• 0

Technical drawbacks of using a VM ? Are there any ?


Question

Hi all, I have a bunch of Linux Distros Im wanting to test out, and also the CP of Windows 8. I know its not practical to Partition and its Time Costly using Live CDs; so, my question is, if I was to run VBox or VMWare to run the ISOs in, what are the drawbacks of not using "native" hardware ? I understand that there may be speed issues but what other quirks should I know about before I begin ? Also, as I said, Im planning on using VBox and the 30day Trial of VMWare, is there any Distro ( and Win8 ) that will run better in one and not the other ?

Many Thanks in advance for your wise words :)

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I had no luck running the W8 preview with VirtualBox, although apparently others have had no problems. Anyway, if you'll just be testing operating systems you don't need any VMWare trial, VMWare Player is free and enough for what you need.

Drawbacks? Well, just bear in mind that what the guest OS sees is not the real hardware. After installing the VMWare/VBox guest tools everything should work fine, but you'll likely still find that HW acceleration performance is a bit crappy and sound might not work great.

  • 0

There aren't any "quirks" in virtualization hence it's widespread use everywhere from data centers to small business. Certainly while demo'ing software, virtualization shines. The only drawbacks you'd encounter are with older processors that don't have the latest virtualization instructions. Also, dedicated graphics support is very limited still in any virtulization software but VMware Workstation is best.

  • 0
  On 08/05/2012 at 16:28, TW.4T said:

Hi all, I have a bunch of Linux Distros Im wanting to test out, and also the CP of Windows 8. I know its not practical to Partition and its Time Costly using Live CDs; so, my question is, if I was to run VBox or VMWare to run the ISOs in, what are the drawbacks of not using "native" hardware ?

Live CDs are great, but they can be limited still. If you're using a virtual machine, it'd be better to install the actual OS and check for updates. Sounds more like you don't want to reboot and be without Windows/internet while you play around with them rather then needing a VM.

  On 08/05/2012 at 16:28, TW.4T said:

I understand that there may be speed issues but what other quirks should I know about before I begin ?

If your CPU supports virtualisation, the guest OS should run at near full speed. What you really need to be aware of is the lack of hardware support from the guest OS. ie Drivers, and that'll be your biggest issue with speed.

  On 08/05/2012 at 16:28, TW.4T said:

Also, as I said, Im planning on using VBox and the 30day Trial of VMWare, is there any Distro ( and Win8 ) that will run better in one and not the other ?

VMware is better supported across more Guest OS, however, vbox, if it works for what you want is just as good. I'd try to go with VMWare if you can.. but it really depends what you want to do with them after you've played around with the OSs.

  • 0

There is no 3d graphics acceleration available as of now in both VMware and virtualbox for Linux distros! So, that's the foremost problem you are going to face if you need to test or run graphic intensive applications!

Other than that, everything should run fine and dandy!

  • 0

The main drawbacks...That I have seen.

Limitations are based upon the Host OS (speed and number of processors), amount of memory you can spare to the VM.

VM does not have direct access to special features of hardware (such as video cards)- most use a generic video render (some use the S-3 trident) So basically it is software based render which is a bit slower. (but then again it would be just like using an onboard video and only limit is how much memory you can spare from the allotment for the VM to use for video memory.)

Bottom line -- only drawback is if you like a lot of eye-candy and would want to play a game it may have a big drawback. For what they are designed for they work perfectly.

  • 0

There aren't any disadvantage apart from the performance at least for personal use.

One thing i Have noticed is if you use laptop your battery capacity goes down drastically when using linux(with Ubuntu).

Maybe it was just me but wanted to give a heads up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amarok 3.3 Beta 2 replaces Phonon API with GStreamer by David Uzondu Audio players come and go, but one of the long-standing pack leaders is Amarok, a KDE project that has been around since 2003. This player was an essential application for anyone who ran a KDE 3 system, mostly because its interface was simple and did not get in your way. After spending some time in hibernation following the 2.x series, development has picked up again. Now we have version 3.3 Beta 2, bringing some changes under the hood. The most important of which is a complete overhaul of the audio engine. The developers have ditched the old Phonon multimedia framework on Qt6 and reworked everything to use GStreamer instead. The developers have also partially restored CUE sheet support, which is fantastic news for anyone who keeps albums as single audio files. ReplayGain logic has been improved to apply a default fallback value for tracks without loudness data, helping to even out the volume. Some work was also done to prevent potential database issues that could happen during library scans. This release also finalizes some major changes that were introduced in the first beta, as outlined below: Dropping support for Qt5 and KDE Frameworks 5 entirely. It is Qt6 from here on out. Updating the database character set to allow full UTF-8 values, which is great for international music collections. Fixing a year 2038 bug for dates stored in the database. Removing TagLib extras support, which affects RealMedia and Audible files. Now, before you rush off to install it, there are a couple of things to know. Because the first beta updated the database schema, downgrading from this beta back to an older version is not really possible unless you manually backed up your music library first. Also, if you are a big Last.fm user, its official library has not caught up with the Qt6 world yet. You will need a specific build from a repository like this one to get those features working for now. If you are feeling adventurous and want to try the new beta, you will probably have to build it yourself. For that, you can check out the project on GitLab for the source code and guidance. Some Linux distributions might also package the beta in their testing or unstable repositories, so it is worth a look there, too. You can grab the latest stable version of Amarok on Linux via FlatHub.
    • Yeah, stable and consistent data-harvesting to secure you and your 801 partners bottom line...thanks but no thanks.
    • The ethical thing for MS to do (a foreign concept) would be to continue full support for WIndows-10; until WIndows-11 is stable and mature enough to be considered reliable. Give users the ability to get decent use out of hardware they have bought, that MS decided are no longer able to run WIndows-11.
    • Why should users give up using a relatively stable OS (after almost a decade from its initial release) and move to a Beta+ level OS? Maybe in four or five more years, when it finally becomes more stable. Oh, and we have finally gotten fair use out of the hardware we bought, only to have MS say "toss it."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Bert Fershner earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Reacting Well
      ChrisOdinUK earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Year In
      Steviant earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      545
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      205
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      150
    5. 5
      Som
      131
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!