Recommended Posts

Apple Fanboy?s Love Letter On Nokia Lumia 900 Windows Phone

Apple-fan-loves-windows-phone.jpg?e83a2c

Microsoft?s Windows Phone website posted a letter sent to CEO Steve Ballmer from a Apple fanboy on his newly purchased Nokia Lumia 900 Windows Phone device. Read it below.

From: Scott G.

Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:50 PM

To: Steve Ballmer

Subject: Apple fanboy loves his Windows phone

Mr. Ballmer,

Hopefully this will get to you. Your team deserves credit for producing an excellent product in the newest version of Windows Phone. Yes, I am writing from my MacBook Pro. And I have been a fairly loyal Apple customer over the years. However, I recently bought a Nokia Lumia 900 and intend on keeping it. For full disclosure, I was sure to make sure it could be returned after a dismal experience with an Android phone.

My reasons for switching are:

  • Call quality. I actually use my phone as a phone. That concept seems to get lost in many product reviews. One of my employees actually thanked me for getting rid of my iPhone as it was so much easier to hear me. I apologize for the tedium but it means a great deal to me and my business.
  • Simplicity. My family owns five vehicles, including two Fords with Sync. The 4S didn?t support all functions in any of them. My Nokia 900 was flawless out of the box. It was refreshing to have something that just worked. I cannot afford to have my primary means of communication be a science experiment.
  • No junk software. Speaking of science experiments, I also tried a Motorola Razr. Software that cannot be deleted and restarts itself? A company with questionable privacy rules. Software that terrified my poor in-laws? I guess if you like spending your day tinkering with your phone, it?s pretty cool. Maybe it beats playing with your Star Wars dolls?
  • Simplicity again. Everything after set up has been painless as well. Adding apps, setting up email accounts, etc. I thought the iPhone was good. Your set up was actually smoother and took less time. Same for Wi-Fi, in-car Bluetooth, etc.
  • Speed. The 900 doesn?t seem to lag the way the iPhone did at times. Everything seems to execute quickly. That I don?t think about it is probably the best compliment.
  • Live Tiles. It?s a minor thing but the Metro tiles are pretty cool. I just like the look.

Best regards,

Scott G.

Source: WMPoweruser

Link: The love letter on the Microsoft website

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/
Share on other sites

Last time I checked, call quality is not a feature of the OS. After reading that, I can't take the rest of the points seriously.

call quality of a feature of a phone, which runs an OS. He's comparing phones, not OS's, so both OS features as well as hardware are fair game.

+1 for reading comprehension.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869029
Share on other sites

call quality of a feature of a phone, which runs an OS. He's comparing phones, not OS's, so both OS features as well as hardware are fair game.

+1 for reading comprehension.

Yes, they compared it to the iPhone, which is perfectly fine. But, he's loving Windows Phone (article title), so the rest of the points are directed at software, and this one point is not software related whatsoever. Each device will have different call quality, even amongst Windows phones. That's how I comprehended it.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869035
Share on other sites

Software that terrified my poor in-laws?.... How can Google software terrify anyone? :blink:

Android UI can be and in my experience is very confusing for novice users.

I'm surprised he would comment on the call quality as my iPhone 4S is crystal clear for both sides of the call in my experience.

I guess that's the key.

Yes, they compared it to the iPhone, which is perfectly fine. But, he's loving Windows Phone (article title), so the rest of the points are directed at software, and this one point is not software related whatsoever. Each device will have different call quality, even amongst Windows phones. That's how I comprehended it.

Well :/ Lumia 900 is a Windows Phone. If you really want to be pedantic, the OS is Windows Phone 7.5 not Windows Phone.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869165
Share on other sites

I think for years AT&T got most of the flack of poor call quality but it's just as much the iPhones fault. Maybe Apple fixed it in the 4s but regardless I've heard people say they've experienced a jump in call quality after moving off of their iPhones while still on AT&T.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869181
Share on other sites

Don't see what merits this story to be exceptional or why it merits coverage in this way.

A written experience of a person who was primarily in the Apple ecosystem should not differ in weight over say a person with their hands in all three ecosystems (Apple's, Microsoft's, Google's).

Regarding call quality: coming from a feature phone, call quality was almost the same after moving to an iPhone. Rogers's network isn't amazing by any shot :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869343
Share on other sites

I think for years AT&T got most of the flack of poor call quality but it's just as much the iPhones fault. Maybe Apple fixed it in the 4s but regardless I've heard people say they've experienced a jump in call quality after moving off of their iPhones while still on AT&T.

Well I never had call quality problems with my iPhone 3G on AT&T but I did have a lot of random call drops that have disappeared after I stopped using iPhone. Never had problems before (SE w810i) or after (Samsung Focus) in the same locations home/work, downtown Boston and surrounding areas etc..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869599
Share on other sites

Well I never had call quality problems with my iPhone 3G on AT&T but I did have a lot of random call drops that have disappeared after I stopped using iPhone. Never had problems before (SE w810i) or after (Samsung Focus) in the same locations home/work, downtown Boston and surrounding areas etc..

Same here, although I'm still on an iPhone. I had dropped calls all the time on my 3GS. I have a 4S now, but I can't test it until I return to America. The biggest thing for me with the iPhone is the amount of storage you can get. I love having 64GB built in!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869633
Share on other sites

I'm surprised he would comment on the call quality as my iPhone 4S is crystal clear for both sides of the call in my experience.

Two of the guys I work with have iPhones and they're both really hard to hear. I laughed when I read the letter because I often ask them to upgrade to a better phone because of this. Whenever I complain they say that everyone they speak to says the same thing.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869641
Share on other sites

Pretty accurate except:

A company with questionable privacy rules.... No their privacy rules are clear, you are just one of those who believe about the Google conspiracies :alien:

Software that terrified my poor in-laws?.... How can Google software terrify anyone? :blink:

Google's rules may well be clear but they're still questionable. When a company's privacy rules tell you that they'll use your data and personal files for anything they want to I think that's questionable.

must say that, unless you got an high end Android device, the experience is gonna be flawed (sometimes lagging, locking, slowing). And that's the biggest problem with Android.

It would be nice if that were true but Android's lagginess isn't restricted to cheaper phones. Even superphones like the One X suffer from the problem.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869651
Share on other sites

I think for years AT&T got most of the flack of poor call quality but it's just as much the iPhones fault. Maybe Apple fixed it in the 4s but regardless I've heard people say they've experienced a jump in call quality after moving off of their iPhones while still on AT&T.

I noticed that iphones are hrrible when moving from wifi to 3g and back and from tower to tower. a lot of times i have to end up turning airplane mode on then off again. I have had an iphone 3gs, iphone 4 and now the 4s . All of them do the same thing. My call quality is horrible because of it. I am pretty sure its a software thing and not a hardware thing.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1077625-apple-fanboy/#findComment-594869661
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!