'd suggest you increase your budget a bit and get some even more modern parts. im assuming that you probably wont build another PC for many years...

i'd buy an IB CPU and wait a bit for the imminent release of the GTX 670 or 660.

also, arguably, ASRock is a budget brand. I've only ever owned one and it died. imo, i'd get something better.

^ This guy speaks the truth. Goo with an ASUS motherboard, or something from another reputable brand. Also you really will want more graphics power seeing as this is a gaming PC. You'd even be better off with an i3 2100 if it means you can put the difference into a better graphics card.

  • 1 month later...

Here's an update! Thanks for changing my stance on SSD's... that boot time is unreal.

CPU: i5-3570K

Motherboard: ASUS z77-v PRO (originally bought the ud5h gigabyte board, and read so many bad things about it I switched it out)

Memory: G.Skill Sniper 1600 (Low volts, 1.25V), 8Gb (not 16 like I had planned, also thanks to neowin)

Hard drive: Crucial M4 128GB

Sound Card: ASUS Xonar DG

Power Supply: SeaSonic 650W, Gold Rated 80+ Certification

Case: Antec One

I am currently using the integreated graphics on the intel 3rd gen cpu... I am still on the hunt for a video card that won't break my wallet and will still offer modern games some justice... I prefer Nvidia if anyone has some ideas ($200-300 range)!

I am in love with my new build... thanks everyone who gave/gives some ideas. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
    • Amazon Prime Day 2026 deal sees Samsung Odyssey 49" 240Hz QD-OLED monitor at lowest price by Sayan Sen Earlier today we covered a very good deal on JBL's BAR 800 Dolby Atmos soundbar system as the unit is available for just $600 as part of Amazon Prime Day 2026 deals. That's not all though as there are many more discounts to choose from. If you are looking for a high-end monitor, Samsung's 49 inch G9 QD-OLED gaming monitor is a solid deal too as it's currently just $855 (purchase link under the specs table down below). It is a super-ultrawide (32:9) 1440p curved gaming monitor and as such should offer a very immersive experience. The G93SC is a 49-inch QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED) screen and that means it should have excellent contrast as well as color reproduction. Brightness is a bit lacking though so if you are looking to set it up in a relatively bright room, you may be better off with something else. Speaking of external light and brightness, the major difference on the G93SC vs the newer G93SD is that the latter comes with Samsung's "Glare Free" technology to reduce glare while the C model packs a glossy finish. The technical specifications of the Samsung G93SC are given in the table below: Specification Value Panel Type OLED Screen Shape Curved Screen Curvature 1800R Resolution DQHD (5120 × 1440) Aspect Ratio 32:9 Brightness (Typical) 250 cd/m² Brightness (Minimum) 200 cd/m² Contrast Ratio 1,000,000:1 HDR Support VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 HDR10+ HDR10+ Gaming Response Time 0.03 ms (GTG) Refresh Rate Up to 240 Hz Viewing Angle 178° Horizontal / 178° Vertical Color Support 1 Billion Colors Color Gamut 99% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) Adaptive Sync FreeSync Premium Pro / G-SYNC Compatible DisplayPort 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 HDMI 1 × HDMI 2.1 Micro HDMI 1 × Micro HDMI 2.1 USB Hub 3 × USB 3.0 Speakers Built-in Speaker Output 5W × 2 Channels Operating Temperature 10°C – 40°C Operating Humidity 10–80% (Non-condensing) Stand Type Height Adjustable Stand (HAS) Height Adjustment 120.0 ± 5.0 mm Tilt -2° (±2°) to 15° (±2°) Wall Mount 100 × 100 mm (VESA) Included HDMI Cable HDMI-to-Micro HDMI Cable Included DisplayPort Cable Yes Get it at the link below: Samsung 49" Odyssey G93SC Series Curved Gaming Monitor, QD-OLED: $854.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US with Prime) Prime subscription can be cancelled within three business days at no cost. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Actually Windows 11 is the GUI from Windows 10 X slapped onto Windows 10. Hence the many performance issues and initial limitations of the UI, like all the restrictions on the task bar placement and features. You could not even right click on the Taskbar and bring up task manager when it first shipped. Windows 10X was truly a new OS from the ground up. Basically a lightweight OS that ran containers for various app types. Win32 got its own container. Performance was not good and OEM’s pushed back on it, but wanted a new OS to push Pc sales. Hence Windows 11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10X
    • Windows 10 was 6 years old when Microsoft revealed Windows 11. Does this mean Windows 12 is due next year?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!