• 0

Technical drawbacks of using a VM ? Are there any ?


Question

Hi all, I have a bunch of Linux Distros Im wanting to test out, and also the CP of Windows 8. I know its not practical to Partition and its Time Costly using Live CDs; so, my question is, if I was to run VBox or VMWare to run the ISOs in, what are the drawbacks of not using "native" hardware ? I understand that there may be speed issues but what other quirks should I know about before I begin ? Also, as I said, Im planning on using VBox and the 30day Trial of VMWare, is there any Distro ( and Win8 ) that will run better in one and not the other ?

Many Thanks in advance for your wise words :)

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I had no luck running the W8 preview with VirtualBox, although apparently others have had no problems. Anyway, if you'll just be testing operating systems you don't need any VMWare trial, VMWare Player is free and enough for what you need.

Drawbacks? Well, just bear in mind that what the guest OS sees is not the real hardware. After installing the VMWare/VBox guest tools everything should work fine, but you'll likely still find that HW acceleration performance is a bit crappy and sound might not work great.

  • 0

There aren't any "quirks" in virtualization hence it's widespread use everywhere from data centers to small business. Certainly while demo'ing software, virtualization shines. The only drawbacks you'd encounter are with older processors that don't have the latest virtualization instructions. Also, dedicated graphics support is very limited still in any virtulization software but VMware Workstation is best.

  • 0
  On 08/05/2012 at 16:28, TW.4T said:

Hi all, I have a bunch of Linux Distros Im wanting to test out, and also the CP of Windows 8. I know its not practical to Partition and its Time Costly using Live CDs; so, my question is, if I was to run VBox or VMWare to run the ISOs in, what are the drawbacks of not using "native" hardware ?

Live CDs are great, but they can be limited still. If you're using a virtual machine, it'd be better to install the actual OS and check for updates. Sounds more like you don't want to reboot and be without Windows/internet while you play around with them rather then needing a VM.

  On 08/05/2012 at 16:28, TW.4T said:

I understand that there may be speed issues but what other quirks should I know about before I begin ?

If your CPU supports virtualisation, the guest OS should run at near full speed. What you really need to be aware of is the lack of hardware support from the guest OS. ie Drivers, and that'll be your biggest issue with speed.

  On 08/05/2012 at 16:28, TW.4T said:

Also, as I said, Im planning on using VBox and the 30day Trial of VMWare, is there any Distro ( and Win8 ) that will run better in one and not the other ?

VMware is better supported across more Guest OS, however, vbox, if it works for what you want is just as good. I'd try to go with VMWare if you can.. but it really depends what you want to do with them after you've played around with the OSs.

  • 0

There is no 3d graphics acceleration available as of now in both VMware and virtualbox for Linux distros! So, that's the foremost problem you are going to face if you need to test or run graphic intensive applications!

Other than that, everything should run fine and dandy!

  • 0

The main drawbacks...That I have seen.

Limitations are based upon the Host OS (speed and number of processors), amount of memory you can spare to the VM.

VM does not have direct access to special features of hardware (such as video cards)- most use a generic video render (some use the S-3 trident) So basically it is software based render which is a bit slower. (but then again it would be just like using an onboard video and only limit is how much memory you can spare from the allotment for the VM to use for video memory.)

Bottom line -- only drawback is if you like a lot of eye-candy and would want to play a game it may have a big drawback. For what they are designed for they work perfectly.

  • 0

There aren't any disadvantage apart from the performance at least for personal use.

One thing i Have noticed is if you use laptop your battery capacity goes down drastically when using linux(with Ubuntu).

Maybe it was just me but wanted to give a heads up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Every browser has that functionality, pretty standard feature. Except with others they have built in ad-blockers (like Brave) or full desktop grade ublock extension (Firefox)
    • You can sync bookmarks and tabs across all your devices using other browsers as well, that's not a feature exclusive to Google Chrome. So, if that's your reason to use Google Chrome on Android specifically, you have a narrow view of the world. You can use practically any browser these days and all of them will support sync.
    • I just made an account on 0patch I'm going to for 5 years in advance My fully loaded Acer aspire 7 (2019) will live up these 5 years in ease Laptop is not glued, there are about 20 screws to open it, I can maintain it with ease, no soldered memory or so, I clean it up every 6 months, I'l last for maybe another 8 years
    • Microsoft Teams gets a much needed health dashboard for admins by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is one of the most widely used tools for online collaboration and communication, especially in enterprise environments. This also means that any problem with the software has the potential to impact many customers and workflows. Up until now, the Teams troubleshooting process was fairly manual and cumbersome, but Microsoft is now looking to resolve this issue with a new "Teams client health" dashboard for admins. If a Teams instance now faces any kind of disruption, Teams administrators and helpdesk teams can use this dashboard to proactively diagnose and resolve the problem, rather than waiting for a disgruntled user to come to them with incomplete information. Microsoft says that Teams client health is focused on providing actionable insights that actually do require administrator input, surfacing actual issues that cannot self-heal, and highlighting persistent problems rather than one-offs. The Redmond tech firm has highlighted several scenarios where the Teams client health dashboard can enhance productivity with minimal disruption to workflows. One example is dealing with customers who are experiencing crashing issues in Teams. Rather than engaging in a manual process that involves asking them to reproduce the issue, you can simply leverage the health dashboard to spot problematic spikes and then remediate them yourself (as a Teams admin) through the provided mitigation guide. Similarly, another scenario involves monitoring and auditing if people within your organization are using the latest version of Teams. Right now, this is a very manual process, but with the health dashboard, you get these insights directly, including details about potential issues that might be blocking Teams updates. As expected, the Teams client health dashboard is available for admins and helpdesk teams within the Teams Admin Center. Still, Microsoft has encouraged customers to bookmark a direct link to the dashboard for easier recurrent navigation.
    • Fact that microsoft needs to explain why.. that prooves that they kinda failed with win 11.......... like Vista
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      pelaird earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Mentor
      The Werewolf went up a rank
      Mentor
    • First Post
      Myriachan earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      608
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      218
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      167
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      157
    5. 5
      Som
      148
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!