Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I think my Core i5 2500K is running too hot and causing a BSOD in Handbrake when encoding large files. I've been leaving my PC on overnight to recode some MKVs for my Plex server, but every couple of nights it will turn itself off or reboot after what is apparently a BSOD error.

The main error report I see when logging back into Windows says:

Problem signature:

Problem Event Name: BlueScreen

OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1

Locale ID: 2057

Additional information about the problem:

BCCode: 124

BCP1: 0000000000000000

BCP2: FFFFFA8009AE3028

BCP3: 00000000BE200000

BCP4: 000000000005110A

OS Version: 6_1_7601

Service Pack: 1_0

Product: 256_1

Files that help describe the problem:

C:\Windows\Minidump\051112-12698-01.dmp

C:\Users\Ray\AppData\Local\Temp\WER-62572-0.sysdata.xml

Read our privacy statement online:

http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409

If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:

C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt

I started another file encoding on Handbrake and then ran HWMonitor to check the temps. The CPU is running at over 90C, which seems pretty bad to me. I turned off Handbrake and the temps immediately dropped to 50C. You can see what HWMonitor was showing under load here:

HWMonitor.png

I have uploaded the full HWMonitor.txt report here.

I think I'm running at standard speeds, but to be honest I can't remember whether my Asus motherboard's "optimised O/C mode" is running and I didn't have time to check before I left for work this morning. I'm running a stock cooler in a well ventilated Coolermaster case that has, until now, provided decent cooling even under sustained heavy loads. I've not had chance to double check the CPU cooler but I'm usually very careful to make sure they're fitted properly.

The Windows crash report files are below but I don't know how to open the .dmp file without it turning into gibberish:

WER-62572-0.sysdata

051112-12698-01.dmp

Do you think the CPU is causing the BSOD error?

Any tips/advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.

Although it sounds like an easy question Wave, Intel now sell a few different "stock" coolers and their new CPU's dont come with a cooler. Is he using the water cooled one? The really small air one or the large air one?

EDIT:// I'm guessing the mid sized air one by your latest post. In that case get a good aftermarket tower style air cooler.

It just seems like any other stock cooler I've had before, so I guess it's a "mid-sized" one. It's definitely air cooled.

I'm happy to replace the cooler but even the stock cooler shouldn't be seeing temps like this should it? If there's another problem causing the overheating I want to address that first - I can always get a better cooler later.

Well whilst the air coolers Intel ship with their processors aren't great you are right to say it shouldn't be this hot. I would expect the high load temperature to be around 70c not 90c - And based on the temperature of your Graphics Card I would take an educated guess and say your case has good air flow.

I assume you've already checked the heatsink for dust so it could be the cooler isn't locked down properly or the thermal paste is not making proper contact. The first thing I'd do is remove the cooler, clean its base and the top of the processor and apply some fresh thermal paste. Something like MX-4 is fine to use and affordable.

It could be a matter of:

A) The heatsink is covered in dust, preventing a decent transfer of heat when under load. Would need cleaning, which is usually an excellent point to check point B.

B) Thermal paste has run it's course, so would need cleaning off and re-applying some new paste. If the heatsink is detached from the CPU, you will need to clean and re-apply the paste anyway.

C) There is a lack of airflow around where the CPU fan draws air, so it isn't getting enough cool air to cope with the increased heat.

  • Like 2

I've only had it for a few months so I think it's unlikely to be dust or dry thermal paste. I guess it could be a lack of airflow but I did a pretty neat job of clearing wires etc when I installed it. I'll check it over when I get home just in case though, it's got to be worth checking.

I know absolutely nothing about voltages - is there any possibility that they're set incorrectly and could be causing this? How would I check?

If it's only a few months old, then I would check the heatsink seating to the CPU as it may have come loose and so will not be making a proper connection.

I wouldn't say it's the voltages, as I've got exactly the same CPU and it's showing the same voltages.

Sounds like I've got the same idle temperatures as you too.

So from what I can figure (and I may be wrong), it could be either an improper seating so the heat transfer isn't good enough...or there was too little/too much paste used when it was put together, again causing a problem with the heat transfer.

