Need help wit SBS 2011 and Exchange 2010


Recommended Posts

My problem is 2 fold in a way as it seems to work but not fully

Using the microsoft exchange test utility I get the following 2 errors (the otehr 2 tests are passed green 100% - OWA works fine) ... have tried looking into those 2 errors but unable to get to the bottom of it ...

running the Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTP)

Attempting to ping RPC proxy mail.domain.com

RPC Proxy can't be pinged.

Additional Details

An HTTP 401 Unauthorized response was received from the remote Unknown server. This is usually the result of an incorrect username or password. If you are attempting to log onto an Office 365 service, ensure you are using your full User Principal Name (UPN).

running the Exchange ActiveSync

An ActiveSync session is being attempted with the server.

Errors were encountered while testing the Exchange ActiveSync session.

Test Steps

Attempting to send the OPTIONS command to the server.

Testing of the OPTIONS command failed. For more information, see Additional Details.

Additional Details

An HTTP 401 Unauthorized response was received from the remote IIS7 server. This is usually the result of an incorrect username or password. If you are attempting to log onto an Office 365 service, ensure you are using your full User Principal Name (UPN).

My problem is 2 fold in a way as it seems to work but not fully

Using the microsoft exchange test utility I get the following 2 errors (the otehr 2 tests are passed green 100% - OWA works fine) ... have tried looking into those 2 errors but unable to get to the bottom of it ...

running the Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTP)

Attempting to ping RPC proxy mail.domain.com

RPC Proxy can't be pinged.

Additional Details

An HTTP 401 Unauthorized response was received from the remote Unknown server. This is usually the result of an incorrect username or password. If you are attempting to log onto an Office 365 service, ensure you are using your full User Principal Name (UPN).

running the Exchange ActiveSync

An ActiveSync session is being attempted with the server.

Errors were encountered while testing the Exchange ActiveSync session.

Test Steps

Attempting to send the OPTIONS command to the server.

Testing of the OPTIONS command failed. For more information, see Additional Details.

Additional Details

An HTTP 401 Unauthorized response was received from the remote IIS7 server. This is usually the result of an incorrect username or password. If you are attempting to log onto an Office 365 service, ensure you are using your full User Principal Name (UPN).

what errors are you seeing ?

can you send or receive mail?

have you set up a "mail.domain.com" in dns

Yes, sending works , receiving works but Outlook 2007 unable to make it work (although I have encountered a domain name where they cannot send/receive to me and I cannot send/receive from them, otehrwise all other domains - hotmail/yahoo/rogers/others seem to work fine

hmmm ... all i can tell you as of this second is that if I go into Server Config - Client Access - Ecp I have the internal and external domains there ...

not sure (have not come upon a tutorial to set that up per say)

Authentication - form based

Yes the port is opened and tested (443) and within the lan/server I get the propr 505/501 error so in essesnce it is working but have no clue why outlook would not budge (could it be because of the form based authentication -- make it basic?)

Edit: have not tried outlook within the lan though, only wan - which is not working

what do you mean? ... a bit more info if it helps

In outlook 2007 (could upgrade if that is the problem) ....

establishing network connection (check - good)

search for user server settings (autodiscovery - check -good)

then logon to server keeps asking for password over and over and over again

so I am assuming that the server or something within IIS or Exchange is blocking the request ... I have no clue what or why or where to even look

I would have to try that once I get home, I can only remote to the server and make config and test from anotehr computer to see if it works ...

So, I should try it within the network to see if it works ...

Now

Case 1: works, then it means something is blocking the protocol to get outside the network

Case2: not working then a bigger problem I would assume

Yes, 443 is open and good to go, exchange has been restarted

What puzzles me the most is that

1. Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTP) says cannot ping proxy

2. Exchange ActiveSync says send Option command

I have recreated the virtual directories for ECP and autodiscovery ... yet, manual/automatic setup not working

Edit: which is true. I cannot ping the damn site. IT works fine for mail.domain and domain.com but not ping ....

Can u connect to

Https://server/owa from a local computer? Use the internal server name. First let's test internal. To make life easier get a cert from an authorized certificate provider.

If you want to get this working quickly we can do a join.me session.

I can confirm the following are working from within the lan

OWA / ECP / Autodiscovery

I can also confirm the following are working on WAN

OWA / ECP / Autodiscovery (https://server/OWA (or ecp_

Will do the test for Outlook within LAN today once I get home ... the certificate I hae is recognised and passes the microsoft exchange test for atuodiscovery and activesync

as far as I can look at rpc is installed and configured ... active sync seems to be fine, but just to doublecheck

under server config client access https://mail.domain....rver-ActiveSync can be accessed from WAN just fine (though it gives the error http version not supported) from within LAN same thing (505/501 common error)

for RPC same thing .... I will be running the assumption both services are up and runing and the 505 http version not supported from what I have read mean it works fine ?!

have not tried locally with outlook (did not cross my mind as I wanted it to work from WAN - oversight on my part - will do it once I get home from work) as for logs, have not found anything conclusive in IIS nor exchange though I only looked briefly)

but from what you can deduce from what I have provided, it should work right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They thought value of their goods would forever only drop like it used to and didn't account for sudden increase in price because of all the Ai hype. Tough luck Samsung, don't try to weasel this one out. Also American customer protection laws are a**. In Europe, you need to be compensated for a functioning product of same or better characteristics (not same price point as when it was originally bought!) if it can't be repaired and when you receive a replacement product your warranty starts from scratch because you received a different item than you previously had and old warranty thus cannot apply to it anymore. If your actual item was successfully repaired, warranty gets extended for the period the item was in service. If item is repaired to a significant extent, warranty also starts over from scratch because major part of it was replaced. Americans need to fight to get this kind of consumer protections because they are constantly getting screwed over.
    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      184
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!