TWEAK: Enable HPET (in BIOS and OS) for better performance and FPS


Recommended Posts

Tried turning it on in BIOS and the OS, and I do notice the mouse cursor ghosting but it is very minor (drags about 5-10 pixels behind the main mouse and it's very hard to notice unless I'm looking for it) but no real difference in performance (haven't tried any games or anything yet).

That being said, mine takes about 300 ticks to get a ratio of 1 and my DPC latency averages around 100 (fluctuates from 70-120) both with and without HPET enabled (completely disabled has roughly the same DPC latency as completely enabled).....in terms of benchmark testing, I see no real difference on my system with and without HPET, but I guess only time will tell if it holds stable/doesn't lag.

EDIT: The only noticeable change is my QueryPerformanceFrequency went from 3.14 or so (can't remember exact values) to 14.32.

What (if any) benefit would I see if I enable this in OS only, the BIOS does not have any option for HPET. Is it possible it might be labeled something else besides HPET?

Couldn't find anything in the BIOS, think it's hidden. Though I ran bcdedit /set useplatformclock true and I'm getting 14.31818 MHz now. But the ratio took longer to stabilise at 1.000 (took 180 seconds), it was alternating between 0.9997 and 0.9999 a lot.

Not spotted anything bad yet, like ghosting mouse pointer or such. My DPC latency remains unchanged, averages at 60-80us

One can still set the option in Windows if HPET is not found from BIOS. However if one has ACHI then it's a surprise if HPET is missing. One can also check HPET from device manager under system devices if you find "high precision event timer" then your hardware supports it. If you don't have HPET but use bcdedit to use platformclock,, you probably are better than TSC which is reduced timer. Actually Win Vista was heavily pushed towards HPET but they went backwards in Win7 for some reason, one is the green agenda.

Im running it on a i7 [email protected] (clocked in BIOS), and Asus P8Z68-V Pro mobo/NV 570GTX and enabling HPET & setting windows to solely use HPET via command prompt has fixed my micro-stuttering id see in BF3.

Result :) Cheers OP I owe ya a beer :)

Great! Good to hear. The best HPET result is that pushes that little extra by using accurate high frequency timer instead of TSC.

Couldn't find any option in the BIOS, but I did perform the HPET only tweak.

Is this good?

What hardware setup you have? Your setting of use platformclock sure is a lot better than TSC. Did you test any games? TSC is the same or lower than 1 core clock (TSC is locked to frequency that I don't right now remember), so combination and sync might or might not be better depending on hardware. HPET frequency can run a lot higher than TSC.

What (if any) benefit would I see if I enable this in OS only, the BIOS does not have any option for HPET. Is it possible it might be labeled something else besides HPET?

No not really, if you don't find HPET in BIOS then it's locked or completely unavailable. You can also check HPET from device manager under system devices if you find "high precision event timer" then your hardware supports it. If you don't have HPET but use bcdedit to use platformclock it will result to LAPICs which is better than TSC or TSC+LAPICs.

----------

One can only test and see. And especially test with games.

Also, always keep your drivers and BIOS up to date.

(There might be APIC or LAPIC in bios, check these with platformclock enabled / disabled to find best performance.)

I have an NForce i630/7100 motherboard and an Intel Core 2 Duo CPU (2.66GHz). I just checked Device Manager and HPET is there. Thanks for the tweak, I can't wait to test it out with Diablo 3!

My machine runs the slowest timer with it off, but it just seems more stable. Any speed increases I've seen could be attributed to a clean reboot.

zGobM.png

(Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ Default Clocks, ASUS Rampage Formula X48)

Thanks for being helpful Hardbag! I am testing various games. BF3 is my main one. I will post results when done testing.

I have come to the conclusion that this is just like snake oil, it does not help one bit! I did some checking and discovered that this option has to enabled in the BIOS for any 64BIT OS to install, and even after 'enabling' it in windows, I see no change what so ever.

Strange. My Windows 7 64-bit installs just fine with HPET disabled. :rofl:

Yeah, mine was in 32-bit mode since I got it, disabled it to test it and noticed no measurable change, enabled it in 64-bit mode and still noticed no measurable change......point is I run Windows 7 64-bit and went from 32-bit HPET, to disabled, to 64-bit and never had any problem, so it definitely doesn't need to be enabled for a 64-bit OS.