Analysed your dump file with WhoCrashed and the details are below:

crash dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\051112-12698-01.dmp

This was probably caused by the following module: hal.dll (hal+0x12A3B)

Bugcheck code: 0x124 (0x0, 0xFFFFFA8009AE3028, 0xBE200000, 0x5110A)

Error: WHEA_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR

file path: C:\Windows\system32\hal.dll

product: Microsoft? Windows? Operating System

company: Microsoft Corporation

description: Hardware Abstraction Layer DLL

Bug check description: This bug check indicates that a fatal hardware error has occurred. This bug check uses the error data that is provided by the Windows Hardware Error Architecture (WHEA).

This is likely to be caused by a hardware problem problem. This problem might be caused by a thermal issue.

The crash took place in a standard Microsoft module. Your system configuration may be incorrect. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver on your system which cannot be identified at this time.

So yeah definitely an issue with either the HSF (being clogged with dust or faulty) or insufficient thermal paste...or worse; the CPU! Also make sure your BIOS is up to date as well as the chipset drivers.

I would definitely recommend getting an aftermarket CPU cooler, especially if you are constantly stressing the CPU with video encoding etc.

Are you running a stock cooler on yours Aldur82?

I am, but I don't do anything nearly as intensive as video encoding so I don't know if my CPU would end up reaching the same temperatures.

I've been thinking about getting a new cooler (a heat pipe style) as my temperature jumps to about 60 degrees just with listening to music, and idles around 50-52 depending on the ambient temperature of the room.

Is the OP overclocking?

If not, I find it quite annoying the amount of tech heads that instantly say "oh, you have to fit an aftermarket cooler" - which is clearly rubbish. If you're not overclocking, the stock coolers are more than enough to cool it properly, regardless of what you're doing.

If that wasn't the case, don't you think there would have been a massive uproar, and thousands upon thousands of complaints about them over heating?

It's much more likely that there's an issue with dust or thermal paste here.

Is the OP overclocking?

If not, I find it quite annoying the amount of tech heads that instantly say "oh, you have to fit an aftermarket cooler" - which is clearly rubbish. If you're not overclocking, the stock coolers are more than enough to cool it properly, regardless of what you're doing.

If that wasn't the case, don't you think there would have been a massive uproar, and thousands upon thousands of complaints about them over heating?

It's much more likely that there's an issue with dust or thermal paste here.

No one here said "oh, you have to fit an aftermarket cooler".

Is the OP overclocking?

If not, I find it quite annoying the amount of tech heads that instantly say "oh, you have to fit an aftermarket cooler" - which is clearly rubbish. If you're not overclocking, the stock coolers are more than enough to cool it properly, regardless of what you're doing.

If that wasn't the case, don't you think there would have been a massive uproar, and thousands upon thousands of complaints about them over heating?

It's much more likely that there's an issue with dust or thermal paste here.

Actually, if you're constantly raising the temperature of your CPU you're causing degredation - ergo, It's advisable (quite rightly so) to recommend a better after-market cooling solution to maintain the lower temperatures for the longevity of the CPU in cases where high stress is placed on the CPU for long periods of time.

However that being said; yes it really shouldn't be hitting over 70-75c and so there quite probably is either a dust or thermal-paste issue occuring here too.

No one here said "oh, you have to fit an aftermarket cooler".

+1

Yes who are you actually quoting "Wakers"?!

Suggestions have merely been made here and not ultimatums; due to the OP running a lot of video encoding tasks that highly stresses the CPU.You are also assuming that he has not overclocked when in fact he stated in his first post that he does not know if he has or not (his motherboard may have applied an overclock profile to his system from the push of a button or through the use of software): "I think I'm running at standard speeds."

Do you think it's just a coincidence that my CPU is running hot then? I'll have to dig out my spare GPU from the loft and see if that makes any difference to the BSOD, though I still want to get my temps down!

Ok guys well the hot CPU *seems* to have been resolved. It turns out that the "optimised" mode was enabled in the BIOS. I disabled this, and now temps are running at an average of about 70C, peaking at 76C briefly, and I've been recoding files for about an hour. Certainly nowhere near the 90C I was getting this morning after 20 minutes.

I've got a few more files to go through tonight so I'll leave it on again and if it's not crashed by the morning I guess it's safe to say the problem has been resolved.

Thanks for all the help guys.

OK that makes sense! That's why I mentioned an overclock profile earlier. Seems as though the stock cooler couldn't handle the overclock then.

Glad you got it sorted, those temps are much better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!