Recommended Posts

Hello Neowin!

I have not upgraded my computer for 7 years... needless to say the games I (can) play are on the lowest settings and still cry in pain (League of Legends runs at 06-12 fps).

I am seeking a critic of the build I currently have in mind - please feel free to point out mistakes, bottlenecks, inconsistencies, etc.

I intend to use this the computer for gaming (a reasonable frame rate/settings on current games) and general use (web, video, documents, photo editing). I am not "loyal" to any specific brand, BUT I would prefer to stay with Intel for the CPU. By the way, Diablo 3 comes out in 11 days!

Link to current build: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/7Lqm

graphics card is defo a little on the weak side, get a 6870 or 6950 if you want to reduce costs rather than go for one of the 28nm cards. The 6850 won't give you the wow performance i'm sure you'd like after seven years of staying with the same PC!

you don't need anywhere near 16gb of ram for gaming... you'll seriously struggle to use 8gb under that kind of usage. aside from that, everything else is great. maybe a better graphics hard such as a 7850 or a 560ti would be better considering you plan on doing a lot of gaming.

Thanks for all the input!

I'd snag a 128gb SSD also for that build. It's night and day with one.

I planned to add in a SSD drive later on once I have the other parts - I just see it mainly as a luxury over the other parts. And I have heard of SSD having a lot of issues with longevity in performance (slowing down, becoming faulty, etc). But I have my eye on the Crucial M4!

have you considered Intel i7-3770S + SSD (as main drive) Cooler , quiter and faster! plus better longevity and you are golden for the rest :)

I had considered the new Intel line, but as far as I know it hasn't improved a whole lot for gaming (I don't need the integrated gpu), and Ivy Bridge doesn't overclock as well/as easily as Sandy Bridge does - which I plan to do. But maybe I haven't done enough research on it. Does the 3rd gen really offer the gamer an incentive? I keep reading conflicting views on that, but I know that Sandy Bridge is solid so that is what naturally drew me to it (that and its ~2,000 positive reviews :p)

graphics card is defo a little on the weak side, get a 6870 or 6950 if you want to reduce costs rather than go for one of the 28nm cards. The 6850 won't give you the wow performance i'm sure you'd like after seven years of staying with the same PC!

I did the least investigating on which graphics card to get, I came to the 6850 because it is the highest rated card in the $100-200 price range (on newegg), but I am definitely reconsidering towards the 6870 now -- thanks!

you don't need anywhere near 16gb of ram for gaming... you'll seriously struggle to use 8gb under that kind of usage. aside from that, everything else is great. maybe a better graphics hard such as a 7850 or a 560ti would be better considering you plan on doing a lot of gaming.

I had chosen the 16gb route because I had seen some games starting to recommend that amount - but I had initially thought it was overkill unless I was going to be doing production work (which I'm not). So I think I'll scale it back to 8gb, besides that will work perfectly as a dual-channel since I can't go quad (was planning a 4x4 configuration).Thanks!

getting 16GB makes sense, RAM is quite cheap now, so just get as much as you can afford, and i doubt anyone building a new PC with these specs can't afford 16GB. glad you're thinking of the 6870, it's a great card, been using it for a year and a half and it's going good and runs everything in high detail very well.

What's your budget?

Intel i5 2500 or i5 3570 for CPU

8gb of whatever ram, 16gb is overkill

Gigabyte z77-UD3 motherboard

nVidia 670 or ATi 7950

750watt psu

Something along those lines and you'll be away happily :)

I would swap the WD 1 TB drive for a 2 TB Seagate one (the new ones with 1 TB platters), and an SSD for your OS and Program Files. 16 GB of RAM is kind of overkill; 8 will do you just fine, unless you're way into video creation or other super memory intensive apps. Otherwise, you're good to go with that setup. I wouldn't get the i7; it's more expensive and the i5 will do super for you.

Great CPU choice for overclocking; that heat sink will also do fairly well. You should be able to do a conservative 4.2 - 4.3 GHz OC with decent temps. I'd also recommend an AMD 6870 or GTX 560 Ti if you prefer nVidia. An SSD is dramatic for speeding up boot, but a fast SATA III mechanical drive does well enough.

Overall you have a good choice of parts :)

Awesome CPU, I chose that one too. ;)

Personally I'd change mobo to a gigabyte/asus board since I've had problems with ASRock boards in the past but that's me. Also maybe downgrade the HDD to 750gb and invest into a 60gb SSD for your OS? And as others have said, the graphics card seems to be a little on the weak side, perhaps a slight upgrade.

Other than that (Y)

since you havent bought/built a new pc in 7 years, i'd suggest you increase your budget a bit and get some even more modern parts. im assuming that you probably wont build another PC for many years...

i'd buy an IB CPU and wait a bit for the imminent release of the GTX 670 or 660.

also, arguably, ASRock is a budget brand. I've only ever owned one and it died. imo, i'd get something better.