I didn't notice any sort of difference. I'll probably set it back to disabled in Windows. If this would honestly give a performance gain, MIcrosoft would have known already and implemented it by default.

Definitely not placebo, both my desktop and laptop load certain things faster. The most noticeable thing is navigation in event viewer, the panels are opening faster, also windows explorer is more responsive.

On the laptop is even better, It is a lot quicker in almost everything, the query freq went from 1.4 to 14.3 MHz. My desktop runs on Intel P35 chipset and the laptop on 965 chipset, both with Windows 7 SP1 32bit.

I still call BS. I have had it enabled and upon reading this thread have disabled it. My system boot faster now that I have disabled it and my programs launch a lot quicker as well. When I had it enabled it took quite a bit to get to the desktop upon boot and launching programs was a bit slower.

I think the reason no-one can agree if it helps or not is because it makes some things better and some things worse.

General use of the PC seems worse, like the example above, booting takes longer etc,

Gaming seems hit and miss, it cured my BF3 CFX problem, for the 1st time ever I can play with 2 cards now, other games seem smoother when they work, but some freeze up every few seconds

I guess thats why MS didn't enable it as default, too many problems for it to be a solid part of the OS code as default

It depend on hardware setup, some get better response especially in games, and some doesn't,

In Win Vista HPET was better used/implemented, but in Win 7 it was drawn back, probably because of uncompatibility issues with many, so they (MS) stick with TSC.

I hear that in Windows 8 LAPICs are dropped off...

  • 2 weeks later...

Just thought I would voice my expierence with this.

HPET in BIOS: Enabled (was Enabled)

HPET Bit Level in BIOS: 64bit (was at 32bit)

HPET in WINDOWS: True (unknown previous setting).

Tested: Grand Theft Auto IV

Results: Able to max out every setting including vSync and Distance, Detail. Game was night and day smoother also. So definatly noticed it here. Was never able to do vSync smoothly.

Tested: Windows

Results: Snappier transitions, and overall improved expierence.

Tested: TotalMedia Theater 5

Results: Transitioning from Full Screen to De-Maximized has also improved.

Rig Specifications

CPU: OC 3.8Ghz 2700k i7 2nd Generation

HD: Raid-0 Sata III Corsair 60GB x 2 = 120GB

Graphics: eVGA 460GTX 1GB

Memory: 16GB DDR3 1600Mhz Corsair XMS Type

I applied this a while ago. I just noticed over the past couple of days that I'm getting some occasional cursor lag, it'll just stick for like quarter of a second and then carry on as usual.

Did anyone else get this as an issue with changing the system timer?

Thanks for the tip though is it maybe a Intel only thing? I haven't looked in my BIOS yet but I'm on a GIGABYTE AM3+ board and the device manage lists no HPET device :pinch: (Or is it related to the fact that I still use a 32bit OS? :p)

EDIT: Looking through the online manual my GA-870A-UD3 seems to support HPET, I guess I will play around with it sometimes^^

My ratio takes a few minutes to settle at 1.000, should I be worrying about this?

I also discovered I had 32 bit HPET enabled in BIOS, and not in Windows. Since I already had it enabled, I guess I should see no difference going to 64 bit and enabling it in Windows except maybe a decrease in microstutters.

It seems as if this option was always on in my BIOS, but disabled in the OS. I enabled it and the WinTimer app reported my sync performance at 14.something MHZ, and whilst it appeared to have no real effect in gaming (my primary usage) it did seem to make my mouse notably more laggy. The BIOS I have only had options for "Enabled" and "Disabled" so I can't tell you whether it was 32 or 64 bit, and whether it was running in mixed mode but my performance seems best with it enabled in BIOS but disabled in OS. Setup is as follows:

i7-2700k overclocked to 4.8 GHZ (1.4v)

Asus ROG Maximus IV Extreme-Z Z68 Motherboard (Bios version 3304)

8GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3-1600

2GB ATI 6950 (Bios Modded to unlock the extra shaders)

OCZ Agility 3 60GB boot drive

  • 2 weeks later...

Latencies are about the same as before (according to that DPC Latency Checker tool). QueryPerformanceFrequency is now at 14.31818 MHz, but I don't really notice a difference in performance.

I'll have to give it more time and see what happens.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!