I planned to add in a SSD drive later on once I have the other parts - I just see it mainly as a luxury over the other parts. And I have heard of SSD having a lot of issues with longevity in performance (slowing down, becoming faulty, etc). But I have my eye on the Crucial M4!

That's not true actually. The only downside of a SSD is that it's expensive compared to a mechanical HDD. Reliability is extremely improved since the first generations.

A 120GB OCZ Vertex 3 or M4 can be had for around $120, so for a price to performance boost ratio, it should be a no brainer for every new build.

Save yourself the hassle of having to reinstall Windows and just get the SSD now. You won't regret it. :yes:

since you havent bought/built a new pc in 7 years, i'd suggest you increase your budget a bit and get some even more modern parts. im assuming that you probably wont build another PC for many years...

i'd buy an IB CPU and wait a bit for the imminent release of the GTX 670 or 660.

also, arguably, ASRock is a budget brand. I've only ever owned one and it died. imo, i'd get something better.

^ This guy speaks the truth. Goo with an ASUS motherboard, or something from another reputable brand. Also you really will want more graphics power seeing as this is a gaming PC. You'd even be better off with an i3 2100 if it means you can put the difference into a better graphics card.

  • 1 month later...

Here's an update! Thanks for changing my stance on SSD's... that boot time is unreal.

CPU: i5-3570K

Motherboard: ASUS z77-v PRO (originally bought the ud5h gigabyte board, and read so many bad things about it I switched it out)

Memory: G.Skill Sniper 1600 (Low volts, 1.25V), 8Gb (not 16 like I had planned, also thanks to neowin)

Hard drive: Crucial M4 128GB

Sound Card: ASUS Xonar DG

Power Supply: SeaSonic 650W, Gold Rated 80+ Certification

Case: Antec One

I am currently using the integreated graphics on the intel 3rd gen cpu... I am still on the hunt for a video card that won't break my wallet and will still offer modern games some justice... I prefer Nvidia if anyone has some ideas ($200-300 range)!

I am in love with my new build... thanks everyone who gave/gives some ideas. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So the card is targeted at headphone users - so the review should be from someone that uses this - maybe I can review a card next time.
    • I have a older F4-210 NAS, it is pretty basic, the CPU is not the fastest by a long way and only 1GB of ram, but it works fine. I don't understand the need for A.I in a NAS. It seems like A.i is being shoved into everything, if we like it or not. i will stick to my old Terramsater NAS, thankfully the OS is not being updated. Also, got myself a small NAs built using a Raspberry Pi 5. iy usesd less energy, so stays on all the time. As for the unit above, if it is as reliable as my old Terramaster Nas, then it will be a good unit.
    • Gemini in Google Sheets can now help you debug and fix formula errors by David Uzondu Google has started rolling out an update to Gemini in Google Sheets that allows the AI to diagnose and fix formula errors in one click, as long as your Workspace admin has Gemini for Workspace in Sheets turned on. According to Google, the new feature can handle pretty much everything from basic arithmetic to very complex calculations. This ability to debug formula errors comes about two years after Google introduced basic formula generation with Gemini in Sheets. To create a formula with Gemini in Sheets, you open a spreadsheet on your computer and click Ask Gemini in the top right corner. You can also enter an equals sign in any cell and use a shortcut like Ctrl + Alt + G on Windows and Chrome OS, or Command + Ctrl + G on macOS. Once you open the side panel, you write a natural language prompt using your sheet references. For example, you can ask Gemini to divide goals by games, or to find cell C1 in range D:G. If for some reason, the formula Gemini generated doesn't work, or maybe you wrote the formula yourself, you can troubleshoot the issue directly inside the grid. When a cell shows an error message, you hover over it and click "Fix". This action opens the side panel where Gemini analyzes the data structure and automatically applies the fixes when they are ready. You can cancel the process at any time by clicking stop in the side panel. Image via Google Google has been pushing its Gemini integration in Google Sheets for a while now, steadily moving AI features from side panels directly into user spreadsheets. Last year, the Mountain View giant shipped an =AI() Function in Sheets that allowed users to run translation and text generation directly inside cells instead of using the side panel interface. Earlier this year, the company announced that Gemini in Sheets had reached near-human expert performance, achieving a 70.48% success rate on the SpreadsheetBench dataset.
    • I get what you are saying, If i go onto the Instagram site, it says log in with Facebook, but they are not allowed to link my account with Instagram until I do that. Maybe in the U.S, they can link them, but Privacy is not a thing in the U.S. the way things are going,l won;t be any better in the U.K.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!